Obama Knew in Advance About Lockerbie Bomber's Release

[Coyote]

Yeah the government would never talk out of both sides of it's mouth.

You see what I mean?

Yup....



...I just hate to see idiocy go unremarked on though.....

 

[Contumacious]

Surprise! Obama knew in advance about the release of Lockerbie bomber Abdel Baset al-Megrahi, who murdered 169 Americans, into the welcoming arms of terrorist dictator Moammar Qadhafi. Eric Holder, who has been involved in the release of terrorists before, talked with his Scottish counterpart Kenny MacAskill about letting al-Megrahi go back in June.

Another very small surprise — the most transparent administration ever is blocking the release of documents on this subject:

The Scottish government told FOX News Tuesday that the U.S. government refuses to allow them to release details of any communication between Scotland and the U.S. over al-Megrahi's release.
By the way, Obama's close friend and spiritual mentor for 20 years, Jeremiah Wright, once traveled to Libya with Louis Farrakhan to kiss Qadhafi's ring. The trip was in violation of a travel ban imposed by President Reagan due to Libya's terrorist activities, and was clearly intended to flaunt their allegiance with America's enemies. At the meeting, Farrakhan agreed to help Qadhafi fight America from the inside. He and his friends are doing a bang-up job of it.

The Brits may have released al-Megrahi as part of an oil deal, but our moonbat rulers don't believe in blood for oil. They just believe in blood — American blood, spilled by their terrorist allies.

If the suppressed documents ever come to light, they won't show that Comrade Obama tried very hard to prevent the release of a killer regarded by Qadhafi as a hero. Why would he? They are on the same side.


US warned of hero’s welcome for Pan Am 103 bomber - The Boston Globe
Gateway Pundit: Of Course-- Team Obama Knew of Lockerbie Bomber's Release Months Ago ...Update: White House Blocks Release of Document!

Absolutely no surprise there... The odds are that the discussion of such has been going on for years and the Bush Administration squelched it... and that with the 'CHANGE' of the pro-Islamic-terrorist Hussein regime, came the green light; and THEREIN lies why they want the lid of kept on the communications...

Payback Is A Bitch


.

 

[rdean]

This morning on Morning Joe, I watched the prime minister of Great Britian say Obama didn't know and they didn't have to tell the US anything if they didn't want to. Now the conservatives in Great Britian are calling for an investigation because they said, the reason the Prime Minister kept it secret is because of a secret oil deal.

I guess you guys and the Boston Globe and Fox knows more than the Prime Minister of Great Britian.

 

[Xenophon]

Of course he knew.

Its unlikely GB would do something like this without discussing it with the USA.

 

[rdean]

Of course he knew.

Its unlikely GB would do something like this without discussing it with the USA.

Why?

 

[Caroljo]

And, as predicted, the only people who care are right-wing nutjobs.

EVERYONE needs to start caring!

 

[Vast LWC]

And, as predicted, the only people who care are right-wing nutjobs.

EVERYONE needs to start caring!

No, they don't.
Certainly not about stupid made up BS like this.

 

[PubliusInfinitum]

It would be nice to know if he at least tried to stop it, or if he did anything.

You must have missed this part of the article:

Scotland has faced unrelenting criticism from both the US government and the families of American victims of the airline bombing since the decision to free Megrahi on compassionate grounds. The Scots said he was dying of prostate cancer.

Truly - it looks as if the poster of this thread didn't even read the article he was posting about.

ROFLMNAO... Well there ya have it kids... the assurance that the US government has advanced "unrelenting criticism' of this move, is PROOF POSITIVE that the BOY KING was steadfastly against, emphatically refused to grant his assent... and took every measure within the extent of his considerable means to prevent the United Kingdom from undermining justice for the hundreds of Americans which the Islamic terrorist MURDERED.

Everyone up to speed?

LOL...



Leftists...

 

[PubliusInfinitum]

Yeah the government would never talk out of both sides of it's mouth.

You see what I mean?

Yup....



...I just hate to see idiocy go unremarked on though.....

So the US regime which came to town claiming to be the most transparent administration EVER... the regime who has effectively sealed their communications on the issue... should not have their veracity doubted... just because they've been prone towards rewarding Islamic terrorists, such in their giving a BILLION DOLLARS TO HAMAS... the largest Islamic terrorist organization in the WORLD... and they're concealing their communications on the issue...

Meaning that YOU TRUST 'EM! And that's fine... trust away.

I don't... and that you feel that conspiracies don't happen is pretty well put to bed every single day as one conspirator after the next is sent brought on on charges and those that went before them sent to prison for their respective conspiritorial actions...

Here's a fact for ya: The US Executive knew about the release, before the release and did NOTHING to stop it. Refute that...

 

[Coyote]

You see what I mean?

Yup....



...I just hate to see idiocy go unremarked on though.....

So the US regime which came to town claiming to be the most transparent administration EVER... the regime who has effectively sealed their communications on the issue... should not have their veracity doubted... just because they've been prone towards rewarding Islamic terrorists, such in their giving a BILLION DOLLARS TO HAMAS... the largest Islamic terrorist organization in the WORLD... and they're concealing their communications on the issue...

