Obama is the Example of how Not to Govern

I agree with Gardiner. The last thing Cameron would want to do is emulate our Socialist-In-Chief. Frankly, Obama's put us on the path to where they are right now, with their economy in ruins and their freedoms endangered.

It's going to be a thankless task for Cameron though, and there appears to be some doubt as to whether he's up to it when you read through the comments section. But they could hardly do worse than they have up to now. Hell, they've got little old ladies being put on house arrest for selling goldfish:
Great-grandmother is tagged for selling a goldfish | Mail Online
Woman Fined, Put Under House Arrest For Selling Goldfish To 14-Year-Old - Starpulse.com

And preachers arrested for the content of their speech:
Christian preacher on hooligan charge after saying he believes that homosexuality is a sin | Mail Online

They've got people who are unabashedly milking the welfare system, because they make more money from having babies than from working. And they feel no remorse for deliberately planning for families that they KNOW the taxpayer will have to support:
Peter Davey gets £42,000 in benefits a year and drives a Mercedes | Mail Online


All in all, they guy's going to have an uphill battle. He's going to have to reign in welfare spending and that's never popular... as we see in Greece today. But, he might gain more approval if while he takes with one hand, he gives with the other. These people need their freedom of speech back and they need a common sense approach to law and order which doesn't result in petty prosecutions.
 
Last edited:
President Obama’s first 16 months in office provide an important lesson for the next British Prime Minister in how not to run the country..
.....But, he's not an Award Winner, like LIL' DUMBYA BUSH!!!

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tmsj59FrhFw]YouTube - Bill Maher says "George Bush is the Worst President Ever!"[/ame]​
 
Conservatives in Britain would be RINO's here.

Conservatives in Britain now are what American Conservatives will be a generation or so from now,

because conservatism always loses and always gets more liberal than it was in the past.
 
This administration is what you get when the check and balances have be removed and replaced with big government and bureaucracy .It is plain tyranny.
 
Conservatives in Britain would be RINO's here.

Conservatives in Britain now are what American Conservatives will be a generation or so from now,

because conservatism always loses and always gets more liberal than it was in the past.

You obviously have no idea how Conservatives are in Britain, in fact, in Eastern Europe.

And then your the person who says Socialism works well in Europe.. :lol: Doesn't look like we can take your word for much.


Conservatism always looses? sure, that's an Opinion. Your Opinion. Not a fact.
 
Conservatives in Britain would be RINO's here.

Conservatives in Britain now are what American Conservatives will be a generation or so from now,

because conservatism always loses and always gets more liberal than it was in the past.

You obviously have no idea how Conservatives are in Britain, in fact, in Eastern Europe.

And then your the person who says Socialism works well in Europe.. :lol: Doesn't look like we can take your word for much.


Conservatism always looses? sure, that's an Opinion. Your Opinion. Not a fact.

___

Yeah, our neo progressives over here are working overtime attempting to spin what is happening in Europe - just as they did with Virginia, New Jersey, and "Ted Kennedy's seat".

November 2010 - it's gonna be BIG!!!!!!
 
This administration is what you get when the check and balances have be removed and replaced with big government and bureaucracy .It is plain tyranny.

___

Not so long ago I would have considered the term tyranny to be too strong.

Not any longer...
 
____

Agreed.

Imagine Obama attempting such discourse minus teleprompted messaging? :lol:


He'd need a bunch of CORPSEMEN to drag him away after he fell apart.
 
This administration is what you get when the check and balances have be removed and replaced with big government and bureaucracy .It is plain tyranny.

___

Not so long ago I would have considered the term tyranny to be too strong.

Not any longer...


We are being taken over by a Soft Tyranny.
 
____

Agreed.

Imagine Obama attempting such discourse minus teleprompted messaging? :lol:


He'd need a bunch of CORPSEMEN to drag him away after he fell apart.

Yet somehow he had no difficulty in dispensing with John McCain in the Presidential debates or the Republican Senate caucus in the Healthcare summit
 
Yet somehow he had no difficulty in dispensing with John McCain in the Presidential debates or the Republican Senate caucus in the Healthcare summit

Sorry.... but he looked like the nasty Chicago thug he IS at the so-called "healthcare summit". It was nothing but a political ploy where he hoped to make it look like he was willing to negotiate for the sake of fooling people who don't follow politics closely.

