Obama killing American soldiers

[P@triot]

Expect to be reported, as well. They don't like freedom of speech when it shines a light on them.

Reported for what? The numbers are 100% accurate and there is a link to the news broadcast. Are they going to report me for being right?

 

[Vel]

The most astounding numbers you'll ever see, and the main stream media refuses to report it (yet they tore apart Bush for considerably LESS than 1/2 of these numbers):

In 8 years under George W. Bush, 625 American military men & women died in Afghanistan. In only 3 years under Barack Hussein Obama, 1,474 American military men and women have died in Afghanistan. That's right, 70% (for those not good at math) of those that have died in Afghanistan, have done so UNDER Barack Obama - and that was only in 3 years.

Additionally, in 8 years under George W. Bush there were 2,638 Americans were injured in Afghanistan. In only 3 years under Obama, an astounding 14,817 have been injured. 84% of ALL injuries since the war in Afghanistan began have occurred under Barack Obama.

He's not only killing our freedoms and our economy, he's literally killing our military men and women. Thank God America is sending him home for good in November!

GOP hits president on foreign policy

what a bunch of crock....

there were over 4400 us military killed in Iraq, and less killed in Afghanistan because President bush brought the war to Iraq and basically left afghanistan and his proclamation to get bin Laden, "Dead or Alive" and there were officially over 33,000 americans wounded in Iraq......

Let's al least try to get the numbers correct before you all continue to have your whine fest....

afghanistan was left by the wayside and the deaths occurred in Iraq

When Bush was president our troops were allowed to properly defend themselves and were able to forge working relationships with locals. Obama stopped both those practices. After seeing him leave the Dr. in Pakistan twisting in the wind, do you really think anyone wants to help the U.S.?

 

[koshergrl]

They'll report it for something, I promise. They don't like people reporting the facts, and they especially don't like it pointed out that progressivism is deadly.

Meanwhile, for Care & lickedher:

[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Md7OvU5JIcI"]Ululation (high-pitched tongue trill) 1 - YouTube[/ame]

 

[LilOlLady]

As counterterrorism officials investigate a new 'credible' terror threat, records show there have been at least 45 jihadist terrorist-attack plots against Americans since 9/11—thwarted by intelligence work, policing, and citizen involvement. John Avlon reports.

9/11 Anniversary: 45 Terror Plots Foiled in Last 10 Years - The Daily Beast


Al Qaeda is just little piss marks now because of Obama.

 

[J.E.D]

Obama killing American soldiers

You forgot about the thousands killed in Bush's war in Iraq. You also forgot to mention that Bush started the war in Afghanistan.

And you're a sack of shit for politicizing the deaths of honorable Americans.

 

[J.E.D]

When Bush was president our troops were allowed to properly defend themselves

Sen. Clinton Says Lack of Body Armor is 'Unforgivable' - ABC News

Jan. 10, 2006

So far in Iraq, more than 2,100 American troops have been killed. Critics like Clinton, D-N.Y., say that many of these deaths are the result of inadequate body armor. A secret Pentagon study of 93 Marines who were killed in Iraq found that 74 died after they were hit by a bullet or shrapnel in the torso or shoulders -- areas unprotected by the armor most are issued.

Clinton pointed to President Bush and Vice President Dick Cheney as the culprits. Some have said that supplying Marines and soldiers with armor that covers their sides is too expensive -- costing about $260 for each person. Clinton said that considering the United States' defense budget was half a trillion dollars, the additional protection was affordable.

 

[P@triot]

Obama killing American soldiers

You forgot about the thousands killed in Bush's war in Iraq. You also forgot to mention that Bush started the war in Afghanistan.

And you're a sack of shit for politicizing the deaths of honorable Americans.

We're not talking about Iraq. And Al Qaeda started the war in Afghanistan. And Bill Clinton allowed Al Qaeda to start it.

As far as "politicizing" - all I'm doing is sharing the information the main stream media won't because they, like you, would rather see young honorable people die than see Obama lose his seat in the White House. Sad but very true.

