Obama administration's appeasement to Iranian Islamists

I ran across this and bookmarked it off another site.

snip:
Obama's desire to close down GITMO may be about his nefarious alliances.
Vanity | 12/19/2015 | johnwk

Posted on ‎12‎/‎19‎/‎2015‎ ‎4‎:‎01‎:‎39‎ ‎PM by JOHN W K

Looking past the distraction of releasing terrorists from Guantanamo, there seems to be another reason for Obama wanting to close it down.


The Guantanamo Naval Station is an important asset connected to the defense of the United States and helps America keep an eye on the communist government of Cuba which aligned itself with Russia during the 1960s which then imported nuclear weapons into Cuba.


Those who do not recall the Cuban Missile Crisis of the 1960s need to read: The Cuban Missile Crisis and Threat of Nuclear War

The Guantanamo Naval Station is a strategic outpost on a landmass ninety miles from our shores. What ought to be discussed is, what does Obama intend to do with this asset if he succeeds in releasing the terrorists which are now housed there.

Considering Obama's love affair with the terrorist government of Iran, and his various policies which have emboldened our enemies and weaken the United States, and his latest love affair with the communist government of Cuba, should he not be asked what he proposes to do with Americas naval station in Cuba if he succeeds in releasing the remaining terrorist combatants who are held there?

JWK



When will the America People realize we have an Islamic cell operating out of our nation's White House? Will they come to this conclusion when Islamic terrorist activities begin in our southern Border States or cities like New York City?


all of it here:
Obama's desire to close down GITMO may be about his nefarious alliances.
 
Iran's State of the Union Power Play

January 12, 2016


Daniel Greenfield

obama-iran.jpg


The little naval incident with Iran has been perfectly timed to sabotage Obama's last big public hurrah. Of all of Iran's post-deal power plays, this one had to have struck closest to home. It wasn't the fate of American sailors that would have worried Obama. But having his entire policy agenda upstaged by an Iranian hostage crisis.

Whatever added deal was struck for a smooth exit strategy shows how thoroughly appeasing terrorists allows them to set the agenda.

Iran may be a state, but it's a terror state and its tactics depend heavily on the old terrorist standby of negotiate and then escalate. Iran has been escalating. And Obama has been negotiating.

...

Iran's State of the Union Power Play
 
Islam is a religion of fear, with many Muslims fearing their own faith.
...
The Mullahs' Historic Victory

Iran will spend every dollar on fighting the "Great Satan."

January 19, 2016
Dr. Majid Rafizadeh

pl_4.jpg


We just handed over hundreds of billions of dollars to the Islamist regime of Iran and its military establishment, which publicly shouts “Death to America.” It openly threatens US security and scuttles US national interests in the region. This is going to be marked as one of the most catastrophic deals of our generation.

The ruling clerics of Iran will now begin to receive relief from major United Nations Security Council sanctions as well as unilateral Western sanctions. The Islamic Republic will immediately receive roughly $90 billion. European countries will lift sanctions on major industries such as gold and metal. The White House will remove major Iranian entities and individuals from the sanctions list. More fundamentally, the lifting of these sanctions will allow the Iranian regime to re-enter the international banking world, and sell oil on the global market.

Implementation Day contains one major loophole. If Iran decided to resume its nuclear proliferation after sanctions are lifted, there is no adequate UNSC mechanism to roll back sanctions. Because of the geopolitical rivalry between the West, Russia, and China, getting Moscow and Beijing back on the same page is not going to be easy.

In addition, as the European firms will be investing in Iran’s oil and gas markets, they will have less incentive to join the US in pushing for re-imposition of sanctions if Iran heads towards building a nuclear bomb. More than 190 waivers have already been granted by the State Department.

Moreover, the one-year breakout time is not an adequate timeframe to react in, even if the international community caught Iran violating the agreement. Finally, after 10 years, Iran will be allowed to enrich uranium or spin centrifuges at any level that it desires, and the embargo on Iran’s ballistic missiles will be lifted.
It is difficult to comprehend how the International Atomic Energy Agency was able to inspect all nuclear facilities in Iran, approve all the aforementioned conditions, and green-light the Islamic Republic’s compliance in only five months.
Will the Implementation Day influence the Islamic Republic’s foreign policy, as President Obama has suggested?
By analyzing Iran’s foreign policy closely, all evidence indicates that Iran’s anti-Americanism, anti-Semitism and reliance on the application of hard power in the region will instead escalate.

...

The Mullahs' Historic Victory
 
I truly believe Obama is traitor and an enemy WITHIN. And this thing with Iran we will end paying for here at home BIG TIME. LETS Just hope it's not with a nuclear bomb
 
Obama's Normalization with Iran is Collaboration
How the Mullahs use the illusion of normalization to wage war on us.
January 20, 2016
Daniel Greenfield

or.jpg


Obama and his political allies seek normalization with Iran. They are unconcerned with Iran’s nuclear weapons programs or its support for terrorism and they are willing to provide fig leaves for these and other threats by the Shiite terror state to the United States and to the rest of the free world.

