Obama assassinated Fox News Twitter hacked

HOw is some wacko posting a bogus Tweet on Fox's hacked account newsworthy? ANd how is FOX responsible for the content?

A lot of hot air in this thread about nothing.
Seems twitter is getting everyone into hot water these days, remember the WEINER, or is it WIENER?
Murdoch in trouble again, ha ha.:tongue:
 
HOw is some wacko posting a bogus Tweet on Fox's hacked account newsworthy? ANd how is FOX responsible for the content?

A lot of hot air in this thread about nothing.
Seems twitter is getting everyone into hot water these days, remember the WEINER, or is it WIENER?
Murdoch in trouble again, ha ha.:tongue:

Just pointing out the fucking obvious to the terminally stupid.... the Murdoch trouble... ain't got jack shit to do with twitter.

idiot.
 
Another drunken sot...
:eusa_eh:
Man's call for Obama assassination is free speech, not crime, court rules
July 19, 2011 | A La Mesa man who posted racial epithets and a call to "shoot" Barack Obama on an Internet chat site was engaging in constitutionally protected free speech, a federal appeals court ruled Tuesday in overturning his criminal conviction.
Walter Bagdasarian was found guilty two years ago of making threats against a major presidential candidate in comments he posted on a Yahoo.com financial website after 1 a.m. on Oct. 22, 2008, as Obama's impending victory in the race for the White House was becoming apparent. Bagdasarian told investigators he was drunk at the time.

A divided panel of the U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals overturned that conviction Tuesday, saying Bagdasarian's comments were "particularly repugnant" because they endorsed violence but that a reasonable person wouldn't have taken them as a genuine threat.

The observation that Obama "will have a 50 cal in the head soon" and a call to "shoot the [racist slur]" weren't violations of the law under which Bagdasarian was convicted because the statute doesn't criminalize "predictions or exhortations to others to injure or kill the president," said the majority opinion written by Judge Stephen Reinhardt.

"When our law punishes words, we must examine the surrounding circumstances to discern the significance of those words’ utterance, but must not distort or embellish their plain meaning so that the law may reach them," said the 2-1 ruling in which Chief Judge Alex Kozinski joined but Judge Kim McLane Wardlaw dissented.

Source
 
Holder's "justice dept" raided an alleged left wing hacker group called "anonymous" recently. The same group that took credit for hacking Sara Palin's E-Mail account two years ago. No word on whether the raid was successful or if it was just another cheap political ploy.
 

Forum List

Back
Top