Hello Pubes...howz life

Transparent or not - only a idiot would believe there could or should ever be 100% transparency or you'd compromise security.

Meaning that YOU TRUST 'EM! And that's fine... trust away.

No reason - or evidence - not to on this particular issue.

[quote
I don't... and that you feel that conspiracies don't happen is pretty well put to bed every single day as one conspirator after the next is sent brought on on charges and those that went before them sent to prison for their respective conspiritorial actions...
[/quote]

So are you tellling me they've finally got to the bottom of the 9/11 conspiracy?

Here's a fact for ya: The US Executive knew about the release, before the release and did NOTHING to stop it. Refute that...

Sweetheart....you wouldn't know a fact if it hit on the head...but that's ok, I love you anyway.

Now...before refuting it....can you provide any evidence to back up your claim?

 

[Coyote]

It would be nice to know if he at least tried to stop it, or if he did anything.

You must have missed this part of the article:

Scotland has faced unrelenting criticism from both the US government and the families of American victims of the airline bombing since the decision to free Megrahi on compassionate grounds. The Scots said he was dying of prostate cancer.

Truly - it looks as if the poster of this thread didn't even read the article he was posting about.

ROFLMNAO... Well there ya have it kids... the assurance that the US government has advanced "unrelenting criticism' of this move, is PROOF POSITIVE that the BOY KING was steadfastly against, emphatically refused to grant his assent... and took every measure within the extent of his considerable means to prevent the United Kingdom from undermining justice for the hundreds of Americans which the Islamic terrorist MURDERED.

Everyone up to speed?

LOL...



Leftists...

Of course...it's easy to keep up to speed with the short bus

 

[Polk]

Of course he knew.

Its unlikely GB would do something like this without discussing it with the USA.

That's quite a difference from saying he could have done something about it, however.

 

[Yukon]

So what, who cares ??????????????

Surprise! Obama knew in advance about the release of Lockerbie bomber Abdel Baset al-Megrahi, who murdered 169 Americans, into the welcoming arms of terrorist dictator Moammar Qadhafi. Eric Holder, who has been involved in the release of terrorists before, talked with his Scottish counterpart Kenny MacAskill about letting al-Megrahi go back in June.

Another very small surprise — the most transparent administration ever is blocking the release of documents on this subject:

The Scottish government told FOX News Tuesday that the U.S. government refuses to allow them to release details of any communication between Scotland and the U.S. over al-Megrahi's release.
By the way, Obama's close friend and spiritual mentor for 20 years, Jeremiah Wright, once traveled to Libya with Louis Farrakhan to kiss Qadhafi's ring. The trip was in violation of a travel ban imposed by President Reagan due to Libya's terrorist activities, and was clearly intended to flaunt their allegiance with America's enemies. At the meeting, Farrakhan agreed to help Qadhafi fight America from the inside. He and his friends are doing a bang-up job of it.

The Brits may have released al-Megrahi as part of an oil deal, but our moonbat rulers don't believe in blood for oil. They just believe in blood — American blood, spilled by their terrorist allies.

If the suppressed documents ever come to light, they won't show that Comrade Obama tried very hard to prevent the release of a killer regarded by Qadhafi as a hero. Why would he? They are on the same side.


US warned of hero’s welcome for Pan Am 103 bomber - The Boston Globe
Gateway Pundit: Of Course-- Team Obama Knew of Lockerbie Bomber's Release Months Ago ...Update: White House Blocks Release of Document!

 

[JordanM]

Reasons not to release the communications:

1) The Obama administration was totally ineffective in persuading Scotland not to release Megrahi.
2) The Obama administration bowed down to yet another foreign leader.
3) Some type of deal was in the works which the Obama administration doesn't want the people to know about because it wouldn't look good for his administration and would only further drag his public support down.

Anyway you look at there isn't a positive reason not to allow the release of the information. For those who may disagree with that position I ask, what state secret relevant to security could possibly be included in the communications?

For a more developed argument along these lines please visit The American Principles Project website.

 

[ba1614]

Reasons not to release the communications:

1) The Obama administration was totally ineffective in persuading Scotland not to release Megrahi.
2) The Obama administration bowed down to yet another foreign leader.
3) Some type of deal was in the works which the Obama administration doesn't want the people to know about because it wouldn't look good for his administration and would only further drag his public support down.

Anyway you look at there isn't a positive reason not to allow the release of the information. For those who may disagree with that position I ask, what state secret relevant to security could possibly be included in the communications?

For a more developed argument along these lines please visit The American Principles Project website.

Obama likely asked them to pretty please not release him, and they told him to go fuck himself. Then Obama, true to form, likely apologized for asking.

 

[WillowTree]

Reasons not to release the communications:

1) The Obama administration was totally ineffective in persuading Scotland not to release Megrahi.
2) The Obama administration bowed down to yet another foreign leader.
3) Some type of deal was in the works which the Obama administration doesn't want the people to know about because it wouldn't look good for his administration and would only further drag his public support down.

