obama and his incompetent regime

Discussion in 'Politics' started by infman4x, Jan 24, 2013.

  1. infman4x
    Offline

    infman4x Member

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2011
    Messages:
    69
    Thanks Received:
    33
    Trophy Points:
    6
    Ratings:
    +33
    this incompetent outfit is working on everything except what they should be working on. rand paul said it best in the benghazi hearings: he told hillary clinton that if he were president, he would of fired her. she should have been fired for her neglect of office. no troops supported those folks that were killed and there should have been, shameful and she wants to run for president?

    feinstien got upset for rand paul telling what should have happened, too bad. now she is going after guns instead a real solution to the problem. hey feinstein leave our constitution and freedom alone. you and your liberal friends turn in your guns along with resignations so we can save america and our freedom.

    you liberals keep your crooked hands off our guns and the second amendment. have your hollywood buddies turn in theirs. i think hollywood moved to washington, all the acting and nothings getting done. the liberals want to raise revenue, raise the debt ceiling, whats this tell you? more debt no resolve, just blame the republicans! because we do not get our way. gee all the republicans want is fiscal responsibility. you cannot write a twenty dollar check if you only have ten dollars in the bank, unless you are in obamas world.

    stand up america! arent you tired of all the cover up, lies, do as i say not as i do garbage. hey! washington get your priorities straight, quit trying to control the people. the terrorist are on the run! my ass, they are popping up all over. oh it is telling the public what they want to hear mode, they will believe it! they elected obama the second time.

    we the people need to stand up for what is right! there are more of us than there are of them, let your voices be heard. thank you!
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
    Last edited: Jan 24, 2013
  2. Seawytch
    Offline

    Seawytch Information isnt Advocacy

    Joined:
    Aug 5, 2010
    Messages:
    28,998
    Thanks Received:
    3,962
    Trophy Points:
    280
    Location:
    Peaking out from the redwoods
    Ratings:
    +7,043
    e.e. cummings on crack
     
  3. francoHFW
    Offline

    francoHFW Platinum Member

    Joined:
    Sep 5, 2011
    Messages:
    33,472
    Thanks Received:
    2,177
    Trophy Points:
    1,115
    Location:
    NY 26th FINALLY DEM!
    Ratings:
    +5,614
    OP-You lose. Deal with it. No one's taking your guns, moron.
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 2
  4. Charles_Main
    Offline

    Charles_Main AR15 Owner

    Joined:
    Jun 23, 2008
    Messages:
    16,692
    Thanks Received:
    2,238
    Trophy Points:
    88
    Location:
    Michigan, USA
    Ratings:
    +2,251
    You are so blind, The left will never stop until they take them all.
     
  5. Dragonlady
    Offline

    Dragonlady Designing Woman

    Joined:
    Dec 1, 2012
    Messages:
    4,870
    Thanks Received:
    1,030
    Trophy Points:
    255
    Location:
    Niagara Escarpment
    Ratings:
    +2,947
    It is illegal for the US to deploy troops to protect their embassies. That would be considered an act of war.

    Where were you when 7 embassies were attacked and hundreds of people were killed during the Bush administration? Where were your demands that the SoS be fired? Where were you when the Republicans were cutting the budget for embassy security?

    Benghazi is a pointless exercise by conservatives howling at the moon. Rand Paul could not have fired HRC because he couldn't even get out of the primaries, much less get elected.
     
  6. Charles_Main
    Offline

    Charles_Main AR15 Owner

    Joined:
    Jun 23, 2008
    Messages:
    16,692
    Thanks Received:
    2,238
    Trophy Points:
    88
    Location:
    Michigan, USA
    Ratings:
    +2,251
    That is completely untrue bud. Learn International law Regarding Embassies. You are dead wrong.
     
  7. Mr. H.
    Offline

    Mr. H. Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Aug 19, 2009
    Messages:
    44,117
    Thanks Received:
    9,265
    Trophy Points:
    2,030
    Location:
    A warm place with no memory.
    Ratings:
    +15,395
    in a corporate setting, you know, the real world- Obama and flunkies would have been given the boot long ago.

    This administration is one big Dilbert cartoon.
     
  8. Dragonlady
    Offline

    Dragonlady Designing Woman

    Joined:
    Dec 1, 2012
    Messages:
    4,870
    Thanks Received:
    1,030
    Trophy Points:
    255
    Location:
    Niagara Escarpment
    Ratings:
    +2,947
    This was not an embassy, it was a diplomatic outpost. You cannot deploy troops either to an embassy or a diplomatic outpost - that is illegal. They can have Marines within the compound protecting the grounds, but you cannot deploy additional troops to protect your embassies.

    I am not wrong in this regard. Deploying troops to embassies or diplomatic outposts, violates international law. It is the obligation of the host country to defend the embassy outside of the grounds.
     
    Last edited: Jan 25, 2013
  9. auditor0007
    Offline

    auditor0007 Gold Member

    Joined:
    Oct 19, 2008
    Messages:
    12,566
    Thanks Received:
    2,255
    Trophy Points:
    255
    Location:
    Toledo, OH
    Ratings:
    +3,218
    You're wrong and the reason is simple. Very few on the left want to take all of your guns away, because many on the left have guns of their own.
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
  10. Claudette
    Online

    Claudette Gold Member

    Joined:
    Nov 3, 2009
    Messages:
    19,628
    Thanks Received:
    3,024
    Trophy Points:
    280
    Ratings:
    +7,684
    If they had increased security at Benghazi those four men would probably still be alive.

    Kinda funny you say the Reps cut spending. I seem to remember a spokesperson coming out and saying that funding wasn't an issue. There was plenty of money to increase security. It was the State Department who decided no to increase said security. I guess they didn't want to "offend" the Libyans.

    Oh and BTW. If they were expecting Libyans to defend the consulate they were SOL.

    They stood around with fingers up ass while four good men died and no help came.

    And Yes. If it were up to me I would have sent them help regardless of International Law. I'd take my chances and try to save my folks.
     

Share This Page