Obama: ‘Apology’ in Cairo embassy attack was ‘an effort to cool the situation down

youre joking right?

nope.....Selective outrage from people who will whine about what obama does period.

Its not hard to figure out people who are so transparent.

You realize muslims stormed our embassy and murdered four people right? Christians would never do that so your argument makes no sense. If christians were going around blowing up buildings and killing ambassadors people would respond the same way they are toward muslims.
"But that's the Muslim culture! Who are we to judge? Now, conservative Christian culture -- we'll judge the dogshit outta that!!"

Right, Plaz?
 
You realize muslims stormed our embassy and murdered four people right? Christians would never do that so your argument makes no sense. If christians were going around blowing up buildings and killing ambassadors people would respond the same way they are toward muslims.

yeah.....i know what happened skippy.

point remains at selective outrage because a few protested...

lol a few? more than a few, buddy. Oh and it wasnt just protest. It was an assault and a killing of four Americans. Are you not outraged by this? Does the murder of a US ambassador not outrage you?
He really doesn't give a shit.
 
Guess it didnt work

One thing that terrorism and appeasement have in common is that neither has ever won anything of significance in the history of mankind.

Negotiation works when you have moral people on the other side of the table, like Ghandi and the British, or MLK Jr. and the civil right movement. And strength works when you don't have moral people on the other side of the table, like the Cold War and WWII. But appeasement and terrorism have never worked anywhere.
 
Guess it didnt work

Or maybe it did. The Embassy employees in Egypt were not harmed were they?

Imagine you are about to be attacked by an angry mob. They are angry about something that someone else, not you, did. Do you really having a problem with someone sending out a "It's not us" message before being mobbed?

How do you feel about the bible's Lott?

They were not harmed because they left. There was no one to harm. Like the embassy in Libya was evacuated. No one at the Libyan embassy was harmed either. Ambassador Stevens wasn't attacked at the Embassy in Tripoli, but at the consular office in Benghazi where he went to help the consular office evacuate.

They all knew, but obama is saying no one knew.
 
There was no apology.

Romney does not understand free speech. Read The Mohammed movie and the embassy attacks: Romney betrays free speech. - Slate Magazine if you wish not to sound illiterate, as most of the extremist right does on this subject.

The article clearly says otherwise.........

There you go actually reading the links again lol

My bad....:eusa_hand:...................It is just difficult to be as mindless as the left.....
 
The link is very clear that there was no apology to the terrorists and that Romney was wrong.

That's it, guys; the rest of the world gets it, and as you continue to stonewall on this, you hurt Romney's campaign.
The article clearly says otherwise.........

There you go actually reading the links again lol

My bad....:eusa_hand:...................It is just difficult to be as mindless as the left.....
 
The link is very clear that there was no apology to the terrorists and that Romney was wrong.

That's it, guys; the rest of the world gets it, and as you continue to stonewall on this, you hurt Romney's campaign.
There you go actually reading the links again lol

My bad....:eusa_hand:...................It is just difficult to be as mindless as the left.....

Move goal POSTS.................check.............:badgrin:
 
Democrats continue to believe the fiction that groveling to muslims is the successful way to handle them.

They should ask themselves why there was muslim uprisings in London, Paris and Australia but not in the US.
 
You moving the goal posts, Full-Auto, is hurting Romney's chance.

Simply the way it is.
The link is very clear that there was no apology to the terrorists and that Romney was wrong.

That's it, guys; the rest of the world gets it, and as you continue to stonewall on this, you hurt Romney's campaign.
My bad....:eusa_hand:...................It is just difficult to be as mindless as the left.....

Move goal POSTS.................check.............:badgrin:
 
You moving the goal posts, Full-Auto, is hurting Romney's chance.

Simply the way it is.
The link is very clear that there was no apology to the terrorists and that Romney was wrong.

That's it, guys; the rest of the world gets it, and as you continue to stonewall on this, you hurt Romney's campaign.

Move goal POSTS.................check.............:badgrin:

An apology was issued.


You cant run jake.......
 
The diversion WORKED, we have Libya covered, and troops in Yemen. Baby Bush would still be tearfully shouting DEAD OR ALIVE; Cheney with his stockbroker*to see war in which countries could pull in the most $$$$ for him.

*The undisclosed locations were obviously OPEN to financial advisers. Cheney NETTED 5-6 MILLION on a 2 million dollar salary. The Vice Presidency was a pot of gold for him.

You don't seem to mind that both Obama and his wife are getting filthy rich while he is President.

What an interesting assertion...you can back it up with facts, right?
 
Nope, there was no apology to the terrorists for offending them.

You are lying, Full-Auto, and hurting Romney's chances.

This is going to follow you, Full-Auto. You can't hide.

http://www.slate.com/articles/news_...assy_attacks_romney_betrays_free_speech_.html

You moving the goal posts, Full-Auto, is hurting Romney's chance.

Simply the way it is.
Move goal POSTS.................check.............:badgrin:

An apology was issued.


You cant run jake.......
 
I see that no one has been able to post the "apology".

Reason, it doesn't exist. It didn't happen.
 
nope.....Selective outrage from people who will whine about what obama does period.

Its not hard to figure out people who are so transparent.

You realize muslims stormed our embassy and murdered four people right? Christians would never do that so your argument makes no sense. If christians were going around blowing up buildings and killing ambassadors people would respond the same way they are toward muslims.
"But that's the Muslim culture! Who are we to judge? Now, conservative Christian culture -- we'll judge the dogshit outta that!!"

Right, Plaz?

No
 
You realize muslims stormed our embassy and murdered four people right? Christians would never do that so your argument makes no sense. If christians were going around blowing up buildings and killing ambassadors people would respond the same way they are toward muslims.

yeah.....i know what happened skippy.

point remains at selective outrage because a few protested...

lol a few? more than a few, buddy. Oh and it wasnt just protest. It was an assault and a killing of four Americans. Are you not outraged by this? Does the murder of a US ambassador not outrage you?

No,people die for stupid reasons.coolheads are what is needed here.not your "Outrage"
 
Compare and contrast the Embassy statement, aka the infamous 'apology':

The Embassy of the United States in Cairo condemns the continuing efforts by misguided individuals to hurt the religious feelings of Muslims – as we condemn efforts to offend believers of all religions. Today, the 11th anniversary of the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks on the United States, Americans are honoring our patriots and those who serve our nation as the fitting response to the enemies of democracy. Respect for religious beliefs is a cornerstone of American democracy. We firmly reject the actions by those who abuse the universal right of free speech to hurt the religious beliefs of others...


...to Mitt Romney's statement, aka 'apology', three days ago:


And the idea of using something that some people consider sacred and then parading that out a negative way is simply inappropriate and wrong. And I wish people wouldn’t do it. Of course, we have a First Amendment. And under the First Amendment, people are allowed to do what they feel they want to do. They have the right to do that, but it’s not right to do things that are of the nature of what was done by, apparently this film.

Who wants to show us a dime's worth of difference between the two????

Specifics, please.

Doesn't ANYONE who thinks the embassy statement was an apology want to tell us why Mitt Romney's statement, which btw was long AFTER the attack,

was NOT an apology?

ANYONE?
 

Forum List

Back
Top