Obama Misrepresenting Romney's Tax Plan

Have you read the Rosen report?

Have you read Rosen saying that Obama is misrepresenting his work. Who you going to believe?

Rosen makes absurd assumptions in his work. At one point he assumes that Romney is going to get rid of the charity deduction, the mortgage interest deduction, and state and local tax deductions.

On what planet will that ever happen?

What planet do you live on?
 
Rosen makes absurd assumptions in his work. At one point he assumes that Romney is going to get rid of the charity deduction, the mortgage interest deduction, and state and local tax deductions.

On what planet will that ever happen?

Soooooo, Obama's interpretation of Rosen's work trumps Rosen's understanding of his own work. Man, it's good to be king!

Rosen's analysis actually proves that Romney's plan will never be revenue neutral because to make it revenue neutral Rosen has to make assumptions that measures will be taken that are politically impossible to be taken.

Is that why Obama hid under his desk instead of trying to pass a real deficit reduction plan?
 
I knew this would happen.

The libtards like an economists study so much, they claim it proves Romney's tax plan increases taxes on the middle class.

The economist himself says that isn't true, that Romney's plan does NOT increase taxes on the middle class.

The libtards tell the economist he doesn't know what he's talking about, regarding his own study!

As long as the economist agrees with the libtards, he knows what he's talking about. As soon as he doesn't, he's an idiot.

Make up your minds, libtard fuckwads.
 
Rosen makes absurd assumptions in his work. At one point he assumes that Romney is going to get rid of the charity deduction, the mortgage interest deduction, and state and local tax deductions.

On what planet will that ever happen?

Soooooo, Obama's interpretation of Rosen's work trumps Rosen's understanding of his own work. Man, it's good to be king!

Rosen's analysis actually proves that Romney's plan will never be revenue neutral because to make it revenue neutral Rosen has to make assumptions that measures will be taken that are politically impossible to be taken.

Rosen says you don't know your ass from a hole in the ground. Take it up with him.
 
Soooooo, Obama's interpretation of Rosen's work trumps Rosen's understanding of his own work. Man, it's good to be king!

Rosen's analysis actually proves that Romney's plan will never be revenue neutral because to make it revenue neutral Rosen has to make assumptions that measures will be taken that are politically impossible to be taken.

Rosen says you don't know your ass from a hole in the ground. Take it up with him.

That's not true. A hole in the ground is empty, while his ass has Obama's johnson inside it.
 

Forum List

Back
Top