Obama does not state the 1967 border should be returned...

Because our Defense contractors would hate it... and you know how the Super Rich control things... right?

Oh yeah... you think they are just trying to make a better life for themselves... I keep forgetting.
 
Opinion piece
The oipnion of Israelis, not Obama haters.

Haaretz.Com


  • Published 21:25 19.05.11
  • Latest update 21:25 19.05.11
Obama granted Netanyahu a major diplomatic victory

After Obama accepted Netanyahu's demands, the PM now cannot be apathetic to the U.S. president's proposal for 1967 borders.

By Aluf Benn

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu can feel satisfied while flying to Washington Thursday night. U.S. President Barack Obama has granted Netanyahu a major diplomatic victory.

In return for his call for the establishment of a Palestinian state based on 1967 borders with agreed land swaps, without defining the size of these lands, Obama accepted Netanyahu's demands for strict security arrangements and a gradual, continuous withdrawal from the West Bank.
He suggested beginning negotiations on borders and security arrangements, and delaying discussions on the core issues such as Jerusalem and refugees.

More importantly, Obama scornfully rejected the Palestinian initiative to attain recognition at the United Nations and to isolate Israel, demanded the Palestinians return to negotiations, and called on Hamas to recognize Israel's right to exist. These points came straight out of the policy pages of the Prime Minister's Bureau in Jerusalem. Netanyahu could not have asked for more: Obama outright rejects Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas' recognition campaign, as well as the Palestinian reconciliation agreement.

It seems that the new Fatah-Hamas unity has saved Netanyahu from a much more aggressive and binding speech on the part of Obama.
Obama could have also delivered his Mideast speech during the impending AIPAC conference, which he will attend this coming Sunday.

His approach to Israel was empathetic, not only with his reassurance of the U.S. commitment to Israel's security but also with his attempt "to save Israel from itself." Obama warned us that if we perpetuated the occupation, we shall crash due to our demographic inferiority, new military technology, and most importantly, due to the anger of the masses who are slowly gaining power in the surrounding countries. In order to retain the vision of a Jewish and democratic state, Israel must end the occupation and withdraw from the West Bank.

The points of the speech were surely pleasing to Netanyahu's ears. Obama promised he won't force a deal on Israel and the Palestinians and demanded both sides to return to negotiations. He did not condemn, as he did before, the Israeli settlements in the territories as "illegitimate" and did not demand a settlement freeze. He only reminded, in a critical tone, that Israel continues building settlements, as an explanation for the deadlock in peace talks.

Netanyahu will have to reply to Obama by accepting the principle of "1967 borders with agreed land swaps." He made a step toward that direction in his speech in the Knesset this week, when he talked about preserving settlement blocs, which is the same thing in Israeli wording. On the eve of his U.S. trip, Netanyahu's advisers hinted that he will accept this principle on Friday during his close-room meeting with Obama, while presenting a less binding policy during his U.S. Congress speech on Tuesday in fear of causing the breakup of the coalition.

Netanyahu essentially has no choice: after Obama accepted his procedural and security demands, he cannot remain apathetic to the U.S. president's suggestion regarding borders. But Netanyahu has nothing to worry about – there is no chance the Palestinian leadership will agree to return to negotiations under these principles.
 
Why are we involved? What, other than putting a target on our backs, is achieved by meddling in the matter?


Absolutely. Why don't we just pack up all our shit and tell the rest of the world that we're tired of being the world police and they can do whatever they want as long as it doesn't hurt us?
Congrats. You're now an anti-semite ;)

I'm anti everyone except me and mine. Fuck everyone else. Take care of yourself :D
 
It wasn't always like this. I remember when I was a kid that we never had 24/7 middle east news that basically dominated every single channel or payed robot website (course, there were no websites) with Middle east bullshit. It's a fucking joke. The West is so far advanced, yet all you hear about is the new peace process, or what bum in a dirty nightshirt blew up who or where. I am so sick and tired of all this shit. America is being invaded by Mexico, yet you never hear a fucking thing. If there is such a danger from a terrorist attack, wouldn't you protect the borders from a possible dirty nuke? = Fucking Liars.

Why no security before getting on a train? Doesn't a train have more people on it than an airliner? = Fucking Liars. Think Sheople, Think. I know it's hard while watching internet porn all day long.

Radiation is dropping on us all, yet not a word about it. We can't have GE, who owns MSNBC and built most of the reactors of the World, including Japans, Lose a buck eh? Same with BP. Those assholes got a tax break while they bent over every single life force in the area. BP got off scott free. Hell, They even fucked over bacteria.

Hey there, Let's give a round of applause for the Madman Obama and his biggest campaign contributors over at Goldman Sachs! Timothy Geithner's pals. What a joke. = Fucking Liars.

Where is Earth First and Green Peace? LMAO! I guess they are giving their hero Obama a blow job?

LMAO = Fucking Liars too. All of them. Gutless turds. Think sheople, think. If not for you, then atleast for your children. ~BH
 
I'm anti everyone except me and mine. Fuck everyone else. Take care of yourself :D
So if China invades, the military has no obligation to help you?


If China invades my house the rest of you are already fucked. BUT that isn't what I said anyway. Of course a government should protect her own citizens.
So you are a collectivist?

Why should I be forced to hire a man with a gun to save you if you can't take care of yourself?
 
Has Obama ever spoken a truth?


worst PResident ever


He personally destroyed the american dream
 
We are sending israel Billions and to the Palestinians, Millions. We are very involved and always will be.
 
