Obama is Officially Held in Contempt Over Drilling “Permitorium”

I wonder if contempt of court qualifies as high crimes and misdemeanors. I am not positive it does.

Me either. It is not even a criminal offense, and Obama is far from the first president to ignore a court order he did not like. I don't recall anyone else ever being impeached for it.

You guys are to rich. Contempt of Court is an Impeachable offense.

To have the President ignoring a court ruling is in fact a serious affront to our System of Government. The President is not above the Law, and the Courts are a Branch of the Government = to the Executive. Not subject to it.

It is extremely funny to me to see all you lefties defending Obama. Had Bush been held in Contempt of a high court. You people would have rabidly called for his impeachment.
 
I wonder if contempt of court qualifies as high crimes and misdemeanors. I am not positive it does.

Me either. It is not even a criminal offense, and Obama is far from the first president to ignore a court order he did not like. I don't recall anyone else ever being impeached for it.

You guys are to rich. Contempt of Court is an Impeachable offense.

To have the President ignoring a court ruling is in fact a serious affront to our System of Government. The President is not above the Law, and the Courts are a Branch of the Government = to the Executive. Not subject to it.

It is extremely funny to me to see all you lefties defending Obama. Had Bush been held in Contempt of a high court. You people would have rabidly called for his impeachment.


Correct. Equal but separate branches. The executive cannot ignore the court and I don't care how many times it's been done in the past.
 
Obama is in contempt?

Time to ramp up the impeachment proceedings. What is Ken Starr up to these days?
 
Obama is in contempt?

Time to ramp up the impeachment proceedings. What is Ken Starr up to these days?

It really does not matter whether or not there are actually proceedings. All this illustrates is, what I have said for some time, Obama has no respect for the Constitution. He sees it as Something in the way of his Ideas. Something that is flawed and therefore not important. Something to be overcome, not followed.

So Basically, nothing new here, just more of the same.
 
Obama is in contempt?

Time to ramp up the impeachment proceedings. What is Ken Starr up to these days?

It really does not matter whether or not there are actually proceedings. All this illustrates is, what I have said for some time, Obama has no respect for the Constitution. He sees it as Something in the way of his Ideas. Something that is flawed and therefore not important. Something to be overcome, not followed.

So Basically, nothing new here, just more of the same.

And he belies the Oath that he took...but then what Statist ever takes a solemn oath and means it, takes it to heart?
 
I wonder if contempt of court qualifies as high crimes and misdemeanors. I am not positive it does.

Me either. It is not even a criminal offense, and Obama is far from the first president to ignore a court order he did not like. I don't recall anyone else ever being impeached for it.

You guys are to rich. Contempt of Court is an Impeachable offense.

To have the President ignoring a court ruling is in fact a serious affront to our System of Government. The President is not above the Law, and the Courts are a Branch of the Government = to the Executive. Not subject to it.

It is extremely funny to me to see all you lefties defending Obama. Had Bush been held in Contempt of a high court. You people would have rabidly called for his impeachment.

Either you should have paid more attention in your civics and history classes or your parents should get a refund on their taxes. Andrew Jackson ignored an order of the Supreme Court when he forced the Cherokees to move west of the Mississippi.
 
There has been a movement to impeach Obama from the day he took office!!! Give it up. He won the election fair and square. Get over it.

a movement? A fringe group of people are a movement?

Call it what you want. But it has been constant and the nuts are plentiful.

Kinda like the birthers.

Or the truthers.

Or the nuts that wanted to impeach Bush, and just about every other President in history. Do you have a point. or do you just like to see your name next to posts?
 
Not exactly. The press asked Press Secretary Gibbs and Obama a ton of questions about the fact that he ignored that court order. Therefore Salazar cant act as a stooge and take the fall of the O man as Obama claims that he knew nothing. Obama cant claim ignorance on an high profile event that he claimed to be so on top of. Therefore he is just as guilty.

