Oaths and Oil Execs

The ClayTaurus

Senior Member
Sep 19, 2005
7,062
333
48
Can someone explain why the oil execs weren't required to be under oath when they testified? Is that a fairly standard operating procedure? I haven't been able to find any supportive explanation for why it was ok, only people bitching about it...
 
dmp said:
becuase they are in GWB's back pocket? :)
I'm really not trying to be smarmy, I never knew that you could testify without being under oath... what determines whether you do or don't?
 

Forum List

Back
Top