Obama: disappointment around the world

Too bad Papa Obama is not running against Bush

Indeed, the Left and the MSM are going to have a harder time
selling this "bag of goods" now that Papa Obama has to run
on his own dismal record

Well at least he has experience this time
Unfortunately , it is all bad

What? So the SCOTUS can appoint him President again?

No thanks.

You mean the first election
Oh yes
the Left always has a hard time when the Constitution is followed
Funny how that works
:eusa_whistle:

When was the Constitution followed with that?

Of course you guys think that in a state where the Candidate brother is governor, the secretary of state is the Candidate's election chair..and certifies the vote and that two Judges, both apointed by the father of the Candidate's administrations with finacial and personal ties to the Candidate and his running mate, sit in Judgement of the case..is somehow, "Constitutional".

And the best part about the whole thing..is that Scalia essentially pointed out that the decision should not be used in other cases..because it was an "emergency".

That one..takes the cake. :eusa_shifty:
 
obama was certainly popular on April 23, 2010 from the date of the article. What a diffrerence 17 months make. Barack Obama's popularity plummets ahead of key speech | World news | guardian.co.uk. That's in Europe! In the arab world, obama's popularity is lower that Bush's ever was. Obama Has this improved any in the last ten months? That's doubtful.

Rather than what the citizens of foreign countries expect from obama, which is more foreign aid and support for their own failing socialist structures, the leaders of foreign countries treat obama with the contempt he deserves. obama is irrelevant and he take the nation with him into irrelevancy. Every foreign policy decision obama has made has been wrong. He has done more to advance the prospects of Al Quaeda more than any terrorists leader since Osama Bin Laden himself to the misery of ordinary muslims and the Christians being slaughtered. Despite offering to double cross America, obama has not even been able to get Putin to come to tea. China has been able to piss in obama's eye over Chen. obama's policy on dealing with North Korea is to go around hoping they continue to fail.

If obama was expected to make the United States a laughing stock around the world, he can be proud that he has done so.
 
obama was certainly popular on April 23, 2010 from the date of the article. What a diffrerence 17 months make. Barack Obama's popularity plummets ahead of key speech | World news | guardian.co.uk. That's in Europe! In the arab world, obama's popularity is lower that Bush's ever was. Obama Has this improved any in the last ten months? That's doubtful.

Rather than what the citizens of foreign countries expect from obama, which is more foreign aid and support for their own failing socialist structures, the leaders of foreign countries treat obama with the contempt he deserves. obama is irrelevant and he take the nation with him into irrelevancy. Every foreign policy decision obama has made has been wrong. He has done more to advance the prospects of Al Quaeda more than any terrorists leader since Osama Bin Laden himself to the misery of ordinary muslims and the Christians being slaughtered. Despite offering to double cross America, obama has not even been able to get Putin to come to tea. China has been able to piss in obama's eye over Chen. obama's policy on dealing with North Korea is to go around hoping they continue to fail.

If obama was expected to make the United States a laughing stock around the world, he can be proud that he has done so.

Of course you guys think killing terrorists like Bin Laden and Gaddafi are wrong.

Hurts the boogeyman meme.
 
What? So the SCOTUS can appoint him President again?

No thanks.

You mean the first election
Oh yes
the Left always has a hard time when the Constitution is followed
Funny how that works
:eusa_whistle:

When was the Constitution followed with that?

Of course you guys think that in a state where the Candidate brother is governor, the secretary of state is the Candidate's election chair..and certifies the vote and that two Judges, both apointed by the father of the Candidate's administrations with finacial and personal ties to the Candidate and his running mate, sit in Judgement of the case..is somehow, "Constitutional".

And the best part about the whole thing..is that Scalia essentially pointed out that the decision should not be used in other cases..because it was an "emergency".

That one..takes the cake. :eusa_shifty:

Everything about that election was done by the Constitution
The Progressive Left can't stand it when the Constitution
holds it back

Which is why they are always trying to circumvent it
 
You mean the first election
Oh yes
the Left always has a hard time when the Constitution is followed
Funny how that works
:eusa_whistle:

When was the Constitution followed with that?