Anyway you look at there isn't a positive reason not to allow the release of the information. For those who may disagree with that position I ask, what state secret relevant to security could possibly be included in the communications?

For a more developed argument along these lines please visit The American Principles Project website.

Obama likely asked them to pretty please not release him, and they told him to go fuck himself. Then Obama, true to form, likely apologized for asking.

i think obamalama begged them to release him,, so he could score brownie points..

 

[PubliusInfinitum]

You must have missed this part of the article:



Truly - it looks as if the poster of this thread didn't even read the article he was posting about.

ROFLMNAO... Well there ya have it kids... the assurance that the US government has advanced "unrelenting criticism' of this move, is PROOF POSITIVE that the BOY KING was steadfastly against, emphatically refused to grant his assent... and took every measure within the extent of his considerable means to prevent the United Kingdom from undermining justice for the hundreds of Americans which the Islamic terrorist MURDERED.

Everyone up to speed?

LOL...



Leftists...

Of course...it's easy to keep up to speed with the short bus

So my argument represents that of the retard... which I suppose is possible... But when one examines the debate only to realize that you've demonstrated little means to compete with that argument... it doesn't serve your interests to advertise that argument as being the product of a retard.

So... are ya sure that's where ya want to go?

 

[Coyote]

ROFLMNAO... Well there ya have it kids... the assurance that the US government has advanced "unrelenting criticism' of this move, is PROOF POSITIVE that the BOY KING was steadfastly against, emphatically refused to grant his assent... and took every measure within the extent of his considerable means to prevent the United Kingdom from undermining justice for the hundreds of Americans which the Islamic terrorist MURDERED.

Everyone up to speed?

LOL...



Leftists...

Of course...it's easy to keep up to speed with the short bus

So my argument represents that of the retard... which I suppose is possible... But when one examines the debate only to realize that you've demonstrated little means to compete with that argument... it doesn't serve your interests to advertise that argument as being the product of a retard.

So... are ya sure that's where ya want to go?

We're talking about speed here...now let's look at your debate.

First, strip out all the hysterical laughter and nonrelevant witticisms...and what do we have? Not much.

First off, you seem to forget that the UK is an independent nation - not an extension of U.S. sovereignty. We can influence but not force our will upon them...which you seem to think is what should have been done...so...threat of sanctions....sever relations? Britain is a key ally so I seriously doubt it is in our country's interest to go that route over a dying terrorist.

Up to speed here bubba?

Second...well...not much for second....except you might want to check your numbers..."hundreds of Americans" sounds like it's at least a hundred and something over the mark sweetheart.

Now...got any proof that Obama was complicit in this guys release or...is your only proof a notable lack of proof?

 

[Vast LWC]

Seriously why does anyone respond to stupid fucking threads like this, letting these members of the Party of Hate define the debate???

Do you not see their overall strategy, to blanket the internet and the airwaves with utter bullshit, with the theory that some of it, when thrown, will stick?

If you see a moronic BS thread filled with lies and propaganda, like this one, DON'T RESPOND TO IT. Unless your response is to dismiss it out of hand.

 

[Sinatra]

Surprise! Obama knew in advance about the release of Lockerbie bomber Abdel Baset al-Megrahi, who murdered 169 Americans, into the welcoming arms of terrorist dictator Moammar Qadhafi. Eric Holder, who has been involved in the release of terrorists before, talked with his Scottish counterpart Kenny MacAskill about letting al-Megrahi go back in June.

Another very small surprise — the most transparent administration ever is blocking the release of documents on this subject:

The Scottish government told FOX News Tuesday that the U.S. government refuses to allow them to release details of any communication between Scotland and the U.S. over al-Megrahi's release.
By the way, Obama's close friend and spiritual mentor for 20 years, Jeremiah Wright, once traveled to Libya with Louis Farrakhan to kiss Qadhafi's ring. The trip was in violation of a travel ban imposed by President Reagan due to Libya's terrorist activities, and was clearly intended to flaunt their allegiance with America's enemies. At the meeting, Farrakhan agreed to help Qadhafi fight America from the inside. He and his friends are doing a bang-up job of it.

The Brits may have released al-Megrahi as part of an oil deal, but our moonbat rulers don't believe in blood for oil. They just believe in blood — American blood, spilled by their terrorist allies.

If the suppressed documents ever come to light, they won't show that Comrade Obama tried very hard to prevent the release of a killer regarded by Qadhafi as a hero. Why would he? They are on the same side.


US warned of hero’s welcome for Pan Am 103 bomber - The Boston Globe
Gateway Pundit: Of Course-- Team Obama Knew of Lockerbie Bomber's Release Months Ago ...Update: White House Blocks Release of Document!

This is actually a much bigger story - potentially, than the surface might suggest.

Obama's clear lack of influence upon our allies is clearly displayed with this growing scandal.

If his administration was somehow complicit in allowing this to happen - in any way, it will be HUGE. Even the liberal media will call him to task for it...