CDZ Obama, Hillary, Trump, Fake News, Mueller, The Swamp.....

Discussion in 'Clean Debate Zone' started by Mac1958, Aug 9, 2018.

  1. oldsoul
    Offline

    oldsoul Gold Member

    Joined:
    Oct 12, 2015
    Messages:
    2,654
    Thanks Received:
    394
    Trophy Points:
    140
    Location:
    East side of Spoon Lake
    Ratings:
    +1,389
    You have got to be joking. You want me to believe that Jimmy Kimmel actually goes out and gives an accurate representation of the average american in these? It's called satire, look it up. He is doing it for comedic effect. It has little basis in fact. How many people do you thing he "interviewed" for that segment? 10? 20? 50? 100? Admittedly, I did not watch it, I don't have to, I am familiar with how these things work. This has been done for decades, anyone foolish enough to think it gives an accurate representation have their blinders on.

    And you have the nerve to explicitly say that the average joe can't tell the difference between fact and edited drama. Wow.
     
  2. Tumblin Tumbleweed
    Offline

    Tumblin Tumbleweed Gold Member

    Joined:
    Mar 16, 2015
    Messages:
    1,887
    Thanks Received:
    161
    Trophy Points:
    140
    Ratings:
    +957
    Internet anonymity. People are saying generally stupid, divisive shit on the innert00bs/social media because there's little to no accountability yet. This cancer is melting our brains, quickly dumbing down the masses. Gone are the days when we minded our own business. Nowadays someone always believes he/she knows better than you what you should be doing, and should you dare to disagree/go your own way, you deserve scorn. We applaud narcissism. This is apparent by who we elected to lead the country.

    The current political environment is akin to most sporting events. The actual facts/issues/policies are much less important than whatever narrative the sports fans project to be important. These cliques of dumb fucks have dominated the national conversation, preventing any meaningful discourse. The extremists for both teams use the same schoolyard techniques to try and 'own' each other. With the internet, their bullhorns are miles wide.

    Meanwhile, in the White House and Congress, nothing of substance gets done. MAGA!
     
    • Agree Agree x 2
  3. Mac1958
    Offline

    Mac1958 Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Dec 8, 2011
    Messages:
    50,850
    Thanks Received:
    9,865
    Trophy Points:
    2,060
    Location:
    Independent Ave.
    Ratings:
    +42,060
    :clap:
    .
     
  4. candycorn
    Offline

    candycorn Alis volat propriis

    Joined:
    Aug 25, 2009
    Messages:
    46,857
    Thanks Received:
    5,527
    Trophy Points:
    1,830
    Ratings:
    +18,052
    If that is what I thought, surely you could quote me as saying that an elected official needs to be an expert in subject matter. If they wish to effectively serve their constituents, they do need to be an expert in politics. Otherwise they are outmaneuvered by ones who are better; just like bad lawyers lose to good lawyers, bad tennis players lose to good ones, and restaurants with bad chefs don’t stay open longer in favor of places that have good chefs.

    It’s fine to have good people around you. It’s better to have good people around you and have some chops yourself. We saw what happened with the blob. Essentially, the last person to talk to him has more influence than the other voices. When he has to operate on his own; you have him saluting Korean Generals, apologizing to foreign leaders, calling white nationalist “very fine people”.

    That you want the “average” to be making your political decisions is puzzling. I want an expert because I know the other guys are sending their experts.

    I don’t. In fact, I’m positive that many do.

    Knowing which buttons to push is helpful.
    Knowing the type of men who would come when you push them is helpful.
    Having some time in the water to know if the guy is bullshitting you is helpful.
    Knowing if what the button boys are proposing is remotely feasible (see $15 minimum wage for an example) if helpful.

    That is just the most glaring weakness of your “average joe”. The interior jungle is almost as treacherous to navigate because the “winners and losers” of what you are voting for will be your constituents not the major employers you’re helping or screwing.

