Obama first since Ike to win 51% twice

[Procrustes Stretched]

As a percentage of actual voters, more people voted in 2008 and 2012 than in 1980 and 1984.

What the hell does that mean?

go back to yoohoo blogs or whatever dumb fuck place you trolled in from

 

[FJO]

Check LBJ's destruction of Goldwater in 1964: 61 to 39%.

FDR's massacre of Landon in 1936: 60.8% of the vote and 523 to 8 electoral votes

FDR's stomp down of Hoover in 1932: 57.4% of the vote and 472 electoral votes.

Yeah, and then this Democrat icon, or more correctly this physical and mental RACIST defect and cripple went on and imprisoned American citizens of Japanese, German or Italian descent.

Glory to the Democrat Party!!

BTW, when did FDR capture all but one of the states as Reagan did in 1984?

 

[Meathead]

As a percentage of actual voters, more people voted in 2008 and 2012 than in 1980 and 1984.

What the hell does that mean?

go back to yoohoo blogs or whatever dumb fuck place you trolled in from

Again, what the hell does that mean? And what the hell is yoohoo?

 

[Procrustes Stretched]

Check LBJ's destruction of Goldwater in 1964: 61 to 39%.

FDR's massacre of Landon in 1936: 60.8% of the vote and 523 to 8 electoral votes

FDR's stomp down of Hoover in 1932: 57.4% of the vote and 472 electoral votes.

Yeah, and then this Democrat icon, or more correctly this physical and mental RACIST defect and cripple went on and imprisoned American citizens of Japanese, German or Italian descent.

Glory to the Democrat Party!!

BTW, when did FDR capture all but one of the states as Reagan did in 1984?

moron

 

[Procrustes Stretched]

What the hell does that mean?

go back to yoohoo blogs or whatever dumb fuck place you trolled in from

Again, what the hell does that mean? And what the hell is yoohoo?

usually mockery is a form of flattery, but in your case...

a higher percentage of eligible voters actually voted. It means more people chose to participate. It means one gets a percentage of a larger group of Americans which means one kind of mandate is much more representative of the peoples wishes than another.

 

[Procrustes Stretched]

Yoohoo? LOL

 

[FJO]

send this fool back to where it came from...

Reagan received far more than 51% in both his elections. You're a moron.

Reagan in 1980 won with 50.7% of the popular vote with only 52.6% of eligible voters voting. there was NEVER a popular mandate for Reagan in 1980. He won a landslide in the Electoral College vote but barley squeaked by in the popular vote. Reagan myths abound

Fools and morons include the OP: Ernie S. (Yesterday), LordBrownTrout (Yesterday), Mad Scientist (Yesterday), ShaklesOfBigGov (Today)

Obama 2008: he gets 52.9% of the popular vote with 61.6% (voting eligible) AND an Electoral Mandate ::: Electoral vote 365 vs 173

Obama 2012: 51.0% of the popular vote with 58.9% (voting eligible) still more people voting for Obama than did for Reagan

source: Wikipedia

Spin it any way you like, the number of voters who actually voted as opposed to the total number of eligible voters who voted has never been and never will be a yardstick about electorial success.

You must have been heavily in barley juice.

 

[JakeStarkey]

Check LBJ's destruction of Goldwater in 1964: 61 to 39%.

FDR's massacre of Landon in 1936: 60.8% of the vote and 523 to 8 electoral votes

FDR's stomp down of Hoover in 1932: 57.4% of the vote and 472 electoral votes.

Yeah, and then this Democrat icon, or more correctly this physical and mental RACIST defect and cripple went on and imprisoned American citizens of Japanese, German or Italian descent.

Glory to the Democrat Party!!

BTW, when did FDR capture all but one of the states as Reagan did in 1984?

 

[Procrustes Stretched]

send this fool back to where it came from...

Reagan received far more than 51% in both his elections. You're a moron.

Reagan in 1980 won with 50.7% of the popular vote with only 52.6% of eligible voters voting. there was NEVER a popular mandate for Reagan in 1980. He won a landslide in the Electoral College vote but barley squeaked by in the popular vote. Reagan myths abound

Fools and morons include the OP: Ernie S. (Yesterday), LordBrownTrout (Yesterday), Mad Scientist (Yesterday), ShaklesOfBigGov (Today)

Obama 2008: he gets 52.9% of the popular vote with 61.6% (voting eligible) AND an Electoral Mandate ::: Electoral vote 365 vs 173

Obama 2012: 51.0% of the popular vote with 58.9% (voting eligible) still more people voting for Obama than did for Reagan

source: Wikipedia

Spin it any way you like, the number of voters who actually voted as opposed to the total number of eligible voters who voted has never been and never will be a yardstick about electorial success.

You must have been heavily in barley juice.

One can win the Electoral College vote and lose the popular vote. That would equal no mandate.

The numbers of people who vote reflects more the popular will than does electoral success.

 

[FJO]

Check LBJ's destruction of Goldwater in 1964: 61 to 39%.