Has Obama ever spoken a truth?


worst PResident ever


He personally destroyed the american dream

You know... you are entitled to your own opinions... No problem.... but you aren't entitled to your own facts.



wow what a DNC talking point



Facts:


Promised unemployment would NOT go above 8% if he could steal 787 billion, call it a "stimulus" and give it to democrat interests.

LIE

End Earmarks

LIE

close Gitmo

LIE

End Lobbyists in Washington

LIE

Bring the troops home

LIE

end Military tribunals


LIE


He is a Christian

LIE


Stand by Israel



LIE








Worst Junior President ever
 
Congrats. You're now an anti-semite ;)

I'm anti everyone except me and mine. Fuck everyone else. Take care of yourself :D
So if China invades, the military has no obligation to help you?

China already owns us bro. They control our politicians, including Obama. You need only look at how our Government, and the media, have completely ignored The Japanese disaster. This is proof that Red China dominates almost every single carpetbagger in D.C and abroad.

When the Earthquake hit Haiti, One would have been led by the media to believe that the entire fucking World stopped turning! Haiti? Are you fucking kidding me? Maybe there is more to rebuild for the internationalist contractors in a turd world Country? I dunno. Either fucking way, we should be helping our Japanese brothers because they are our allies. You stupid sheople better believe that if we don't have Japan as our ally against Red China and Russia, we are done for.

Obama is a fucking piece of garbage. Yet, all of them are. Fact is, Obama is a puppet. These puppet masters don't give a fuck about you or your childrens future. Not even one single commercial asking for aid for Japan? Does anyone out there think that is very odd? Maybe one of the Obamabot computer programs can atleast dream up some load of bullshit that some uneducated community organizer in the windy city would swallow? Anything would be welcomed at this point. What a shame that we are turning our backs on the most important ally that we have. Nope, Sorry Israel, Japan comes first. Not that you don't matter, it's just that Japan will play a key role in regards to America's survival or not. Wake up sheople. Wake up. ~BH
 
Opinion piece
The oipnion of Israelis, not Obama haters.

Haaretz.Com


  • Published 21:25 19.05.11
  • Latest update 21:25 19.05.11
Obama granted Netanyahu a major diplomatic victory

After Obama accepted Netanyahu's demands, the PM now cannot be apathetic to the U.S. president's proposal for 1967 borders.

By Aluf Benn

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu can feel satisfied while flying to Washington Thursday night. U.S. President Barack Obama has granted Netanyahu a major diplomatic victory.

In return for his call for the establishment of a Palestinian state based on 1967 borders with agreed land swaps, without defining the size of these lands, Obama accepted Netanyahu's demands for strict security arrangements and a gradual, continuous withdrawal from the West Bank.
He suggested beginning negotiations on borders and security arrangements, and delaying discussions on the core issues such as Jerusalem and refugees.

More importantly, Obama scornfully rejected the Palestinian initiative to attain recognition at the United Nations and to isolate Israel, demanded the Palestinians return to negotiations, and called on Hamas to recognize Israel's right to exist. These points came straight out of the policy pages of the Prime Minister's Bureau in Jerusalem. Netanyahu could not have asked for more: Obama outright rejects Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas' recognition campaign, as well as the Palestinian reconciliation agreement.

It seems that the new Fatah-Hamas unity has saved Netanyahu from a much more aggressive and binding speech on the part of Obama.
Obama could have also delivered his Mideast speech during the impending AIPAC conference, which he will attend this coming Sunday.

His approach to Israel was empathetic, not only with his reassurance of the U.S. commitment to Israel's security but also with his attempt "to save Israel from itself." Obama warned us that if we perpetuated the occupation, we shall crash due to our demographic inferiority, new military technology, and most importantly, due to the anger of the masses who are slowly gaining power in the surrounding countries. In order to retain the vision of a Jewish and democratic state, Israel must end the occupation and withdraw from the West Bank.

The points of the speech were surely pleasing to Netanyahu's ears. Obama promised he won't force a deal on Israel and the Palestinians and demanded both sides to return to negotiations. He did not condemn, as he did before, the Israeli settlements in the territories as "illegitimate" and did not demand a settlement freeze. He only reminded, in a critical tone, that Israel continues building settlements, as an explanation for the deadlock in peace talks.

Netanyahu will have to reply to Obama by accepting the principle of "1967 borders with agreed land swaps." He made a step toward that direction in his speech in the Knesset this week, when he talked about preserving settlement blocs, which is the same thing in Israeli wording. On the eve of his U.S. trip, Netanyahu's advisers hinted that he will accept this principle on Friday during his close-room meeting with Obama, while presenting a less binding policy during his U.S. Congress speech on Tuesday in fear of causing the breakup of the coalition.

Netanyahu essentially has no choice: after Obama accepted his procedural and security demands, he cannot remain apathetic to the U.S. president's suggestion regarding borders. But Netanyahu has nothing to worry about – there is no chance the Palestinian leadership will agree to return to negotiations under these principles.


After Obama accepted Netanyahu's demands, the PM now cannot be apathetic to the U.S. president's proposal for 1967 borders
So Jim just lied obama did make the suggestion for Israel to go back to the 1967 borders?
 
Our Junior President sure looked like an adolesent college stoner when Netan schooled his Naive ass.


The world laughs at Obama



Only the useless stoners at the U worship this fool.
 

Forum List

Back
Top