Iran, however, is looking to escalate its conflict with the United States. Perversely, normalization is the best strategy for escalating a conflict with the United States while extracting maximum benefit from it.

Without normalization, Iran has few options for escalating its conflict with America. Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) generals are fanatics, but they know that they cannot win a major military conflict with the United States. Instead, the IRGC terror hub seeks to carry out attacks that hurt the United States, but in ways that fall short of summoning up a full American military reprisal.

Under Obama, Iran has more options than ever because the United States is now willing to tolerate what it would not have tolerated in the past. But excessive escalation would still risk a scenario in which even a pro-Iranian administration would be left with no choice but to strike back at Iran. And Iran remembers the lessons of Operation Praying Mantis all too well. It has nothing to gain by losing billions in precious military equipment while the United States demonstrates its superior firepower.

Iran’s terror attacks have traditionally depended on a degree of plausible deniability. Shiite militias backed by the IRGC, from Hezbollah to the latest kidnappers of Americans in Baghdad, do the dirty work. Iran would supply IEDs to terrorists in Iraq and Afghanistan killing 500 Americans. It would provide a certain degree of training and aid to Al Qaeda, but without direct involvement in its attacks.

Iran would indirectly kill hundreds and even thousands of Americans, but with enough distance that it did not have to fear Americans bombers flying over Tehran. Under the same strategic logic, it may pass on nuclear materials to terrorists to use against the United States as long as it doesn’t fear retaliation.

Normalization, however, allows Iran to take its war against the United States to the next level.

In the deadlier phase of plausible deniability, the victims of Iranian terror have been so compromised that the affected governments themselves treasonously lead the cover-up of Iranian terror attacks.

A classic example of this, the bombing of the Jewish community center in Buenos Aires, an attack which everyone knows that Iran is responsible for, but which the local authorities were motivated to cover up because of their entanglement with Iran. Twenty years later, the cover-up led to the murder of a prosecutor who was investigating his own government’s complicity in covering up the attack.

This is what normalization accomplishes. Like the former Argentinean government, the Democrats have been compromised by their support for the Iran deal. The process began earlier when they decided to turn against the Iraq War and make outreach to the enemy into their foreign policy. Obama and other Senate Democrats refused to brand the IRGC a terrorist organization despite its role in the mass murder of American soldiers. Now they have to excuse the IRGC’s abuse of captured American sailors and any other attacks by the Shiite terror state to protect their act of collaboration in the dirty deal with Iran.

Normalization is more properly named collaboration. The collaborator is a traitor who has to excuse his treason by rationalizing the atrocities of the enemy. Iran’s Democratic Party collaborators have to explain how “nice” Iran is being by releasing American hostages. Like all collaborators, the traitors emphasize the benevolence of the enemy while overlooking the crime that benevolence is based on. They trumpet their success in getting special favors from the enemy as proof that collaboration works.

Kerry rushed to thank Iran for freeing the hostages without ever addressing the fact that taking the hostages was itself a crime. Instead of dealing with the original crime, the Democrats, like all traitors, rush to accuse opponents of being extremists who seek conflict over diplomacy. This was the same exact argument that Communist collaborators with Hitler during the era of the Soviet-Nazi pact directed at the West. It was the same argument that British anti-war activists aimed at domestic opponents of Hitler.


...

Obama's Normalization with Iran is Collaboration
 
kerry_bunnysuit.jpg


...


IRAN SHOWS THE U.S. WHO’S IN CHARGE

John Kerry’s “safer world” grows more perilous by the day.
January 28, 2016
Robert Spencer

qs.jpg


When the U.N. certified that the Iranians were in compliance with the nuclear agreement and sanctions were removed in mid-January, John Kerry proclaimed, “The world is safer today.” That was on January 18. On January 27,Iran warnedthe U.S. that a Navy vessel and fighter jet had gotten too close to an Iranian military drill, and told the Americans to back off. It was just the latest of numerous indications that in John Kerry’s safer world, Iran is in charge.

This warning followeda tweet last Sundayfrom Iran’s Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, featuring a photo of the American sailors that Iran captured and briefly held hostage earlier in January. The sailors were kneeling with their hands behind their heads. Khamenei added other photos of himself smiling with the Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps (IRGC) forces that captured the Americans along with a text congratulating them.

Khameneitweetedhis words to the IRGC: “What you did was very great, interesting and timely and it was in fact God’s deed that took Americans to our waters so that through your timely job they raised their hands over their heads and were arrested.”

