Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
No words could describe it, so i simplified it for you ........
It is hard to take over titanic AFTER it hit the iceberg.
Blame the Bush administration, original ........
Sorry, but the stimulus failed to avoid the double digit unemployment iceberg .......
Based on what you are saying, I guess the democrats dont mind being called Jackasses.....
Am I correct?
They don't seem to complain when you call them that all the time anyway.
Well, I'm confusing "they don't complain" with "they don't give a shit what you think"....
Suck it up and drive on.
It is hard to take over titanic AFTER it hit the iceberg.
Blame the Bush administration, original ........
Sorry, but the stimulus failed to avoid the double digit unemployment iceberg .......
You said it. The legacy was THAT sever.
Blame the Bush administration, original ........
Sorry, but the stimulus failed to avoid the double digit unemployment iceberg .......
You said it. The legacy was THAT sever.
The previous chimp in charge was a fuck up, the current one hasn't done anything but make a bigger mess. No matter how much you and Keith Olbermann don't think so................
Clever.
No words could describe it, so i simplified it for you ........
It is hard to take over titanic AFTER it hit the iceberg.
You said it. The legacy was THAT sever.
The previous chimp in charge was a fuck up, the current one hasn't done anything but make a bigger mess. No matter how much you and Keith Olbermann don't think so................
Unemployment going down, economy growing. Compared to blooming economy at the start and total catastrophe at the end. Cons better set their standards low.
No words could describe it, so i simplified it for you ........
It is hard to take over titanic AFTER it hit the iceberg.
I wonder how many more would have died if soemone DID take over the Titanic after it hit the iceberg...and steered it into a larger iceberg.
You said it. The legacy was THAT sever.
The previous chimp in charge was a fuck up, the current one hasn't done anything but make a bigger mess. No matter how much you and Keith Olbermann don't think so................
Unemployment going down, economy growing. Compared to blooming economy at the start and total catastrophe at the end. Cons better set their standards low.
The previous chimp in charge was a fuck up, the current one hasn't done anything but make a bigger mess. No matter how much you and Keith Olbermann don't think so................
Unemployment going down, economy growing. Compared to blooming economy at the start and total catastrophe at the end. Cons better set their standards low.
I suggest you do a little research and find out what it means when the unemployment rate goes down but there is still a positive number of new unemployment claims.
It is only good news to those that try to spin it into good news.
I saw it as very bad news.....as that is what it is.
The previous chimp in charge was a fuck up, the current one hasn't done anything but make a bigger mess. No matter how much you and Keith Olbermann don't think so................
Unemployment going down, economy growing. Compared to blooming economy at the start and total catastrophe at the end. Cons better set their standards low.
wow ......
Unemployment going down, economy growing. Compared to blooming economy at the start and total catastrophe at the end. Cons better set their standards low.
wow ......
It sucks I know. You can still hope he fails.
Unemployment going down, economy growing. Compared to blooming economy at the start and total catastrophe at the end. Cons better set their standards low.
I suggest you do a little research and find out what it means when the unemployment rate goes down but there is still a positive number of new unemployment claims.
It is only good news to those that try to spin it into good news.
I saw it as very bad news.....as that is what it is.
500,000 a month vs 20,000 jobs a month lost. Real good statistic. And I am taking CONSERVATIVE numbers, not actual unemployment.
wow ......
It sucks I know. You can still hope he fails.
He has, so have you ........
I suggest you do a little research and find out what it means when the unemployment rate goes down but there is still a positive number of new unemployment claims.
It is only good news to those that try to spin it into good news.
I saw it as very bad news.....as that is what it is.
500,000 a month vs 20,000 jobs a month lost. Real good statistic. And I am taking CONSERVATIVE numbers, not actual unemployment.
You really dont understand how the economy works...do you.
JokeStarkey said:Good job, Sinatra. Now let's nuance and put it in context with other presidents of the last forty years at the same time in their presidency. Then we will know the significance of the data.
Why? Unless the circumstances were exactly the same at those points in time, what is the statistical significance of comparing time periods?
RCP, which used to be touted by you 0bama defenders as the true indication of Barry's approval rating, isn't getting as much play as it did before and it's obvious as to why...
I knew but did not realize how deficient your critical thinking skills were, House. What a stupid statement.
500,000 a month vs 20,000 jobs a month lost. Real good statistic. And I am taking CONSERVATIVE numbers, not actual unemployment.
You really dont understand how the economy works...do you.
Obviouslt not, when job losses drop from half a million to 20,000 it is awful.
You really dont understand how the economy works...do you.
Obviouslt not, when job losses drop from half a million to 20,000 it is awful.
I see you are easily fooled by numbers.
You need to understand how the economy works to understand the numbers and what they mean.
My suggestion is you start off by getting a job.
From there, you will start to learn how things work in a free economy
You really dont understand how the economy works...do you.
Obviouslt not, when job losses drop from half a million to 20,000 it is awful.
I see you are easily fooled by numbers.
You need to understand how the economy works to understand the numbers and what they mean.
My suggestion is you start off by getting a job.
From there, you will start to learn how things work in a free economy
Look, I know it doesn't apply to brain dead like you, but what would you prefer losing 500,000 brain cells or 20, 000 brain cells? Ah, who am I kidding, since when pubs have any brain cells?Obviouslt not, when job losses drop from half a million to 20,000 it is awful.
I see you are easily fooled by numbers.
You need to understand how the economy works to understand the numbers and what they mean.
My suggestion is you start off by getting a job.
From there, you will start to learn how things work in a free economy
He's obviously a "Kos Kid"....
I wouldn't expect too much from him in logical thinking...
Fuck, he already thinks losing 20,000 jobs is a GOOD thing....lol