And as far as his appearances in debate with John McCain and Hillary Clinton, the asshole lied his way through every one of them. Or have we forgotten, for one example, that he was against "individual mandates" before he was for them? :rolleyes:
 
Yet somehow he had no difficulty in dispensing with John McCain in the Presidential debates or the Republican Senate caucus in the Healthcare summit

Sorry.... but he looked like the nasty Chicago thug he IS at the so-called "healthcare summit". It was nothing but a political ploy where he hoped to make it look like he was willing to negotiate for the sake of fooling people who don't follow politics closely.

And as far as his appearances in debate with John McCain and Hillary Clinton, the asshole lied his way through every one of them. Or have we forgotten, for one example, that he was against "individual mandates" before he was for them? :rolleyes:

"nasty Chicago thug"

"asshole"

And you say you follow politics closely? Fool.
 
And with Cameron having quoted Reagan directly, it appears he is already sending a message to Obama that it will no longer be liberal business as usual with our British allies.

The significance of the British elections has yet to be fully realized - but it will be soon
.

___

Tory party candidate for prime minister, David Cameron spoke to a group of small business leaders in England. He gave a rousing speech about change, but the positive change that betters society, not the kind Gordon Brown, Nick Clegg, and frankly Obama has done in the US. He quoted President Ronald Reagan, “The status quo is Latin for ‘the mess we’re in’.” Instead of voting for liberals that have brought down British society with their leadership, conservatism can give rise to a new, prosperous England.

____

David Cameron to small business leaders: Quotes Reagan and says “If you want change, vote conservative” Cubachi

Do you think once they are Conservative, they will attack us again?

Obama made them his enemy. Treated their representatives like shit.

This is his doing.

Anybody who sided with us in the war on terror got the same treatment.
 
Last edited:
And with Cameron having quoted Reagan directly, it appears he is already sending a message to Obama that it will no longer be liberal business as usual with our British allies.

The significance of the British elections has yet to be fully realized - but it will be soon
.

___

Tory party candidate for prime minister, David Cameron spoke to a group of small business leaders in England. He gave a rousing speech about change, but the positive change that betters society, not the kind Gordon Brown, Nick Clegg, and frankly Obama has done in the US. He quoted President Ronald Reagan, “The status quo is Latin for ‘the mess we’re in’.” Instead of voting for liberals that have brought down British society with their leadership, conservatism can give rise to a new, prosperous England.

____

David Cameron to small business leaders: Quotes Reagan and says “If you want change, vote conservative” Cubachi

Do you think once they are Conservative, they will attack us again?

Obama made them his enemy. Treated their representatives like shit.

This is his doing.

Anybody who sided with us in the war on terror got the same treatment.

Words like "War on Terror" are rediculous. Invading two countries in this stupid "war" did nothing to prevent a complete idiot from going back and forth to Pakistan and coming back to NY and placing an SUV in Times Square. The problem is not Obama. It is you and people like you that support rediculous and ultimately dangerous policies. The problem is assholes that are far more interested in tearing down Obama than dismantling Al Quiada.
 
Do you think once they are Conservative, they will attack us again?

Obama made them his enemy. Treated their representatives like shit.

This is his doing.

Anybody who sided with us in the war on terror got the same treatment.

Words like "War on Terror" are rediculous. Invading two countries in this stupid "war" did nothing to prevent a complete idiot from going back and forth to Pakistan and coming back to NY and placing an SUV in Times Square. The problem is not Obama. It is you and people like you that support rediculous and ultimately dangerous policies. The problem is assholes that are far more interested in tearing down Obama than dismantling Al Quiada.

Case and point of how being "nice" worked with the Times Square suspect and everyone else who has blown up innocent people all over the world since Obama's Cairo speech.
 
Yet somehow he had no difficulty in dispensing with John McCain in the Presidential debates or the Republican Senate caucus in the Healthcare summit


In the first case, McCain is not a contender, and never was.

In the second case, Paul Ryan totally owned Obama.
 

Forum List

Back
Top