FDR's massacre of Landon in 1936: 60.8% of the vote and 523 to 8 electoral votes

FDR's stomp down of Hoover in 1932: 57.4% of the vote and 472 electoral votes.

Yeah, and then this Democrat icon, or more correctly this physical and mental RACIST defect and cripple went on and imprisoned American citizens of Japanese, German or Italian descent.

Glory to the Democrat Party!!

BTW, when did FDR capture all but one of the states as Reagan did in 1984?

moron

Thanks for your highly complimentary one word reply to my post which you obviously could not refute.

I hear that COSTCO, Wallmart, Sears and all other stores have excellent bargains on mirrors. Check them out and avail yourself to them - if as a typical liberal you are not too cheap - and buy one. You need one desperately before you post any more one word or any other posts.

 

[Luddly Neddite]

Where do you get your information nudley? From Huffington? Reagan won 50.7 in 1980 and a whopping 58% winning 49 states in a landslide in 1984.

Why not just read the link I included?

- or any of the other links.

Or, you could just make up numbers that suit your agenda.

 

[Luddly Neddite]

Obama first to win reelection with less votes than he got the first time.

Link.

 

[Meathead]

go back to yoohoo blogs or whatever dumb fuck place you trolled in from

Again, what the hell does that mean? And what the hell is yoohoo?

a higher percentage of eligible voters actually voted. It means more people chose to participate. It means one gets a percentage of a larger group of Americans which means one kind of mandate is much more representative of the peoples wishes than another.

"As a percentage of actual voters, more people voted in 2008 and 2012 than in 1980 and 1984."

Really, we were supposed to understand the latter as the former? And I'm the "dumb fuck?

 

[JakeStarkey]

Yeah, and then this Democrat icon, or more correctly this physical and mental RACIST defect and cripple went on and imprisoned American citizens of Japanese, German or Italian descent.

Glory to the Democrat Party!!

BTW, when did FDR capture all but one of the states as Reagan did in 1984?

moron

Thanks for your highly complimentary one word reply to my post which you obviously could not refute.

I hear that COSTCO, Wallmart, Sears and all other stores have excellent bargains on mirrors. Check them out and avail yourself to them - if as a typical liberal you are not too cheap - and buy one. You need one desperately before you post any more one word or any other posts.

Stop the hypocrisy, please. You get as you serve.

 

[Quantum Windbag]

Final Tally Shows Obama First Since

Barack Obama is the first president in more than five decades to win at least 51 percent of the national popular vote twice, according to a revised vote count in New York eight weeks after the Nov. 6 election.

rw's have said President Obama does not have a mandate. That's wishful thinking on their part.

Obama is the first president in history to win his second term with fewer votes than he got his first term, when are you going to start a thread about that?

 

[FJO]

Check LBJ's destruction of Goldwater in 1964: 61 to 39%.

FDR's massacre of Landon in 1936: 60.8% of the vote and 523 to 8 electoral votes

FDR's stomp down of Hoover in 1932: 57.4% of the vote and 472 electoral votes.

Yeah, and then this Democrat icon, or more correctly this physical and mental RACIST defect and cripple went on and imprisoned American citizens of Japanese, German or Italian descent.

Glory to the Democrat Party!!

BTW, when did FDR capture all but one of the states as Reagan did in 1984?

Another mentally deficient sorry puke who has no words of his own but has to rely on conveying his/her worthless ideas through the usage of emoticons.

 

[JakeStarkey]

Yeah, and then this Democrat icon, or more correctly this physical and mental RACIST defect and cripple went on and imprisoned American citizens of Japanese, German or Italian descent.

Glory to the Democrat Party!!

BTW, when did FDR capture all but one of the states as Reagan did in 1984?

Another mentally deficient sorry puke who has no words of his own but has to rely on conveying his/her worthless ideas through the usage of emoticons.

stop your hypocrisy, please; you are looking very stupid ~

 

[FJO]

moron

Thanks for your highly complimentary one word reply to my post which you obviously could not refute.

I hear that COSTCO, Wallmart, Sears and all other stores have excellent bargains on mirrors. Check them out and avail yourself to them - if as a typical liberal you are not too cheap - and buy one. You need one desperately before you post any more one word or any other posts.

Stop the hypocrisy, please. You get as you serve.

REALLY?

I never posted a one word reply to any post and certainly would never display mental disability by posting/using an emoticon.

 

[Ringel05]

What does any of this have to do in the real world other than trying, pathetically, to score political points? A 3 to 4% spread does not a mandate make, regardless of what party/politician one might support.

 

[JakeStarkey]

Anybody can go back and see where you posted and what you supported.

Stop the hypocrisy, please. Thinking people do not admire your post's barnyard smell.

Thanks for your highly complimentary one word reply to my post which you obviously could not refute.

I hear that COSTCO, Wallmart, Sears and all other stores have excellent bargains on mirrors. Check them out and avail yourself to them - if as a typical liberal you are not too cheap - and buy one. You need one desperately before you post any more one word or any other posts.

Stop the hypocrisy, please. You get as you serve.

REALLY?

I never posted a one word reply to any post and certainly would never display mental disability by posting/using an emoticom.