    I would prefer someone with some time in the water who knows that everyone sitting in front of them is not there to lobby in the best interest of America and may have their own personal axe to grind, their own special interests, etc..
     
  5. candycorn
    Offline

    candycorn Alis volat propriis

    Joined:
    Aug 25, 2009
    Messages:
    46,857
    Thanks Received:
    5,527
    Trophy Points:
    1,830
    Ratings:
    +18,052
    Hence I wrote this:

    “I know this is edited for effect but here is evidence of the “average joes” at work:” It would be helpful if you would read the entire thing before comment.

    That being said….

    These people are average. Sorry. That you want to send the “average” to represent you is puzzling.
     
  6. oldsoul
    Offline

    oldsoul Gold Member

    Joined:
    Oct 12, 2015
    Messages:
    2,654
    Thanks Received:
    394
    Trophy Points:
    140
    Location:
    East side of Spoon Lake
    Ratings:
    +1,389
    I think we generally agree then. We need people who are capable of discerning good advice from bad; good/truthful/complete information from bad/untruthful/incomplete. Where we seem to have the disagreement is what level of "expertise" one must have to be able to be effective as a legislator. For me, the "rookie" is not optimal, nor is the person who has little to no "real world" experience in recent years. Somewhere in the middle is best. If pressed to put numbers on it I might say: From someone with at least one term in state level government (or equivalent) up to three terms in the House and/or two terms in the Senate (or any combination of the two). Beyond that, it seems as though people get too entrenched in the "Washington culture/swamp", and their objective becomes getting re-elected instead of serving their constituents and their best interests/desires.

    I also believe that any pay increase for congress should be ratified by a 2/3 majority of State legislative bodies. I seriously doubt this will happen, but I think it would go a long way towards taking the money out of national politics. Of course there is the lobbyist issue as well, but I think that is best left for another time.
     
  7. oldsoul
    Offline

    oldsoul Gold Member

    Joined:
    Oct 12, 2015
    Messages:
    2,654
    Thanks Received:
    394
    Trophy Points:
    140
    Location:
    East side of Spoon Lake
    Ratings:
    +1,389
    Actually, I did read the entire post before commenting, twice. I wanted to be sure I did not misread anything. Admitting it was "edited for effect" is different from acknowledging that this is not an accurate representation of reality. True, these are "average" people in that area. However, if I were to do a poll of income levels in Compton, it would be disingenuous for me to then say it is in any way an accurate representation of the whole of the LA metro, let alone the State of California, or the nation. This is essentially what you are doing, it seems.
     
  8. candycorn
    Offline

    candycorn Alis volat propriis

    Joined:
    Aug 25, 2009
    Messages:
    46,857
    Thanks Received:
    5,527
    Trophy Points:
    1,830
    Ratings:
    +18,052
    Fair enough.

    Do you think that Kimmel and his segment producers interviewed 535 people? I doubt it. Now, if you took the same camera, the same segment producers and put it in the Halls of the Capitol, and interviewed all of our elected officials, they would all know where Korea was--and knew it before they got elected. That is just one of many differences between the "average" and advanced citizenry.
     
  9. oldsoul
    Offline

    oldsoul Gold Member

    Joined:
    Oct 12, 2015
    Messages:
    2,654
    Thanks Received:
    394
    Trophy Points:
    140
    Location:
    East side of Spoon Lake
    Ratings:
    +1,389
    Ok, I'll give you that. One question though. In your opinion, who should determine whether or not a person is advanced enough to be a part of congress? No right or wrong answer, I am asking for your opinion.
     
  10. candycorn
    Offline

    candycorn Alis volat propriis

    Joined:
    Aug 25, 2009
    Messages:
    46,857
    Thanks Received:
    5,527
    Trophy Points:
    1,830
    Ratings:
    +18,052
    There is no difinitive answer to that question.
     

Share This Page

Search tags for this page

news