Obama accused of fraud and intimidation in Primary against Hillary

How many times do I have to say the guy is an asshole?

BTW where is all your proof that there is a big faction of Americans who believe like this asshole does?

Did you just fucking lie about it?

That's it? He's an asshole? That's your argument? Now I totally see.

So does Bush get a pass because I say he's an asshole?

And because you don't have an understanding of the make up of the Black Panther organization, gives you cause to accuse me of lying about the number of people involved?

Seriously?

Well, here you go....educate yourself.

New Black Panther Party for Self Defense: Introduction
 
Oh it was never used huh?

You dont have the facts do you?

It was used in the 2000 election and it took the people until 2004 to get the republicans in office to STOP using it.

Of course you have evidence of this. And some specifics?

I know you don't because you're a lying ignoramus.

Florida Central Voter File - Definition

oopps your wrong, the proof is in the court records you fucking idiot

This has exactly what to do with republicans?
 
Just denying the cold hard facts given you does not make you right you partisan hack
 
YouTube - Evidence - Obama Stole Election Against Hillary Voter Intimidation And Fraud

She's a democrat. Her Grandfather was Governor of Mass. This is an attack from his own people.
In 2008, Ms. Gaston was involved in directing a documentary about the alleged irregularities[2] in the caucuses that were part of the 2008 Democratic party presidential primaries


pop-weeklyA_thumb_w_580.jpg


Gigi Gaston: The Black Flower - Grids - SPD.ORG - Grids

Synopsis

In 1900 Paris, Honoré Lachaille, elderly connoisseur of beauty and fashion, strolls through the Bois de Bologne, appreciating the splendor of youth personified by spirited school girl Gigi Alvarez. Later, Honoré meets his elegant nephew Gaston, the wealthy heir to a sugar empire, who declares his weariness at being the center of Paris society. To Honoré's surprise, Gaston admits the only place that he can relax is at the modest flat of Honoré `s former paramour, Mme. Alvarez, Gigi's grandmother and guardian. Meanwhile, at her weekly etiquette lessons with her regal great-aunt Alicia, Gigi struggles to stifle her natural buoyancy while learning about the intricacies of dining...

...That evening while dining with Liane and Honoré at Maxim's restaurant, Gaston realizes that despite Liane's effusive attentions, her thoughts are elsewhere. The next morning Gaston tells Honoré that he is deeply insulted to have learned from private detectives that Liane is secretly seeing her skating instructor. When Gaston hints that he will end his relationship with Liane through a note, Honoré insists that the break-up must be in keeping with Gaston's stylish reputation.... Gigi and her grandmother follow Gaston's subsequent revelries through the society newspaper columns and several weeks pass before he visits them again. Arriving one evening bearing chocolates and champagne, Gaston reveals that he will soon be going to Trouville-by-the-Sea. After Mme....

...would rather be unhappy with him than without him and agrees to the arrangement. Although unsure about the undertaking, Gigi, beautifully dressed, accompanies Gaston to join the society crowd at Maxim's. Using all of Alicia's tips...http://www.tcm.com/tcmdb/title.jsp?stid=12586
 
Last edited:
""If we had a sworn complaint, which on its face was legally sufficient, we would proceed and look into the matter and see. But one of the requirements to find a violation is that there is willfulness. So if you had a person who had accidentally been removed during the purging of the election records, that would not be a willful violation. You would have to have someone who was deliberately removing people when they should not be removed, for there to be an election law violation."

From your own dumbass link.
 
How many times do I have to say the guy is an asshole?

BTW where is all your proof that there is a big faction of Americans who believe like this asshole does?

Did you just fucking lie about it?

That's it? He's an asshole? That's your argument? Now I totally see.

So does Bush get a pass because I say he's an asshole?

And because you don't have an understanding of the make up of the Black Panther organization, gives you cause to accuse me of lying about the number of people involved?

Seriously?

Well, here you go....educate yourself.

New Black Panther Party for Self Defense: Introduction

There numbers are not huge like you said now are they?
 
Just denying the cold hard facts given you does not make you right you partisan hack

Your own link asserts no crime was committed.
Nor does it connect it in any way to Republicans.

So per usual, liar, you have submitted no cold hard facts, liar, despite your assertion to the contrary, liar. You submitted evidence that what you said was a lie, liar, and then lied about what the evidence was, liar.
 
Last edited:
2000 Florida Election Controversy
Names were ordered by the Florida state government to include legal voters
At first, Florida specified only exact matches on names, birthdates and genders to identify voters as felons. However, state records reveal a memo dated March, 1999 from Emmett "Bucky" Mitchell, a lawyer for the state elections office who was supervising the felon purge, asking DBT to loosen its criteria for acceptable matches. When DBT representatives warned Mitchell that this would yield a large proportion of "false positives" (mismatches), Mitchell's reply was that it would be up to each county elections supervisor to deal with the problem.

