Discussion in 'Politics' started by Mr.Fitnah, Sep 24, 2009.
He wants to get rid of them.
I say we use them.
Hussein is overtly working to undermine the security of the US and the very world, by liimiting the scope and means of the US Nuclear arsenal, even while the forces of evil; the sworn enemies of the US are proliferating their own nuclear means.
It's treason... and it's treason on an unspeakable, unprecedented scale.
Obama is right.
We don't want Iran to have nukes.
So why should we have them?
On who? And why?
The good old "strenght as a deterrent argument" Many other countries have them and to keep them from launching one at us we need to make sure we have enough to destroy the world 10x over.
Reagan didn't like them either. He tried to get rid of them entirely
Yeah Im wrong, lets have a balance of weakness.
Im beginning to see the wisdom of the progressives .Govern with laws written by government funded cooperation and community organizers that go unread.
Government control over production of food while radical ecologist cut off the water to the farm lands.
Unilateral disarmament while underground labs build bombs .
I can't rep you again .
Separate names with a comma.