One might almost get the impression that Khamenei thinks Iran is embroiled in a war. The head of Iran’s armed forces, Major General Hassan Firouzabadi, gave the same impression when hedeclared: “This incident in the Persian Gulf, which probably will not be the American forces’ last mistake in the region, should be a lesson to troublemakers in the U.S. Congress.”

The new Boss of the region would certainly let the U.S. know when it made more “mistakes.” The Iranians claimed that the American sailors were weak: Hossein Salami, the deputy commander of Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC),crowed:

“American sailors started crying after arrest, but the kindness of our Guard made them feel calm.” He boasted that “since the end of the Second World War, no country has been able to arrest American military personnel” – until now.

IRGC commander Ahmad Dolabiadded: “I saw the weakness, cowardice, and fear of American soldiers myself. Despite having all of the weapons and equipment, they surrendered themselves with the first action of the guardians of Islam. American forces receive the best training and have the most advanced weapons in the world, but they did not have the power to confront the Guard due to weakness of faith and belief.”

This crowing over America’s alleged weakness comes after numerous statements by Iranian leaders saying they wanted to confront the U.S. militarily, and that such a confrontation was inevitable. On February 11, 2014, the 35th anniversary of the Islamic Revolution in Iran, Defense Minister Hossein Dehghansaid:

The Defense Ministry is working to ensure that the Iranian people are armed and ready to confront any enemy threat. Yesterday’s successful test of Iranian-made ballistic missiles was also a crushing response to the nonsense of the American officials who frequently threaten Iran. It is a clear answer to their military option.

The Defense Ministry and the Iranian nation are always ready, and Iran will welcome it if the Americans again put themselves to the test and face the consequences. The Americans will again be defeated, just as they were in the Iran-Iraq war. If they implement their nonsense, the Iranian nation will hand them a crushing defeat.

Firouzabadi onceboasted: “Iran is prepared for the decisive war against the U.S. and the Zionist regime.…Iran has been making plans, conducting maneuvers, and preparing its forces for this battle for years now.”

...

Iran Shows the U.S. Who’s in Charge
 
Last edited:
AFTER IRAN CAPTURED US SAILORS, OBAMA LETS IRAN'S FLY DRONE OVERUSS HARRY TRUMAN
January 29, 2016
Daniel Greenfield

obama-iran_2.jpg


Iran keeps pushing and Obama keeps backing away and retreating.

...

Now, note the contrast.

When US vessels supposedly wound up in Iranian waters (though there's no way to know whether this is true since it's clear by now that Obama and his cronies will tell any lie on behalf of Iran), the Shiite terror state seized American sailors at gunpoint and degraded them, even they obviously posed no danger.

But Obama forces the US Navy to let Iranian drones overfly US vessels because they "posed no danger". This is what appeasement looks like. There was a pattern of similar incidents before WW2. And the end was inevitable. Aggressors push harder and harder, testing to see if a theoretically stronger nation will fight back. When they see that it doesn't, the real war begins.

After Iran Captured US Sailors, Obama Lets Iran's Fly Drone Over USS Harry Truman
 
Iran's Proxies to Create 'Islamic Republics'
Dollars flow to expand Islamist ideology of Iran and its proxies.
February 9, 2016
Dr. Majid Rafizadeh

ayatollah_khomeini.jpg


Iran has created an Islamist empire through its loyal proxies in dozens of countries. More recently, these Iranian Islamist proxies have become empowered and emboldened on an unprecedented level. Their leaders are publicly announcing their desire to create Islamist states, which are modeled after the Islamic Republic of Iran.

For example, this week, the Deputy Secretary-General of Hezbollah, Naim Qassem, pointed out in an interview with a state-owned Iranian outlet that he truly believes that “Islam is the solution to all of man’s problems, in all places and at all times.” As a result, he contends that it is a “doctrinal and cultural imperative” to overthrow the secular state in Lebanon and set up an Islamic Shiite political system. He also desires that new state precisely resemble the one created by Ayatollah Rooh Allah Khomeini, the autocrat founder of the Islamic Republic of Iran who tried to establish a political establishment similar to that of Muhammad over 1400 years ago.

...

Iran's Proxies to Create 'Islamic Republics'
 
Iran is, indeed, a rational actor more-or-less that deserves to be treated like a legitimate country. They are a member to all treaties and international groups just like other nations, and though they do not treat their citizens as well as they perhaps should, they are one of the more non-violent countries in that region. They have not invaded another country in a century. Their support of "terrorism" is a subjective point of view. I'm sure when the U.S. supported the Mujahadeen in Afghanistan in the 1980s, the Soviets felt we were supporting terrorists as well. It's a matter of perspective. If Iran wants to support Hezbollah, Hamas, whoever, they are allowed to do so. Even if they are not, bringing up their alleged human rights issues or terrorist support is an ad hominem, smoke screen argument meant to distract from the issue at hand, and de-legitimize them as a country.