Of course you guys think that in a state where the Candidate brother is governor, the secretary of state is the Candidate's election chair..and certifies the vote and that two Judges, both apointed by the father of the Candidate's administrations with finacial and personal ties to the Candidate and his running mate, sit in Judgement of the case..is somehow, "Constitutional".

And the best part about the whole thing..is that Scalia essentially pointed out that the decision should not be used in other cases..because it was an "emergency".

That one..takes the cake. :eusa_shifty:

Everything about that election was done by the Constitution
The Progressive Left can't stand it when the Constitution
holds it back

Which is why they are always trying to circumvent it

And it was the Supreme Court that made corporations people.

Mitt Romney danced a jig when Corporations were made people. Because those are "Mitt's kind of people". Mitt wants to cut food stamps for the poor, Medicaid, education and healthcare for children. But does he have plans for those needy corporations. You Betcha! Too bad those plans don't include the Republican base. He wins and you get so royally screwed.

And it's all done by the constitution. Perfectly legal.
 
Well if you want to take Union money out of elections
and corporation money, we may be able to go with that one

Exactly

the Left hates the Constitution
 
Last edited:
You mean the first election
Oh yes
the Left always has a hard time when the Constitution is followed
Funny how that works
:eusa_whistle:

When was the Constitution followed with that?

Of course you guys think that in a state where the Candidate brother is governor, the secretary of state is the Candidate's election chair..and certifies the vote and that two Judges, both apointed by the father of the Candidate's administrations with finacial and personal ties to the Candidate and his running mate, sit in Judgement of the case..is somehow, "Constitutional".

And the best part about the whole thing..is that Scalia essentially pointed out that the decision should not be used in other cases..because it was an "emergency".

That one..takes the cake. :eusa_shifty:

Everything about that election was done by the Constitution
The Progressive Left can't stand it when the Constitution
holds it back

Which is why they are always trying to circumvent it

Well you addressed nothing in the post..but what the heck..I will pose a question..

What part of the Constitution allows a state to purge votes, simply because they have a name that resembles one of a convicted felon?

Heck..lets go further..

What part of the Constitution allows a state to take away the right to vote..from anyone?
 
Well if you want to take Union money out of elections
and corporation money, we may be able to go with that one

Exactly

the Left hates the Constitution

It's not the Left that hates the Constitution..it's the right.

Which war after WWII was done by the book..and followed the Constitution?
 
obama was certainly popular on April 23, 2010 from the date of the article. What a diffrerence 17 months make. Barack Obama's popularity plummets ahead of key speech | World news | guardian.co.uk. That's in Europe! In the arab world, obama's popularity is lower that Bush's ever was. Obama Has this improved any in the last ten months? That's doubtful.

Rather than what the citizens of foreign countries expect from obama, which is more foreign aid and support for their own failing socialist structures, the leaders of foreign countries treat obama with the contempt he deserves. obama is irrelevant and he take the nation with him into irrelevancy. Every foreign policy decision obama has made has been wrong. He has done more to advance the prospects of Al Quaeda more than any terrorists leader since Osama Bin Laden himself to the misery of ordinary muslims and the Christians being slaughtered. Despite offering to double cross America, obama has not even been able to get Putin to come to tea. China has been able to piss in obama's eye over Chen. obama's policy on dealing with North Korea is to go around hoping they continue to fail.

If obama was expected to make the United States a laughing stock around the world, he can be proud that he has done so.

Of course you guys think killing terrorists like Bin Laden and Gaddafi are wrong.

Hurts the boogeyman meme.

One of obama's problems is that he claimed to have killed Bin Laden too often and too loudly while everyone knew it wasn't true. Another one of his problems is that he didn't kill Gaddaffi either. Gaddaffi was killed during a British/French operation by Muslim Brotherhood fighters allowing Libya to become a terrorist stronghold. Just like Egypt.
 
There are 2 reasons..count em..2..to declare war that is prescribed by the constitution.

To defend against invasion..and to quell insurrection.