 

[Mustang]

Obama killing American soldiers

You forgot about the thousands killed in Bush's war in Iraq. You also forgot to mention that Bush started the war in Afghanistan.

And you're a sack of shit for politicizing the deaths of honorable Americans.

We're not talking about Iraq. And Al Qaeda started the war in Iraq. And Bill Clinton allowed Al Qaeda to start it.

As far as "politicizing" - all I'm doing is sharing the information the main stream media won't because they, like you, would rather see young honorable people die than see Obama lose his seat in the White House. Sad but very true.

Boy you must really HATE Reagan then considering that he left the Beirut Barracks undefended and that resulted in the bombing deaths of 241 American servicemen, 58 French servicemen, and 6 civilians.

 

[Vel]

When Bush was president our troops were allowed to properly defend themselves

Sen. Clinton Says Lack of Body Armor is 'Unforgivable' - ABC News

Jan. 10, 2006

So far in Iraq, more than 2,100 American troops have been killed. Critics like Clinton, D-N.Y., say that many of these deaths are the result of inadequate body armor. A secret Pentagon study of 93 Marines who were killed in Iraq found that 74 died after they were hit by a bullet or shrapnel in the torso or shoulders -- areas unprotected by the armor most are issued.

Clinton pointed to President Bush and Vice President Dick Cheney as the culprits. Some have said that supplying Marines and soldiers with armor that covers their sides is too expensive -- costing about $260 for each person. Clinton said that considering the United States' defense budget was half a trillion dollars, the additional protection was affordable.

Given the condition that the Clinton administration left our military in, I don't think Hillary had much room to talk. And as a Senator that voted to send our men into harms way, she should also have made certain that our troops had EVERYTHING they needed.
Executive Summary: The Facts About Military Readiness

 

[P@triot]

When Bush was president our troops were allowed to properly defend themselves

Sen. Clinton Says Lack of Body Armor is 'Unforgivable' - ABC News

Jan. 10, 2006

So far in Iraq, more than 2,100 American troops have been killed. Critics like Clinton, D-N.Y., say that many of these deaths are the result of inadequate body armor. A secret Pentagon study of 93 Marines who were killed in Iraq found that 74 died after they were hit by a bullet or shrapnel in the torso or shoulders -- areas unprotected by the armor most are issued.

Clinton pointed to President Bush and Vice President Dick Cheney as the culprits. Some have said that supplying Marines and soldiers with armor that covers their sides is too expensive -- costing about $260 for each person. Clinton said that considering the United States' defense budget was half a trillion dollars, the additional protection was affordable.

As usual, you're changing the conversation. Not having equipment ready/available is certainly an outrage.

But not allowing them to defend themselves is unforgivable. Putting the appeasement of muslims above the lives of our honorable young men and women is repulsive (which what else is Obama, but repulsive).

 

[J.E.D]

When Bush was president our troops were allowed to properly defend themselves

Sen. Clinton Says Lack of Body Armor is 'Unforgivable' - ABC News

Jan. 10, 2006

So far in Iraq, more than 2,100 American troops have been killed. Critics like Clinton, D-N.Y., say that many of these deaths are the result of inadequate body armor. A secret Pentagon study of 93 Marines who were killed in Iraq found that 74 died after they were hit by a bullet or shrapnel in the torso or shoulders -- areas unprotected by the armor most are issued.

Clinton pointed to President Bush and Vice President Dick Cheney as the culprits. Some have said that supplying Marines and soldiers with armor that covers their sides is too expensive -- costing about $260 for each person. Clinton said that considering the United States' defense budget was half a trillion dollars, the additional protection was affordable.

Given the condition that the Clinton administration left our military in, I don't think Hillary had much room to talk. And as a Senator that voted to send our men into harms way, she should also have made certain that our troops had EVERYTHING they needed.
Executive Summary: The Facts About Military Readiness

So, the buck DOESN'T stop with Bush on the inadequate body armor, but it DOES stop with Obama on the deaths in Afghanistan. Got it. Thanks for proving you're a hypocritical piece of shit.

