Obama Is NOT for the Working Man

WillowTree

Diamond Member
Sep 15, 2008
84,532
16,091
2,180
He's only for the UNION man.



[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ETg6MONZalI]A Few More Of The 23 Million - YouTube[/ame]
 
Of course he is only for the union workers. Look how much money is given too him for his elections through the unions..
 
The Obama's are worth 10 million. I think that makes him rich. And ask for a link I dare you cuz I've got one.
 
So ... the GOP and their policies run the economy into the ground. Obama comes in and says he can save some of the jobs, and the GOP vehemently oppose him and vote no at every attempt (assuming they allow a vote). Obama gets some policies passed and saves some auto industry jobs.

And now the GOP has the nerve to attack Obama for not saving ALL the jobs?

Please GOP. Run on that platform.
 
So ... the GOP and their policies run the economy into the ground. Obama comes in and says he can save some of the jobs, and the GOP vehemently oppose him and vote no at every attempt (assuming they allow a vote). Obama gets some policies passed and saves some auto industry jobs.

And now the GOP has the nerve to attack Obama for not saving ALL the jobs?

Please GOP. Run on that platform.

and in the mean time Obama has an ad for Romney the cause of 750 people losing jobs and he saved way more .. But of course you wont hear that from the left.. Even though Romney wasnt with Bane when it happened.. You guys are so hypocritical. At least Romney did not use TAX PAYERS MONEY to save jobs:cuckoo: for unions that I dont even agree with and a lot of America does not agree with
 
Obama Is NOT for the Working Man

NOne of the candidates are. For president or congress.

No, Paul was... Thing is he actually held a job for most of his life. A real job, not a "I make money off my money" job.



He is for corporations over the workers.

Does he support workers collectively bargaining with their employers?
Minimum wage?
Socialized health care?

Or does he support deregulating labor laws?
No minimum wage?
No collective worker bargaining?
Private health ins?
 
Last edited:
As if union workers don't count! What's with the notion among the unilluminated Conservatives that corporations, and only corporations know what's best fort the American worker? As if these saintly corporations shower working families with all the benefits due them out of some magical vault.

Union workers work hard. They work safe. They are able to actually raise a family, buy a home and afford to furnish, heat and maintain it. What's wrong with having disposable income? It's what drives the economy. Corporate wealth does not drive the economy. Consumer spending does.

So long as Conservatives utterly fail to understand this basic fact, they will continue to rail against working families in the hope that their disdain will win the hearts of some board room executives. While those same executives have nothing on their minds but higher stock prices so their own bonuses can be rationalized.
 
So ... the GOP and their policies run the economy into the ground. Obama comes in and says he can save some of the jobs, and the GOP vehemently oppose him and vote no at every attempt (assuming they allow a vote). Obama gets some policies passed and saves some auto industry jobs.

And now the GOP has the nerve to attack Obama for not saving ALL the jobs?

Please GOP. Run on that platform.

Sadly most of GOP's base don't care to remember the recent past or just how shitty the economy was in Jan 09.
 
So ... the GOP and their policies run the economy into the ground. Obama comes in and says he can save some of the jobs, and the GOP vehemently oppose him and vote no at every attempt (assuming they allow a vote). Obama gets some policies passed and saves some auto industry jobs.

And now the GOP has the nerve to attack Obama for not saving ALL the jobs?

Please GOP. Run on that platform.

and in the mean time Obama has an ad for Romney the cause of 750 people losing jobs and he saved way more .. But of course you wont hear that from the left.. Even though Romney wasnt with Bane when it happened.. You guys are so hypocritical. At least Romney did not use TAX PAYERS MONEY to save jobs:cuckoo: for unions that I dont even agree with and a lot of America does not agree with

You don't agree with using tax payer money to save the jobs of tax payers?

Again, please GOP, run on that.
 
Obama Is NOT for the Working Man

NOne of the candidates are. For president or congress.

No, Paul was... Thing is he actually held a job for most of his life. A real job, not a "I make money off my money" job.



He is for corporations over the workers.

Why, because he was against TARP, the Stimulus and anything that gave tax payer money to corporations/banks that were shit and fucked people out of their life saving? While Paul was giving speeches on the house floor telling people how tis would play out, how it would fuck the little guy the dude you voted for was busy handing that tax payer money to his "friends" that he was in debt to.

Just because Obama turned out like Bush and you're bitter does not make everyone who is a politician bad, especially when they have a record near 100 opposite as you claim.

But in the end that is why this is a dumb ass thread. It’s trolling. While Willo bashes Obama he supports Mitt who supported near everything Obama did on the economy… These are standardless partisan hacks who hate themselves when it comes to their own definitions.
 
So ... the GOP and their policies run the economy into the ground. Obama comes in and says he can save some of the jobs, and the GOP vehemently oppose him and vote no at every attempt (assuming they allow a vote). Obama gets some policies passed and saves some auto industry jobs.

And now the GOP has the nerve to attack Obama for not saving ALL the jobs?

Please GOP. Run on that platform.

and in the mean time Obama has an ad for Romney the cause of 750 people losing jobs and he saved way more .. But of course you wont hear that from the left.. Even though Romney wasnt with Bane when it happened.. You guys are so hypocritical. At least Romney did not use TAX PAYERS MONEY to save jobs:cuckoo: for unions that I dont even agree with and a lot of America does not agree with

You don't agree with using tax payer money to save the jobs of tax payers?

Again, please GOP, run on that.

If Government could just spend money and create jobs and a healthy economy don't you think it would have been done by now? Oh it has, millions end up dying when it all falls apart. And yes there is a process, things work for some time, but it always gets worse and worse until a mammoth collapse.
 
So ... the GOP and their policies run the economy into the ground. Obama comes in and says he can save some of the jobs, and the GOP vehemently oppose him and vote no at every attempt (assuming they allow a vote). Obama gets some policies passed and saves some auto industry jobs.

And now the GOP has the nerve to attack Obama for not saving ALL the jobs?

Please GOP. Run on that platform.

Already trying to change history? Obama came in and more people lost their jobs. Obama came in and people are still massively out of work despite his promises.

Republicans on the other hand come into power in the House. Past countless bills that will increase job growth in the United States. Those people are now being ignored by Harry Reid in the Senate.

So you really want to run on this? Especially when Obama went out of his way to oppose the pipeline which required absolutely no government funds and would have produced thousands of jobs in multiple states? And when he is running against a man who made millions of dollars helping businesses become profitable and create jobs? This is your strategy?
 
So ... the GOP and their policies run the economy into the ground. Obama comes in and says he can save some of the jobs, and the GOP vehemently oppose him and vote no at every attempt (assuming they allow a vote). Obama gets some policies passed and saves some auto industry jobs.

And now the GOP has the nerve to attack Obama for not saving ALL the jobs?

Please GOP. Run on that platform.

Already trying to change history? Obama came in and more people lost their jobs. Obama came in and people are still massively out of work despite his promises.

Republicans on the other hand come into power in the House. Past countless bills that will increase job growth in the United States. Those people are now being ignored by Harry Reid in the Senate.

So you really want to run on this? Especially when Obama went out of his way to oppose the pipeline which required absolutely no government funds and would have produced thousands of jobs in multiple states? And when he is running against a man who made millions of dollars helping businesses become profitable and create jobs? This is your strategy?

Name one job creating bill the GOP controlled House passed since 2010.
 

Forum List

Back
Top