Obama: "I Actually Believe In Redistribution"

Obama In 1998: "I Actually Believe In Redistribution" - YouTube

Yep...

And if the "Free Press" didn't agree with it, they would be Brutalizing him with it like they are Romney right now over the 47% tape... :thup:

:)

peace...
Come on, after all the times Willard has taken Obama out of context how can you be stupid and gullible enough to swallow this bullshit????

In the unedited version it was obvious Obama was talking about DECENTRALIZING RESOURCE DELIVERY!!!!!!

Obama: “How do we pool resources at the same time as we decentralize delivery systems in ways that both foster competition, can work in the marketplace, and can foster innovation at the local level and can be tailored to particular communities?”

Only an idiot lib would swallow such political double speak blather.
 
Obama In 1998: "I Actually Believe In Redistribution" - YouTube

Yep...

And if the "Free Press" didn't agree with it, they would be Brutalizing him with it like they are Romney right now over the 47% tape... :thup:

:)

peace...
Come on, after all the times Willard has taken Obama out of context how can you be stupid and gullible enough to swallow this bullshit????

In the unedited version it was obvious Obama was talking about DECENTRALIZING RESOURCE DELIVERY!!!!!!

Obama: “How do we pool resources at the same time as we decentralize delivery systems in ways that both foster competition, can work in the marketplace, and can foster innovation at the local level and can be tailored to particular communities?”

Only an idiot lib would swallow such political double speak blather.
Only the CON$ervoFascist Brotherhood would continue to lie in the face of the truth. If the dishonestly edited part didn't change the context, pathological liar Willard would not have edited it out!!!

The full quote with the edited part highlighted:

OBAMA: “I think the trick is figuring out how do we structure government systems that pool resources and hence facilitate some redistribution because I actually believe in redistribution, at least at a certain level to make sure that everybody’s got a shot. How do we pool resources at the same time as we decentralize delivery systems in ways that both foster competition, can work in the marketplace, and can foster innovation at the local level and can be tailored to particular communities?”
 
3. The context of it..is totally in keeping with the Constitution of the United States. Stated in the preamble..as the mission statment.

Jebus Tights...

Are you being Seriously with that "General Welfare" thing?...

What were the Policies and Laws Inacted by the Founders that Support they they Supported a Welfare State.

I'll be here.

:)

peace...

PROMOTE the General Welfare. Not PROVIDE the General Welfare. Big difference between promoting something and providing it.
What many
Your right. The FF would turn over in their graves if they could see the entitlments in this country. Our Govt paying people to have kids and paying their bills with tax dollars. Coronary city for the FF.

These are the same guys who pitched a fit when someone wanted our new Govt to give French settlers 15 grand to help them start out in America. The same French who helped us win our Revolution.

Once the public learns it can draw funds from the public largess the Republic is doomed.

Our FF were a tough bunch and way smarter than the current DC Clowns.

Welfare, for the general public was a responsiblity of the state governments, welfare for business and manufacturing was a responsiblity of both states and national governments. During the Great Depression the national government too over the state responsiblities.
 
But....but....but Romney said something about most Obamination supporters are leaches, that's more important for the media than the POTUS telling us he is a socialist.....
 
What the president said, if you bother to listen, is that he believes in redistribution to some extent.

Who doesn't?
Who doesn't? Most people who work for a living. We don't want government making laws to benefit itself and using that benefit for the sole purpose of creating a permanent voting bloc for themselves.
 
What the president said, if you bother to listen, is that he believes in redistribution to some extent.

Who doesn't?

I noticed that NBC got the rest of that Audio out as fast as they could... :lol:

I will take the what I know about Obama and his Past and his Connections and then Judge ALL of what he has said and done...

And at his Core, he is a Socialist.

Luckily he's not King. :thup:

:)

peace...
I believe Obama's ego is so large, he views himself as an elected King.
Look at his record of bypassing Congress. He has done this numerous times. He did so just because Congress would not "go along" with his wishes...HIS WISHES....
 
Every nation redistributes its wealth. Can anyone name a country that doesn't redistrubte its wealth? In fact, many economic textbooks list redistribution of wealth as one the functions of government. How a nation redistributes its wealth is a responsibility of its economic system, government policies and economic conditions. England was heavy into the new world's economic system and as soon as the ink was dry on our new Constitution the government was involved in the new economy, at first helping business, then regulating business and in the Great Depression helping people. "Redistibution of Wealth" has now become a code word for the helping of people not business.

No it does not...The left has confused terms to satisfy their agenda which is equality of outcome.
Taxation, a necessary tool to fund government is NOT redistribution of wealth.
Redistribution is the taking of funds under threat of government sanctions to give to those in protected classes.
The left throws around the word "help" and twists that term into meaning "entitlement".
 
