Obama creates 297,000 JOBS!

[Inception]

well since job losses peaked in Jan 09, right after Obama took control, he has been instrumental in reversing the trend of job losses under Bush. Although this chart only goes until March of 2010, it still shows the Obama trend.

Your chart doesn't prove that either Bush or Obama are responsible for the job losses or gains that took place.

Take it up with your wingnut buddies who posted a similar chart (but one that cut out the info that Obama created jobs) and tried to argue that it showed that Obama was destroying jobs.

Wingnuts think that the govt is not responsible for creating jobs.....except when it is.

i think that translation is only slightly off. wingnuts think that when jobs are created its because of conservatives / GOP, but when the economy loses jobs its the Dems and Obama's fault.

 

[Sallow]

A full time job without a specified end date, as opposed to a temp job which is for a limited term.

So you post this now..after posting I was wrong about posting the very same thing.

Gosh..

Which is it?

Because according two your previous post..we are both wrong.

That's not what I said you were wrong about. You claimed that corporate entities who were awash in cash were now hiring. Most of the new hires are in firms with less than 499 people - which are not Awash In Cash. The jobs are largely service related - which is generally a low pay category.

No actually..you don't know what you are talking about. My company just fired a crap load of people this last quarter. Lo and behold they hired the same amount of consultants as employees they just fired. And it's not just my company either. I work for an extremely wealthy company.

 

[code1211]

So if Obama can't claim victory on creating job? Who gets the credit? The democratic congress? That's still a win for Obama. With the Repubs being the party of no and the tax compromise not in affect, the only thing that could hav caused this was democratic policy........

they are the party of no.

Say no to socialism.

Would you be up for cutting all the Socialism in the Constitution?

Examples?

 

[sangha]

they are the party of no.

Say no to socialism.

Would you be up for cutting all the Socialism in the Constitution?

Examples?

The General Welfare clause
The Interstate Commerce clause

Those two clauses can justify just about every socialistic program that's ever been implemented

 

[Sallow]

they are the party of no.

Say no to socialism.

Would you be up for cutting all the Socialism in the Constitution?

Examples?

The Military and the Post office.

There's more but none so apparent.

 

[Inception]

Would you be up for cutting all the Socialism in the Constitution?

Examples?

The General Welfare clause
The Interstate Commerce clause

Those two clauses can justify just about every socialistic program that's ever been implemented

so this line of logic we will be cutting the following:

Social Security
Medicare
Medicaid
Welfare
Food Stamps
Foster Homes
Government Pensions
Government Health Care Benefits
Unemployment Insurance
Disability Income
Pell Grants
Low Income Housing Assistance
Veterans Medical Care
Head Start
Foster Care
School Lunch Programs

and so on and so on.....
ok lets do it, everyone gets to fend for themselves. no help or assistance with anything in life. this was we will all be happy, satisfied and free.

while were at it, lets just remove any and all regulations. no more pollution controls, banking regulations, FDIC protection, lets let credit card companies charge any rate they wish and make payment terms 10 days, we can remove all oil drilling restrictions and them drill anywhere in the US without permits or regulations. we can get rid of OSHA, the FDA and the FCC. no more energy monopolies. this will be a perfect Utopian society.

(just never mind the millions of people who have been instantly been put into poverty, or out on the street, buts it ok, be no one deserves any kind of handouts anymore)

 

[sangha]

The national highway system
The Internet
airports
The National Weather Service

 

[Sallow]

Examples?

The General Welfare clause
The Interstate Commerce clause

Those two clauses can justify just about every socialistic program that's ever been implemented

so this line of logic we will be cutting the following:

Social Security
Medicare
Medicaid
Welfare
Food Stamps
Foster Homes
Government Pensions
Government Health Care Benefits
Unemployment Insurance
Disability Income
Pell Grants
Low Income Housing Assistance
Veterans Medical Care
Head Start
Foster Care
School Lunch Programs

and so on and so on.....
ok lets do it, everyone gets to fend for themselves. no help or assistance with anything in life. this was we will all be happy, satisfied and free.

while were at it, lets just remove any and all regulations. no more pollution controls, banking regulations, FDIC protection, lets let credit card companies charge any rate they wish and make payment terms 10 days, we can remove all oil drilling restrictions and them drill anywhere in the US without permits or regulations. we can get rid of OSHA, the FDA and the FCC. no more energy monopolies. this will be a perfect Utopian society.

(just never mind the millions of people who have been instantly been put into poverty, or out on the street, buts it ok, be no one deserves any kind of handouts anymore)

Which is the conservative wet dream.

 

[Inception]

i think the conservatives just like to watch people suffer

 

[sangha]

i think the conservatives just like to watch people suffer

It makes them feel better to see someone suffering more than they are. Misery loves company, and nothing is more miserable than a wingnut

That's why they are always expressing their Perpetual Poutrage. Nothing is too small to get Poutraged about.

They get called wingnut.....Poutrage!!
They get called teabaggers....Poutrage!!
Someone says Happy Holidays....Poutrage
The President bows.....Poutrage

 

[Stephanie]

Holy smokes, now they have Conservatives like to watch people suffer.

 

[uscitizen]

So you post this now..after posting I was wrong about posting the very same thing.

Gosh..

Which is it?

Because according two your previous post..we are both wrong.

That's not what I said you were wrong about. You claimed that corporate entities who were awash in cash were now hiring. Most of the new hires are in firms with less than 499 people - which are not Awash In Cash. The jobs are largely service related - which is generally a low pay category.

No actually..you don't know what you are talking about. My company just fired a crap load of people this last quarter. Lo and behold they hired the same amount of consultants as employees they just fired. And it's not just my company either. I work for an extremely wealthy company.

Yep a major telecom company has been doing that for 25 years.
No benefits for consultants = more profit.

 

[SFC Ollie]

Holy smokes, now they have Conservatives like to watch people suffer.

They can't help it.

 

[Dont Taz Me Bro]

Take it up with your wingnut buddies who posted a similar chart (but one that cut out the info that Obama created jobs) and tried to argue that it showed that Obama was destroying jobs.

Wingnuts think that the govt is not responsible for creating jobs.....except when it is.

So prove that these 297,000 jobs were created by the government. Should be pretty easy for you since you're so certain.