Obama directly responsible for Oregon shooting

[bedowin62]

no leftard i said Democrats had larger majorities, MUCH LARGER than Republican majorities. you're citing ONE YEAR where there was ONE MORE republican while i cited ALL THE OTHER YEARS WHEN DEMOCRAT MAJORITIES DWARFED what Bush had

you are a clown

288 Replicans is "1 more" than 284 Democrats/Independents?

You really do suck at math.

And that "one year" I referenced was all I needed to prove you wrong since you claimed Democrats had a bigger majority in 2007 than Republicans had prior to that under Bush.

AND THIS IS WHERE YOU REVEAL WHAT A LOSER YOU ARE. is it four votes idiot??

now what was the Democrat majority in other years? particularly in the 111th congress dullard?

my point what democrat majorities were larger; and they were. you are making a fool of yourself

It's... you suck at math.... is what it is. That's why you make an idiot of yourself claiming there were more Democrats in 2007 than there were Republicans in 2005.

you're embarrasing yourself

really just stop. how sad.
your argument is you're more correct based on one year with a whole four votes??


really?/

were Democrat majorities bigger than Republican majorities/


what a loser

My argument is you're a rightard you can't admit it, as evidenced by your idiotic claim being proven wrong repeatedly.

Poor, bedwetter.

normal people are laughing at you

 

[bedowin62]

you've been posting for 3 years longer than i have. i might pass your rating today or tomorrow.

ur a joke

 

[Faun]

288 Replicans is "1 more" than 284 Democrats/Independents?

You really do suck at math.

And that "one year" I referenced was all I needed to prove you wrong since you claimed Democrats had a bigger majority in 2007 than Republicans had prior to that under Bush.

AND THIS IS WHERE YOU REVEAL WHAT A LOSER YOU ARE. is it four votes idiot??

now what was the Democrat majority in other years? particularly in the 111th congress dullard?

my point what democrat majorities were larger; and they were. you are making a fool of yourself

It's... you suck at math.... is what it is. That's why you make an idiot of yourself claiming there were more Democrats in 2007 than there were Republicans in 2005.

you're embarrasing yourself

really just stop. how sad.
your argument is you're more correct based on one year with a whole four votes??


really?/

were Democrat majorities bigger than Republican majorities/


what a loser

My argument is you're a rightard you can't admit it, as evidenced by your idiotic claim being proven wrong repeatedly.

Poor, bedwetter.

normal people are laughing at you

Fortunately for me, you're conservative, not normal.

 

[bedowin62]

AND THIS IS WHERE YOU REVEAL WHAT A LOSER YOU ARE. is it four votes idiot??

now what was the Democrat majority in other years? particularly in the 111th congress dullard?

my point what democrat majorities were larger; and they were. you are making a fool of yourself

It's... you suck at math.... is what it is. That's why you make an idiot of yourself claiming there were more Democrats in 2007 than there were Republicans in 2005.

you're embarrasing yourself

really just stop. how sad.
your argument is you're more correct based on one year with a whole four votes??


really?/

were Democrat majorities bigger than Republican majorities/


what a loser

My argument is you're a rightard you can't admit it, as evidenced by your idiotic claim being proven wrong repeatedly.

Poor, bedwetter.

normal people are laughing at you

Ifortunstely for me, you're conservative, not normal.

reduced to just babbling

how sad

 

[Faun]

you've been posting for 3 years longer than i have. i might pass your rating today or tomorrow.

ur a joke

So? You've also posted about 4,000 more posts than I have in three years less than me. I guess you have more time on your hands to post here than I have.

But as a percentage of posts...

Faun: 38%
Bedwetter: 28%

You better try harder, bedwetter, you're far below my paygrade.

 

[bedowin62]

you've been posting for 3 years longer than i have. i might pass your rating today or tomorrow.

ur a joke

So? You've also posted about 4,000 more posts than I have in three years less than me. I guess you have more time on your hands to post here than I have.

But as a percentage of posts...

Faun: 38%
Bedwetter: 28%

You better try harder, bedwetter, you're far below my paygrade.

or more substance

you see leftard people like you with no sense of shame take more posts to put in their place

 

[Faun]

you've been posting for 3 years longer than i have. i might pass your rating today or tomorrow.

ur a joke

So? You've also posted about 4,000 more posts than I have in three years less than me. I guess you have more time on your hands to post here than I have.

But as a percentage of posts...

Faun: 38%
Bedwetter: 28%

You better try harder, bedwetter, you're far below my paygrade.

or more substance

you see leftard people like you with no sense of shame take more posts to put in their place

Poor, bedwetter.

Faun: 38%
Bedwetter: 28:

 

[bedowin62]

you've been posting for 3 years longer than i have. i might pass your rating today or tomorrow.

ur a joke

So? You've also posted about 4,000 more posts than I have in three years less than me. I guess you have more time on your hands to post here than I have.

But as a percentage of posts...

Faun: 38%
Bedwetter: 28%

You better try harder, bedwetter, you're far below my paygrade.

or more substance

you see leftard people like you with no sense of shame take more posts to put in their place

Poor, bedwetter.

Faun: 38%
Bedwetter: 28:

YAWN

somebody should tell this leftard how to think critically. all that shows is stubborn left-wing losers need more convincing

 

[Faun]

YAWN

Keep exercising your jaw, bedwetter, it's all you're good at.

 

[bedowin62]

you've been posting for 3 years longer than i have. i might pass your rating today or tomorrow.

ur a joke

So? You've also posted about 4,000 more posts than I have in three years less than me. I guess you have more time on your hands to post here than I have.

But as a percentage of posts...

Faun: 38%
Bedwetter: 28%

You better try harder, bedwetter, you're far below my paygrade.

or more substance

you see leftard people like you with no sense of shame take more posts to put in their place

Poor, bedwetter.

Faun: 38%
Bedwetter: 28:

YAWN

somebody should tell this leftard how to think critically. all that shows is stubborn left-wing losers need more convincing

Keep exercising your jaw, bedwetter, it's all you're good at.

i'm actually typing; idiot

 

[jon_berzerk]

288 Replicans is "1 more" than 284 Democrats/Independents?

You really do suck at math.

And that "one year" I referenced was all I needed to prove you wrong since you claimed Democrats had a bigger majority in 2007 than Republicans had prior to that under Bush.

AND THIS IS WHERE YOU REVEAL WHAT A LOSER YOU ARE. is it four votes idiot??

now what was the Democrat majority in other years? particularly in the 111th congress dullard?

my point what democrat majorities were larger; and they were. you are making a fool of yourself

It's... you suck at math.... is what it is. That's why you make an idiot of yourself claiming there were more Democrats in 2007 than there were Republicans in 2005.

you're embarrasing yourself

really just stop. how sad.
your argument is you're more correct based on one year with a whole four votes??


really?/

were Democrat majorities bigger than Republican majorities/


what a loser

My argument is you're a rightard you can't admit it, as evidenced by your idiotic claim being proven wrong repeatedly.

Poor, bedwetter.

normal people are laughing at you

yes they are --LOL