Discussion in 'Tea Party' started by basquebromance, Feb 10, 2018.
let's revive it!
For Republicans, the Tea Party Is Over
SO, the New York Times sees a collapse of a movement focused on dealing with our financial death spiral and they don't spend a single drop of ink on discussing the actual issue.
Historians, if there are any in the future, will find that very telling about an once great nation.
I guess better late than never.
Good luck with that - now that the Muslim Marxist from Kenya (the black dude) is gone and Trump is adding 3 trillion to the deficit, they've faded into the woodwork and just don't care anymore.
When Dems take back the House and White House - the baggers, birthers & blowhards'll crawl out from under their rocks again - SOCIALISM!
It amazes me that lefties can in one sentence race bait with the idea that the opposition from the right against Obama was based on him being "the black dude"
and in the very next sentence predict that the same opposition to the next dem president regardless of race.
Dr love, could you edit your post and replace your period with a comma?
It would be funnier if you did that in the very same sentence.
Your ability to hold contradictory ideas and believe both of them, is absolutely incredible.
Nah, I'm happy with my post as is. If you didn't grasp that a large part of the Tea Party's initial success involved racism (see Birtherism) then you weren't paying attention in the slightest.
The next iteration of the TP when D's take things back over probably won't involve Birtherism (unless of course Kamala Harris or Cory Booker is our candidate ;-) but it will involve the debt once again, taxes, and a whole bunch of blowhards. And of course, if we put up a woman it will most certainly involve sexism.
It's who the Republican Party is at present sadly. You're not conservatives any more, your "Trumpists" who have all sold their souls. Sad
I'm sorry that you won't combine the two sentences into one, but the absurdity of your position is still just as absurd.
Your additional race baiting is noted.
Pretty much the same incredible contradictory thinking, you clearly state that you expect the same resistance to any democratic president, regardless of gender or race, but still insist that there is racism or sexism in the motivation if the dem in question is a woman or a minority.
Lets do some more.
So, you see racism when a white republican opposes a black democrat.
Soooo, do you see racism when a black democrat opposes a white republican?
I know that answer, I just want to see you post it.
If you explain the difference, please try to do it in one sentence. As a favor?PLEASE?!!!!!
Pointing out racism is not "race baiting" - Up your game Trumpist!
Falsely accusing your enemies of racism is race baiting, and you are certainly that.
I asked you a question, fairly simple and an obvious one in light of your ability to read minds of people who opposed Obama, ie knowing that they were racist even though they would have opposed any other dem president too,
Is it racist for a black dem to oppose a white republican?
Separate names with a comma.