Thus paragraph pretty much eliminates any credibility you might have ever had on this forum. Calling iran and its current diseased, cancerous terrorist regime of thugs and murderers "legitimate" is a sign of mental illness, or being on someone's payroll - neither is very appealing.

BTW, the US supported the mujahadeen, not al qaeda.
 
The Afghan mujahadeen were the fathers of the Taliban. Same people, just that they were bombing Russian financed girls schools.
 
Iran Promotes the Terrorist Behind the Deaths of 241 Americans
How Obama has emboldened the Iranian terror state.
February 19, 2016
Dr. Majid Rafizadeh
hossein-dehqan_1.jpg


In 1983 a horrific act of terrorism killed 241 American servicemen (220 Marines, 18 sailors, and three soldiers) in Beirut, Lebanon. The bombing marked the deadliest attack on Americans overseas since World War II.

...

Second, the United Nations Security Council Resolution 1929 that states "Iran shall not undertake any activity related to ballistic missiles capable of delivering nuclear weapons, including launches using ballistic missile technology, and that States shall take all necessary measures to prevent the transfer of technology or technical assistance to Iran related to such activities.”

Third, JCPOA (UNSCR 2231 Annex II, paragraph three) states that Iran should not undertake any ballistic missiles activity "until the date eight years after the JCPOA Adoption Day or until the date on which the IAEA submits a report confirming the Broader Conclusion, whichever is earlier."

Once again Iran has ignored the UN without challenge – last fall the Islamic Republic and its Minister of Defense repeatedly violated UNSC resolutions right after the nuclear deal by test-firing long-range ballistic missiles and laser-guided surface-to-surface missiles in October and November on several occasions -- yet no global power raised any objections to Iran’s activities.

It is worth noting that of the five members of the UNSC four members out of the five seem to be on the side of Iran for political and economic reasons (Russia, China, UK and France). As long as the fifth member, the United States, does not raise any objections to Iranian activities, the Islamist clerics of Iran can get away with almost any violation or crime against humanity.

In closing, it is clear that not only Iran has violated the international law and UNSC resolutions but is preparing for conflict with a terrorist at the helm.

Iran Promotes the Terrorist Behind the Deaths of 241 Americans
 
Iran Celebrates Obama Billions w/New Bounty on Salman Rushdie
February 24, 2016
Daniel Greenfield

khomeini-750x421.gif


Everyone knew that Iran was going to put Obama's billions to use financing terrorism, but I don't think anyone expected them to bring back that terror classic. But there's nothing like Muslims when it comes to grudges. The Sunnis and Shiites are still mad at each other over a thousand year grudge. So don't expect them to forget about Salman Rushdie anytime soon.

...

Next time anyone quotes Fars, here's a little reminder, it's an actual terrorist organization. So is the entire regime. The one Obama decided to pump billions into while Iran continues pursuing its nuclear weapons program.

Oh by the way, the Satanic Verses is a reference to those times when Mohammed got his prophecies from Satan. (No seriously, this is Islamic doctrine.) So you can see why Islamic theologians have no sense of humor about it. Or anything else that doesn't involve brutally murdering infidels.

Iran Celebrates Obama Billions w/New Bounty on Salman Rushdie
 
The agreement bans Iran from launching missiles "designed" to deliver nuclear weapons. The missile launched by Iran was not "designed" to deliver nuclear weapons. It was designed to put a communications satellite in orbit.
 
The agreement does not say "capable".

The house idiot does not grasp that the technology for nuke-capable missiles is BASED upon that which launches satellites into orbit, as the trajectories, missile weight, components, resistance forces, gravitation forces, and temperatures encountered will be very similar.

Of course everyone knows that. However, no nation will sign up to an agreement that prohibits it from launching satellites. That's why the language finally agreed to prohibits missiles "designed" to carry nuclear warheads. Iran is free to develop and launch heavy lift rockets designed for putting satellites in orbit.
 
Obama Inc. Still Pushing the "All Options" Scam on Iran
March 9, 2016
Daniel Greenfield
obama-iran.jpg


For the longest time, Obama and his cronies would say that, "All options are open" or "All options are on the table" when it came to Iran. Gullible folks were supposed to hear that and think that Iran's nuclear program was going to be taken out. Actually it meant that all options were open for appeasing Iran. Which is exactly what happened.

But for anyone foolish enough to still believe, Joe Biden is still talking "All options are open".

...

I'm reassured. How about you?

Iran is still pursuing a nuclear weapons program. That much has been made clear. Obama personally cut Iran a check for billions, even aside from pulling down the sanctions. That's more than Biden's $200 million. The money is being used to finance terrorism against America and Israel.

But all options are on the table... for aiding Iran and the terrorists.

Obama Inc. Still Pushing the "All Options" Scam on Iran
 

Forum List

Back
Top