NYT – It's Okay to Show a Picture of Mary Covered in Dung

[longknife]

But don't you dare show a cartoon of Muhamad


The hypocrisy is incredible. But, what else can be expected from this leftist, progressive rag? Why? Because you know nobody will kill you for it!


Read more @ You are being redirected...

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

But don't you dare show a cartoon of Muhamad


The hypocrisy is incredible. But, what else can be expected from this leftist, progressive rag? Why? Because you know nobody will kill you for it!


Read more @ You are being redirected...

No, your stupidity is incredible, along with your propensity to lie as is common to most on the right.

Nowhere in the Times article was there mention made of Mohammad cartoons, nor did the article opine that it was appropriate to show the Virgin Mary display but not cartoons of Mohammad – it's just another one of your lies.

Most conservatives are truly reprehensible.

 

[Book of Jeremiah]

No one has ever seen a photograph of Mary. No one knows her image and therein no person or organization can create one. Whatever they will use as an image of Mary will not be her and therein there is nothing accomplished.

I have seen pictures depicting Mary with pale white skin, blonde hair and blue eyes and I have to laugh because Mary was Jewish! ( the odds of that being what she looks like are not very good). Sadly there are always those out there with an agenda.

 

[Porker]

So? The Dimocrat NY Times actions surprises you? After all, it has always been the MOUTHPIECE for All Other Regressive News Organizations in this country AKA THE DimocratRIVE-BY MEDIA.

 

[Camp]

But don't you dare show a cartoon of Muhamad


The hypocrisy is incredible. But, what else can be expected from this leftist, progressive rag? Why? Because you know nobody will kill you for it!


Read more @ You are being redirected...

No, your stupidity is incredible, along with your propensity to lie as is common to most on the right.

Nowhere in the Times article was there mention made of Mohammad cartoons, nor did the article opine that it was appropriate to show the Virgin Mary display but not cartoons of Mohammad – it's just another one of your lies.

Most conservatives are truly reprehensible.

It is a work of abstract art done in a 20th Century contemporary style by a famous artist and valued at over 2.25 million dollars. If not told what it was by the title the critics would not recognize the African Virgin Mary, dung or so called porn. The article is in the Arts section. Most would probably respond that it looks like something a kid would make.

 

[prison/con.net]

and if not told that the monkey in the cartoon was Mohommad, it would just be another monkey

 

[PredFan]

But don't you dare show a cartoon of Muhamad


The hypocrisy is incredible. But, what else can be expected from this leftist, progressive rag? Why? Because you know nobody will kill you for it!


Read more @ You are being redirected...

No, your stupidity is incredible, along with your propensity to lie as is common to most on the right.

Nowhere in the Times article was there mention made of Mohammad cartoons, nor did the article opine that it was appropriate to show the Virgin Mary display but not cartoons of Mohammad – it's just another one of your lies.

Most conservatives are truly reprehensible.

What an idiot you are. You think that because the NYT didn't say it means it isn't true eh? You are a dumbass of the highest order. You know damned well that the NYT would never ever show a crtoon of Muhammad.

How you can be that ignorant and yet use a computer or equivalent device is the real mystery.

 

[Rozman]

Christ on the cross,Mary the mother of God,covered in shit,the American flag pissed on....
Liberals love that...Freedom of speech,freedom of expression.
I don't like it.I hate it.But we have the freedom to do it....

Draw a cartoon of Mohammed and the Liberals go off the wall batshit crazy....

 

[theDoctorisIn]

Have any of you guys actually seen the painting of the Virgin Mary that you're all so butthurt about?

 

[longknife]

But don't you dare show a cartoon of Muhamad


The hypocrisy is incredible. But, what else can be expected from this leftist, progressive rag? Why? Because you know nobody will kill you for it!


Read more @ You are being redirected...

No, your stupidity is incredible, along with your propensity to lie as is common to most on the right.

Nowhere in the Times article was there mention made of Mohammad cartoons, nor did the article opine that it was appropriate to show the Virgin Mary display but not cartoons of Mohammad – it's just another one of your lies.

Most conservatives are truly reprehensible.

Did you read the link?

The New York Times’ hypocrisy regarding displays of “offensive” religious imagery runs unabated, as shown in a Scott Reyburn article in Friday’s Arts section on the sale of Chris Ofili’s controversial painting “The Holy Virgin Mary,” which shows the Virgin Mary clotted with elephant dung against a porn-collage background — and accompanied by a photograph of the offensive work.


Yet when the paper refused to reprint a cartoon of Muhammad that appeared in the Paris satirical magazine Charlie Hebdo that resulted in the January 2015 massacre of 12 magazine staffers, it offered this smug, cowardly justification:


Under Times standards, we do not normally publish images or other material deliberately intended to offend religious sensibilities. After careful consideration, Times editors decided that describing the cartoons in question would give readers sufficient information to understand today’s story.

 

[Camp]

Have any of you guys actually seen the painting of the Virgin Mary that you're all so butthurt about?

Yes, I have. Like I already commented, it is an abstract work and without being told, it is highly doubtful that anyone would recognize it as Mary covered in dung and surrounded by porn. I would bet and give odds that if unsuspecting persons were shown the painting, none of them would interpret it as a black Mother Mary covered in dung and surrounded by porn.
You can see it by clicking on the red highlighted Friday Arts section in the OP link.