NYT clears Romney: No Evidence Romney lied

[Lakhota]

Exclusive: Mitt Romney cites “independent fact-checkers” to spare him from having to explain exactly what he did with Bain Capital after February 1999. But those “fact-checkers” are acting less like impartial journalists and more like argumentative lawyers covering Romney’s political flanks, writes Robert Parry.

The Romney ‘Fact-Checking’ Scandal | Consortiumnews

 

[GoneBezerk]

The kooks here are left of the NY Times......

 

[salem.hills]

Retroactive retirement. Holy shit, what kind of idiot did the wingnuts nominate?

Romney and his time machine

“He took a leave of absence,” Gillespie said, “and, in fact, Candy, he ended up not going back at all, and retired retroactively to February of 1999 as a result.”

Retroactive retirement! It was a brilliant formulation, perhaps the greatest addition to the political lexicon since “no controlling legal authority.” And it raised tantalizing possibilities: If Romney can do it, perhaps others can go back in time to rearrange events.

George W. Bush could retroactively end his presidency on Sept. 1, 2008, before the financial collapse. Donald Rumsfeld could retroactively pull out of Iraq before the insurgency. President Obama could retroactively deny government funding for Solyndra.

Romney isn't right wing

 

[Lakhota]

Retroactive retirement. Holy shit, what kind of idiot did the wingnuts nominate?

Romney and his time machine

“He took a leave of absence,” Gillespie said, “and, in fact, Candy, he ended up not going back at all, and retired retroactively to February of 1999 as a result.”

Retroactive retirement! It was a brilliant formulation, perhaps the greatest addition to the political lexicon since “no controlling legal authority.” And it raised tantalizing possibilities: If Romney can do it, perhaps others can go back in time to rearrange events.

George W. Bush could retroactively end his presidency on Sept. 1, 2008, before the financial collapse. Donald Rumsfeld could retroactively pull out of Iraq before the insurgency. President Obama could retroactively deny government funding for Solyndra.

Romney isn't right wing

True, but the wingnuts think so...

 

[Vidi]

Retroactive retirement. Holy shit, what kind of idiot did the wingnuts nominate?

Romney and his time machine

“He took a leave of absence,” Gillespie said, “and, in fact, Candy, he ended up not going back at all, and retired retroactively to February of 1999 as a result.”

Retroactive retirement! It was a brilliant formulation, perhaps the greatest addition to the political lexicon since “no controlling legal authority.” And it raised tantalizing possibilities: If Romney can do it, perhaps others can go back in time to rearrange events.

George W. Bush could retroactively end his presidency on Sept. 1, 2008, before the financial collapse. Donald Rumsfeld could retroactively pull out of Iraq before the insurgency. President Obama could retroactively deny government funding for Solyndra.

Romney isn't right wing

he is today.

Tomorrow maybe not.

Who knows? He flip flops depending on who hes talking to.

 

[Vidi]

How many different ways do Libs need to hear that Obama is a liar?

CNN said Obama lied about Romney

The Wa Post said he lied about Romney

Now the NYTimes said that Obama lied

Are our libs learning?

Actully, NONE of them have said that.

What they said was there was no evidence that Romney made "operational decisions." BIG difference. But I wouldnt expect a moron wingnut like you to understand the difference.

 

[Procrustes Stretched]

The kooks here are left of the NY Times......

NY Times?

Would that be this NY Tiimes: Newsmax gets right's panties wet?

NYT clears Romney: No Evidence Romney lied
NY Times: 'No Evidence' Romney Did Bain Business

 

[Procrustes Stretched]

How many different ways do Libs need to hear that Obama is a liar?

CNN said Obama lied about Romney

The Wa Post said he lied about Romney

Now the NYTimes said that Obama lied

Are our libs learning?

Newsmax!

NY Times: 'No Evidence' Romney Did Bain Business

Actual NYT Headline: In Tracing Romney’s Role at Bain, a Convoluted Timeline


we could go on, but why bother? Whacky Wingnut World is becoming Unhinged in real time.

 

[Liability]

Now the libs are gonna call it The NY SLIMES.

 

[Article 15]

Oh, and while we're at it, let's apply the same logic to Obama's college transcripts, mmmkay?

Or is that different? Somehow? It just is!

Has Mitt Romney released his college transcripts?

Dunno. Is he a part of "The Mostest Transparentest Administration in the History of Ever, And No, Our Fingers Aren't Crossed, Really!"?

You guys want the same standards applied to each candidate.

Obama has released his tax returns dating back to 2000 and Mitt Romney hasn't released his own college transcripts. Given those two facts, please specifically explain what this mysterious double standard is you guys are talking about.

 

[daveman]

Has Mitt Romney released his college transcripts?

Dunno. Is he a part of "The Mostest Transparentest Administration in the History of Ever, And No, Our Fingers Aren't Crossed, Really!"?

You guys want the same standards applied to each candidate.

Obama has released his tax returns dating back to 2000 and Mitt Romney hasn't released his own college transcripts. Given those two facts, please specifically explain what this mysterious double standard is you guys are talking about.

It's part of the overarching one:

1. Obama can do no wrong.

2. Romney is guilty.


Proof of either is not required. These are tenets of the faith.

 

[Article 15]

Dunno. Is he a part of "The Mostest Transparentest Administration in the History of Ever, And No, Our Fingers Aren't Crossed, Really!"?

You guys want the same standards applied to each candidate.

Obama has released his tax returns dating back to 2000 and Mitt Romney hasn't released his own college transcripts. Given those two facts, please specifically explain what this mysterious double standard is you guys are talking about.

It's part of the overarching one:

1. Obama can do no wrong.

2. Romney is guilty.


Proof of either is not required. These are tenets of the faith.

In other words, you got nothing.

Obama has released his tax returns.

Romney hasn't.

You can't cry "double standards" by bringing up college transcripts when Romney hasn't even released his.

Care to fail again or are you done now?