Doesn't mean they won't have Salazar be the fall guy. If worst comes to worst Salazar will resign

Nah. If he resigns then Obama cant claim executive privilage over his actions. But he sure can plead the hell out of the 5th. He'll stay.

Oh yeah...He won't have to answer for it... I'm not saying that Obama knew, but if he did, he'll get away with it. He's the greatest thing since sliced bread...:rolleyes:
 
once gain repukes prove they will try anything to overturn an election where they god thgeir asses handed to them

???? Not that I'm here nor there, but did you happen to catch a glimpse of the last congressional election? Talk about getting asses handed... The dems just got their asses whooped...FACT
 
Republicans have controlled the House for a month now and have not started to impeach Obama yet

What a bunch of pussies.
 
Bush and the Republicans are the cause of a failed economy and the deaths of thousands of Americans and the maiming of tens of thousands of Americans ruining countless lives and they pray Obama goes to jail for stopping foreign companies from drilling for oil only a short time after a foreign oil company devastated our entire gulf coast.

Is that about right?
Dodd, Frank and the dimwits along with fannie and freddie are the cause of the economic colapse, get that straight. Obama has done worse with a failed stimulus and the socialist obamacare bill.
 
once gain repukes prove they will try anything to overturn an election where they god thgeir asses handed to them
The dimwits got their asses handed to them in the last election because they proved they were everything that we said they were and they weren't anything they said they were. Socialists.
 
I wonder if contempt of court qualifies as high crimes and misdemeanors. I am not positive it does.

Gerald Ford famously once said that high crimes and misdemeanors is whatever the House determines it to be. I'm paraphrasing here but the idea is that if the House decides to draft the articles, it becomes an impeachable offence.

I'd point out though, that simply ignoring the Court's rulings is one of the few checks the Executive has on the Judicial. If Congress thinks the Executive has gone too far in disregarding the Judicial, then their check on the Executive is impeachment.

EDIT: For the record I think the OP's push for an Obama impeachment is just as sad as the Left's push for Articles of Impeachment for Bush. It's probably sadder than the folks that pushed for and actually did impeach Slick Willie.
 
Last edited:
Either you should have paid more attention in your civics and history classes or your parents should get a refund on their taxes. Andrew Jackson ignored an order of the Supreme Court when he forced the Cherokees to move west of the Mississippi.

Isn't he the one who famously said "Let the Courts enforce their own ruling."

But yeah, that particular incident is always the first one I go to when it comes to the Executive versus the Judicial. The ability to ignore a ruling is a check on the Judicial. If the two come to deadlock as seperate and equal branches of government, then it comes down to the Legislative to decide whether to weild their powers of impeachment against either the Judicial or the Executive.

That's why you always have 3 in order to get balance. Any two are equal, meaning the 3rd has to weigh in to break deadlock.
 
Either you should have paid more attention in your civics and history classes or your parents should get a refund on their taxes. Andrew Jackson ignored an order of the Supreme Court when he forced the Cherokees to move west of the Mississippi.

Isn't he the one who famously said "Let the Courts enforce their own ruling."

But yeah, that particular incident is always the first one I go to when it comes to the Executive versus the Judicial. The ability to ignore a ruling is a check on the Judicial. If the two come to deadlock as seperate and equal branches of government, then it comes down to the Legislative to decide whether to weild their powers of impeachment against either the Judicial or the Executive.

That's why you always have 3 in order to get balance. Any two are equal, meaning the 3rd has to weigh in to break deadlock.

The quote is probably apocryphal, but appropriate.

The only real power the Executive has is to ignore the other branches. That is the primary reason Congress started using earmarks, because the executive was ignoring their intent and spending money in different places. I don't understand why people get all bent out of shape when one branch of the government exercises its power. As you pointed out, if the Executive gets carried away with ignoring them Congress can always put him on trial.
 
The only real power the Executive has is to ignore the other branches. That is the primary reason Congress started using earmarks, because the executive was ignoring their intent and spending money in different places

Please, they started earmarks to buy votes. Which is what they use it for now.
 

Forum List

Back
Top