 

[Care4all]

The most astounding numbers you'll ever see, and the main stream media refuses to report it (yet they tore apart Bush for considerably LESS than 1/2 of these numbers):

In 8 years under George W. Bush, 625 American military men & women died in Afghanistan. In only 3 years under Barack Hussein Obama, 1,474 American military men and women have died in Afghanistan. That's right, 70% (for those not good at math) of those that have died in Afghanistan, have done so UNDER Barack Obama - and that was only in 3 years.

Additionally, in 8 years under George W. Bush there were 2,638 Americans were injured in Afghanistan. In only 3 years under Obama, an astounding 14,817 have been injured. 84% of ALL injuries since the war in Afghanistan began have occurred under Barack Obama.

He's not only killing our freedoms and our economy, he's literally killing our military men and women. Thank God America is sending him home for good in November!

GOP hits president on foreign policy

what a bunch of crock....

there were over 4400 us military killed in Iraq, and less killed in Afghanistan because President bush brought the war to Iraq and basically left afghanistan and his proclamation to get bin Laden, "Dead or Alive" and there were officially over 33,000 americans wounded in Iraq......

Let's al least try to get the numbers correct before you all continue to have your whine fest....

afghanistan was left by the wayside and the deaths occurred in Iraq

The numbers are correct... We're not talking about Iraq, we're talking about Afghanistan. If you can't keep up with the conversation, don't weigh in. If you want to talk about Iraq, then start a new thread for that, stupid.

Why not include Iraq Rot...was it NOT a part of the war on terror? If it wasn't then why did bush go there?

You are wayyy off base with neglecting the Americans killed in Iraq as part of this equation....way way way off base....

it should be included, otherwise you are saying to the families of those men and women killed in fighting the war in Iraq, where President Bush turned his focus to, that they were killed or injured for no reason at all.....and that is simply SHAMEFUL.

 

[P@triot]

You forgot about the thousands killed in Bush's war in Iraq. You also forgot to mention that Bush started the war in Afghanistan.

And you're a sack of shit for politicizing the deaths of honorable Americans.

We're not talking about Iraq. And Al Qaeda started the war in Iraq. And Bill Clinton allowed Al Qaeda to start it.

As far as "politicizing" - all I'm doing is sharing the information the main stream media won't because they, like you, would rather see young honorable people die than see Obama lose his seat in the White House. Sad but very true.

Boy you must really HATE Reagan then considering that he left the Beirut Barracks undefended and that resulted in the bombing deaths of 241 American servicemen, 58 French servicemen, and 6 civilians.

Reagan passed away years ago. Your obsession with him tells me that his legacy as one of the greatest presidents of all time, while being a conservative, is an impossible pill for you to swallow.

There are very young & honroable men and women who are now dead. What do you say we try to stay on task here and bring this information to light in hopes of saving more of them from that same fate?

Or does Obama sitting in the White House superede the lives of 18 year old American's in your sick, twisted head?

 

[bobcollum]

Rottweiler is such a hypocrite.

That or he thinks starting a crusade against Islam won't lead to any US deaths.

 

[Vel]

Sen. Clinton Says Lack of Body Armor is 'Unforgivable' - ABC News

Jan. 10, 2006

So far in Iraq, more than 2,100 American troops have been killed. Critics like Clinton, D-N.Y., say that many of these deaths are the result of inadequate body armor. A secret Pentagon study of 93 Marines who were killed in Iraq found that 74 died after they were hit by a bullet or shrapnel in the torso or shoulders -- areas unprotected by the armor most are issued.

Clinton pointed to President Bush and Vice President Dick Cheney as the culprits. Some have said that supplying Marines and soldiers with armor that covers their sides is too expensive -- costing about $260 for each person. Clinton said that considering the United States' defense budget was half a trillion dollars, the additional protection was affordable.

Given the condition that the Clinton administration left our military in, I don't think Hillary had much room to talk. And as a Senator that voted to send our men into harms way, she should also have made certain that our troops had EVERYTHING they needed.
Executive Summary: The Facts About Military Readiness

So, the buck DOESN'T stop with Bush on the inadequate body armor, but it DOES stop with Obama on the deaths in Afghanistan. Got it. Thanks for proving you're a hypocritical piece of shit.