That's it.
 
obama was certainly popular on April 23, 2010 from the date of the article. What a diffrerence 17 months make. Barack Obama's popularity plummets ahead of key speech | World news | guardian.co.uk. That's in Europe! In the arab world, obama's popularity is lower that Bush's ever was. Obama Has this improved any in the last ten months? That's doubtful.

Rather than what the citizens of foreign countries expect from obama, which is more foreign aid and support for their own failing socialist structures, the leaders of foreign countries treat obama with the contempt he deserves. obama is irrelevant and he take the nation with him into irrelevancy. Every foreign policy decision obama has made has been wrong. He has done more to advance the prospects of Al Quaeda more than any terrorists leader since Osama Bin Laden himself to the misery of ordinary muslims and the Christians being slaughtered. Despite offering to double cross America, obama has not even been able to get Putin to come to tea. China has been able to piss in obama's eye over Chen. obama's policy on dealing with North Korea is to go around hoping they continue to fail.

If obama was expected to make the United States a laughing stock around the world, he can be proud that he has done so.

Of course you guys think killing terrorists like Bin Laden and Gaddafi are wrong.

Hurts the boogeyman meme.

One of obama's problems is that he claimed to have killed Bin Laden too often and too loudly while everyone knew it wasn't true. Another one of his problems is that he didn't kill Gaddaffi either. Gaddaffi was killed during a British/French operation by Muslim Brotherhood fighters allowing Libya to become a terrorist stronghold. Just like Egypt.

Ah..so if a person hires a hit man to kill someone..they are innocent..right? Since they didn't pull the trigger.

And the US was involved in Libya..

You guys had a baby about it for the longest time.
 
There are 2 reasons..count em..2..to declare war that is prescribed by the constitution.

To defend against invasion..and to quell insurrection.

That's it.

Then Thomas Jefferson was entirely wrong when he declared war (and defeated) the Barbary Pirates as they posed no threat of invasion.
 
There are 2 reasons..count em..2..to declare war that is prescribed by the constitution.

To defend against invasion..and to quell insurrection.

That's it.

Then Thomas Jefferson was entirely wrong when he declared war (and defeated) the Barbary Pirates as they posed no threat of invasion.

Fighting Piracy is covered in the Constitution.

To define and punish Piracies and Felonies committed on the high Seas, and Offenses against the Law of Nations;
 
When was the Constitution followed with that?

Of course you guys think that in a state where the Candidate brother is governor, the secretary of state is the Candidate's election chair..and certifies the vote and that two Judges, both apointed by the father of the Candidate's administrations with finacial and personal ties to the Candidate and his running mate, sit in Judgement of the case..is somehow, "Constitutional".

And the best part about the whole thing..is that Scalia essentially pointed out that the decision should not be used in other cases..because it was an "emergency".

That one..takes the cake. :eusa_shifty:

Everything about that election was done by the Constitution
The Progressive Left can't stand it when the Constitution
holds it back

Which is why they are always trying to circumvent it

Well you addressed nothing in the post..but what the heck..I will pose a question..

What part of the Constitution allows a state to purge votes, simply because they have a name that resembles one of a convicted felon?

Heck..lets go further..

What part of the Constitution allows a state to take away the right to vote..from anyone?


Convicted Felon or Prisoners?

Hmm, who would they vote for?
---------------------------------------------------------------

Well again the Constitutional process
Of course, one is allowed to keep trying

Richardson v. Ramirez (1974)
the United States Supreme Court upheld the constitutionality of felon disenfranchisement
Section 2 of the 14th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution

Oct 2010
The US Supreme Court declined to hear the case of three inmates against Massachusetts
for that issue
-----------------------------------------------------

No doubt the Left will keep trying
Come this election they will need every vote they
can get
 
Damn, can't these wingnuts read? I think they're just suckered into any story with a catchy title that hints of criticism toward Obama - like Pavlov's dog.


Since I'm not a Republican, and in no way a Bush supporter, and I posted the article, what's your point? I agree with the article. So maybe you ought to think a little, before you open your yap.
 

Forum List

Back
Top