In February 2000, in a phone conversation to the BBC's London studios, ChoicePoint vice president James Lee said that the State "wanted there to be more names than were actually verified as being a convicted felon."

On April 17, 2001 ChoicePoint VP James Lee testified, before the McKinney panel, that the state had given DBT the directive to add to the purge list people who matched 90 percent of a last name. DBT objected, knowing this would sweep in a huge number of innocents. The state then ordered DBT to shift to an 80 percent match. Names were also reversed — felon Thomas Clarence could knock out the vote of Clarence Thomas. James Lee confirmed that middle initials were skipped, “Jr.” and “Sr.” suffixes dropped, adding that nicknames and aliases were added to puff up the list.
 
2000 Florida Election Controversy
Names were ordered by the Florida state government to include legal voters
At first, Florida specified only exact matches on names, birthdates and genders to identify voters as felons. However, state records reveal a memo dated March, 1999 from Emmett "Bucky" Mitchell, a lawyer for the state elections office who was supervising the felon purge, asking DBT to loosen its criteria for acceptable matches. When DBT representatives warned Mitchell that this would yield a large proportion of "false positives" (mismatches), Mitchell's reply was that it would be up to each county elections supervisor to deal with the problem.

In February 2000, in a phone conversation to the BBC's London studios, ChoicePoint vice president James Lee said that the State "wanted there to be more names than were actually verified as being a convicted felon."

On April 17, 2001 ChoicePoint VP James Lee testified, before the McKinney panel, that the state had given DBT the directive to add to the purge list people who matched 90 percent of a last name. DBT objected, knowing this would sweep in a huge number of innocents. The state then ordered DBT to shift to an 80 percent match. Names were also reversed — felon Thomas Clarence could knock out the vote of Clarence Thomas. James Lee confirmed that middle initials were skipped, “Jr.” and “Sr.” suffixes dropped, adding that nicknames and aliases were added to puff up the list.

Proof of a crime, dipshit.
Or that the Republicans had anything to do with it.

God you're stupid.
 
Just denying the cold hard facts given you does not make you right you partisan hack

Your own link asserts no crime was committed.
Nor does it connect it in any way to Republicans.

So per usual, liar, you have submitted no cold hard facts, liar, despite your assertion to the contrary, liar. You submitted evidence that what you said was a lie, liar, and then lied about what the evidence was, liar.

OMG...you're trying to put her in a rage induced coma aren't you? LOL
 
Phyllis Hampton, general counsel of the Florida Elections Commission, testified that her office could investigate the wrongful removal of a Floridian from the voter rolls if there was evidence of a willful violation. Ms. Hampton stated:

"If we had a sworn complaint, which on its face was legally sufficient, we would proceed and look into the matter and see. But one of the requirements to find a violation is that there is willfulness. So if you had a person who had accidentally been removed during the purging of the election records, that would not be a willful violation. You would have to have someone who was deliberately removing people when they should not be removed, for there to be an election law violation."

That was the lawyer for teh people who commited the crime you asshole
 
YouTube - Evidence - Obama Stole Election Against Hillary Voter Intimidation And Fraud

She's a democrat. Her Grandfather was Governor of Mass. This is an attack from his own people.

Where is this woman lying?

She's supposed to be a granddaughter of a Democratic Governor of Massachusetts, and she says she didn't set out to allege fraud, never thought she'd see election irregularities...


She claims she got a phone call telling her to go down there (Texas). She went down there to prove everyone wrong? :lol:
 
Phyllis Hampton, general counsel of the Florida Elections Commission, testified that her office could investigate the wrongful removal of a Floridian from the voter rolls if there was evidence of a willful violation. Ms. Hampton stated:

"If we had a sworn complaint, which on its face was legally sufficient, we would proceed and look into the matter and see. But one of the requirements to find a violation is that there is willfulness. So if you had a person who had accidentally been removed during the purging of the election records, that would not be a willful violation. You would have to have someone who was deliberately removing people when they should not be removed, for there to be an election law violation."

That was the lawyer for teh people who commited the crime you asshole

what crime?
 
Phyllis Hampton, general counsel of the Florida Elections Commission, testified that her office could investigate the wrongful removal of a Floridian from the voter rolls if there was evidence of a willful violation. Ms. Hampton stated:

"If we had a sworn complaint, which on its face was legally sufficient, we would proceed and look into the matter and see. But one of the requirements to find a violation is that there is willfulness. So if you had a person who had accidentally been removed during the purging of the election records, that would not be a willful violation. You would have to have someone who was deliberately removing people when they should not be removed, for there to be an election law violation."

That was the lawyer for teh people who commited the crime you asshole

what crime?

The crime they know they commited and dropped the list right after they were forced to provide the names which were on it.
 

Forum List

Back
Top