Our soldiers in Afghanistan had the same equipment that our soldiers in Iraq had under the Bush Administration and we lost far fewer of them until the ludicrous ROE's that were put in place by Obama. I know it's tough but you'll have to deal with the fact that the Obama policies are contributing to a higher than necessary body count.

 

[P@triot]

Why not include Iraq Rot...was it NOT a part of the war on terror? If it wasn't then why did bush go there?

You are wayyy off base with neglecting the Americans killed in Iraq as part of this equation....way way way off base....

it should be included, otherwise you are saying to the families of those men and women killed in fighting the war in Iraq, where President Bush turned his focus to, that they were killed or injured for no reason at all.....and that is simply SHAMEFUL.

Because it was your "dear leader" who you fellate every day who said the focus should be in Afghanistan. He's the one that set the policy to put full attention in Afghanistan. He's the one who set the policy that our troops are not allowed to defend themselves. He's the one who set the policy that said while they are being shot, they cannot shoot back, but rather, must call their superiors to find out if it is ok to fight.

The only thing shameful is that you'd rather see very young men & woman parish as long as Obama gets to keep sitting in the White House. That's why you're trying to deflect on his behalf and redirect the conversation.

If you want to start a thread on Iraq, knock yourself out. But this information that has come to light is about Afghanistan. The nation that your "dear leader" chose to make the focus of his presidency. And it is his choices and his policies that has resulted in 70% of the total deaths. 70% that occurred in only 3 years, while only 30% occurred in 8 years of George W. Bush.

 

[bodecea]

LilOlLady: I don't care how many people have to die, just as long as Obama gets re-elected. That's all that matters. Go Obama - fuck American's! And fuck our military!

Wrong....and your big blustery font doesn't make it any truer.


Now...go play some more on your XBox, pretending you are nuking the Middle East.

 

[P@triot]

Sen. Clinton Says Lack of Body Armor is 'Unforgivable' - ABC News

Jan. 10, 2006

So far in Iraq, more than 2,100 American troops have been killed. Critics like Clinton, D-N.Y., say that many of these deaths are the result of inadequate body armor. A secret Pentagon study of 93 Marines who were killed in Iraq found that 74 died after they were hit by a bullet or shrapnel in the torso or shoulders -- areas unprotected by the armor most are issued.

Clinton pointed to President Bush and Vice President Dick Cheney as the culprits. Some have said that supplying Marines and soldiers with armor that covers their sides is too expensive -- costing about $260 for each person. Clinton said that considering the United States' defense budget was half a trillion dollars, the additional protection was affordable.

Given the condition that the Clinton administration left our military in, I don't think Hillary had much room to talk. And as a Senator that voted to send our men into harms way, she should also have made certain that our troops had EVERYTHING they needed.
Executive Summary: The Facts About Military Readiness

So, the buck DOESN'T stop with Bush on the inadequate body armor, but it DOES stop with Obama on the deaths in Afghanistan. Got it. Thanks for proving you're a hypocritical piece of shit.

So what exactly does it say that George W. Bush did not provide the body armor neccessary, yet lost 625 American's in 8 years while our military does have the proper body armor now, and we have lost 1,474 in only 3 years under Obama?

You're actually defeating yourself with your own argument.

 

[P@triot]

LilOlLady: I don't care how many people have to die, just as long as Obama gets re-elected. That's all that matters. Go Obama - fuck American's! And fuck our military!

Wrong....and your big blustery font doesn't make it any truer.


Now...go play some more on your XBox, pretending you are nuking the Middle East.

"Wrong"...? What a useful post bodecea. You add such depth, knowledge, and insight into this board. Can't even imagine why someone would take the time to type such useless drivel. You must really have zero life at all, uh? Must be bored out of your fucking mind....

 

[P@triot]

Rottweiler is such a hypocrite.

That or he thinks starting a crusade against Islam won't lead to any US deaths.

We're dying now stupid. Might as well face reality, take the fucking gloves off, have the blood bath, and walk away victorious knowing peace wil remain for at least another several decades until a new wave of idiots who never saw our devastating power first hand, rises up.