Come on, after all the times Willard has taken Obama out of context how can you be stupid and gullible enough to swallow this bullshit????

In the unedited version it was obvious Obama was talking about DECENTRALIZING RESOURCE DELIVERY!!!!!!

Obama: “How do we pool resources at the same time as we decentralize delivery systems in ways that both foster competition, can work in the marketplace, and can foster innovation at the local level and can be tailored to particular communities?”

Only an idiot lib would swallow such political double speak blather.
Only the CON$ervoFascist Brotherhood would continue to lie in the face of the truth. If the dishonestly edited part didn't change the context, pathological liar Willard would not have edited it out!!!

The full quote with the edited part highlighted:

OBAMA: “I think the trick is figuring out how do we structure government systems that pool resources and hence facilitate some redistribution because I actually believe in redistribution, at least at a certain level to make sure that everybody’s got a shot. How do we pool resources at the same time as we decentralize delivery systems in ways that both foster competition, can work in the marketplace, and can foster innovation at the local level and can be tailored to particular communities?”

He said he believes in redistribution in the short quote or the full version. It's all the same.
Obama views the US as an "unfair" country because there are those who work harder( or smarter) achieve more and find success.
That concept, that reality just eats away at the insides of those on the political left.
What makes you people think you are entitled to the earnings of others?
Where do you get the gall to assume "what's mine is mine and what isn't should be"?
You people are selfish arrogant and greedy. When you enter a room, your envy got there 20 minutes before hand.
Newsflash....Nobody owes you a fuckin thing!
 
Every nation redistributes its wealth. Can anyone name a country that doesn't redistrubte its wealth? In fact, many economic textbooks list redistribution of wealth as one the functions of government. How a nation redistributes its wealth is a responsibility of its economic system, government policies and economic conditions. England was heavy into the new world's economic system and as soon as the ink was dry on our new Constitution the government was involved in the new economy, at first helping business, then regulating business and in the Great Depression helping people. "Redistibution of Wealth" has now become a code word for the helping of people not business.

No it does not...The left has confused terms to satisfy their agenda which is equality of outcome.
Taxation, a necessary tool to fund government is NOT redistribution of wealth.
Redistribution is the taking of funds under threat of government sanctions to give to those in protected classes.
The left throws around the word "help" and twists that term into meaning "entitlement".

Republicans have so many code words meaning something evil like redistribution of wealth and now entitlements. Both are supposedly evil practices but what in fact are they, for example what are entitlements? Is Social Security an entitlement, what of militiary disability compensation, what of pensions, how about tax refunds Congressional salaries?
 
Every nation redistributes its wealth. Can anyone name a country that doesn't redistrubte its wealth? In fact, many economic textbooks list redistribution of wealth as one the functions of government. How a nation redistributes its wealth is a responsibility of its economic system, government policies and economic conditions. England was heavy into the new world's economic system and as soon as the ink was dry on our new Constitution the government was involved in the new economy, at first helping business, then regulating business and in the Great Depression helping people. "Redistibution of Wealth" has now become a code word for the helping of people not business.

No it does not...The left has confused terms to satisfy their agenda which is equality of outcome.
Taxation, a necessary tool to fund government is NOT redistribution of wealth.
Redistribution is the taking of funds under threat of government sanctions to give to those in protected classes.
The left throws around the word "help" and twists that term into meaning "entitlement".

Republicans have so many code words meaning something evil like redistribution of wealth and now entitlements. Both are supposedly evil practices but what in fact are they, for example what are entitlements? Is Social Security an entitlement, what of militiary disability compensation, what of pensions, how about tax refunds Congressional salaries?
Two words...Social spending. It's 50% of the budget. Out of control and wracked with waste fraud and abuse.
Social security at one time was a benefit to be returned to the individual upon retirement. Because the federal government now has full and absolute discretion to spend social security money. That makes SS a TAX. There is no SS Trust fund. No one has an "account".
Government pensions? Should not exist. Let the workers contribute to a 401k or Individual retirement funds just like those of us in the private sector. There is no reason for the taxpayers to be paying people NOT to work. No public sector worker should get a better deal than those in the private sector. It is an absolute joke that a Senator must serve just two terms and a House member just 6 ( 12 years each) to receive full pension....

.Thanks for playing. Next!
 
70_zps0a96dc51.jpg
 
But....but....but Romney said something about most Obamination supporters are leaches, that's more important for the media than the POTUS telling us he is a socialist.....

The stock market just hit a 4 year high.

The Fortune 500 just recorded record profits.

If Obama is a socialist. He's a really bad one.
 
Romney pays 14% on his taxes.

I pay 25%.

This is the real redistribution of wealth in America.....welfare for the wealthy.
 

Forum List

Back
Top