NY Times Welcomes Republican Tim Scott to Senate By Calling Him a “Token”

[Stephanie]

man people need to cancel the slimes rag...
links to article at site

SNIP:
NY Times Welcomes Republican Tim Scott to Senate By Calling Him a “Token”

Posted by Jim Hoft on Wednesday, December 19, 2012, 9:04 AM


The New York Times welcomed Republican Tim Scott to the US Senate by calling him a “token.”

snippet of the times peice at site


Republican Tim Scott is the only African American in the US Senate.
Mediaite reported, via Lucianne:


You have got to hand it to the New York Times’ editors – they’ve got moxy. A Times opinion piece on Tuesday introducing their readers to the newest Senator from the Palmetto State, former Rep. Tim Scott (R-SC), speaks about him – and those with who share his political affiliation and skin color – in the terms you would describe a curious science project. In “The Puzzle of Black Republicans,” the Times summons all the subtlety of the Kool-Aid Man as they smash through the perception that the “paper of record” maintains a single shred of neutrality as they advance the notion that non-Democratic African-Americans are a curiosity to be examined like some newly discovered species of fish.

Of course, it’s OK for liberals to call blacks “tokens” as long as they are Republicans.
Disgusting.

all of it here
NY Times Welcomes Republican Tim Scott to Senate By Calling Him a “Token” | The Gateway Pundit

 

[The Infidel]

Don't understand why more black Americans aren't disgusted by this.



Tim Scott is a good man.

 

[jillian]

Don't understand why more black Americans aren't disgusted by this.



Tim Scott is a good man.

Tim Scott is a teatard.

And the Times didn't quite call him a token, did they? They said it looked less like progress for blacks and MORE LIKE tokenism.

And if you're wondering why blacks run from the GOP, please, call our first black president the "food stamp" president again and say things like he doesn't think "like an American", and have your presidential candidates suck up to birfers.

The reality is that most blacks really are conservative. They're religious.... they could be GOP "values" voters, if the party didn't tolerate such a huge degree of racial insensitivity.

 

[Stephanie]

Don't understand why more black Americans aren't disgusted by this.



Tim Scott is a good man.

Tim Scott is a teatard.

And the Times didn't quite call him a token, did they? They said it looked less like progress for blacks and MORE LIKE tokenism.

And if you're wondering why blacks run from the GOP, please, call our first black president the "food stamp" president again and say things like he doesn't think "like an American", and have your presidential candidates suck up to birfers.

The reality is that most blacks really are conservative. They're religious.... they could be GOP "values" voters, if the party didn't tolerate such a huge degree of racial insensitivity.

oh boy, how are you going to untwist yourself from all that bullshit
PATHETIC..you are sticking up for this hateful piece by the Slimes, but not surprising you would be adding onto more shit to it..NOTHING could be said about this President because of his SKIN COLOR..or they would be accused of being a RACIST..worked out well for you all didn't it

 

[BillyV]

Don't understand why more black Americans aren't disgusted by this.



Tim Scott is a good man.

Tim Scott is a teatard.

And the Times didn't quite call him a token, did they? They said it looked less like progress for blacks and MORE LIKE tokenism.

And if you're wondering why blacks run from the GOP, please, call our first black president the "food stamp" president again and say things like he doesn't think "like an American", and have your presidential candidates suck up to birfers.

The reality is that most blacks really are conservative. They're religious.... they could be GOP "values" voters, if the party didn't tolerate such a huge degree of racial insensitivity.

Well actually, yes they did. The last line of the article is as follows: "No number of Tim Scotts — or other cynical tokens — will change that." The entire article implies that the appointment of Tim Scott - and other black conservatives before him - were "deployed ......to undermine black interests." It goes on to say that Scott was elected in 2010 on a platform of "anti-tax, anti-union and anti-abortion," which according to the author are "utterly at odds with the preferences of most black Americans," as though being a shill for "black" interests or any other interests makes one a more legitimate candidate.


Is it true that all black Americans are pro-tax, pro-union and pro-abortion?

 

[squeeze berry]

Don't understand why more black Americans aren't disgusted by this.



Tim Scott is a good man.

Tim Scott is a teatard.

And the Times didn't quite call him a token, did they? They said it looked less like progress for blacks and MORE LIKE tokenism.

And if you're wondering why blacks run from the GOP, please, call our first black president the "food stamp" president again and say things like he doesn't think "like an American", and have your presidential candidates suck up to birfers.

The reality is that most blacks really are conservative. They're religious.... they could be GOP "values" voters, if the party didn't tolerate such a huge degree of racial insensitivity.

hey, let us know when the CBC has a token honky and then we will talk.

in addition it is not the GOP that is saying that the Dems have too many whites or too many blacks or whatever.

It's you hypocrites that are counting black faces

 

[Amelia]

The race-hustling from the left is shameless.

 

[bodecea]

man people need to cancel the slimes rag...
links to article at site

SNIP:
NY Times Welcomes Republican Tim Scott to Senate By Calling Him a “Token”

Posted by Jim Hoft on Wednesday, December 19, 2012, 9:04 AM


The New York Times welcomed Republican Tim Scott to the US Senate by calling him a “token.”

snippet of the times peice at site


Republican Tim Scott is the only African American in the US Senate.
Mediaite reported, via Lucianne:


You have got to hand it to the New York Times’ editors – they’ve got moxy. A Times opinion piece on Tuesday introducing their readers to the newest Senator from the Palmetto State, former Rep. Tim Scott (R-SC), speaks about him – and those with who share his political affiliation and skin color – in the terms you would describe a curious science project. In “The Puzzle of Black Republicans,” the Times summons all the subtlety of the Kool-Aid Man as they smash through the perception that the “paper of record” maintains a single shred of neutrality as they advance the notion that non-Democratic African-Americans are a curiosity to be examined like some newly discovered species of fish.

Of course, it’s OK for liberals to call blacks “tokens” as long as they are Republicans.
Disgusting.

all of it here
NY Times Welcomes Republican Tim Scott to Senate By Calling Him a “Token” | The Gateway Pundit

Yeah...that's really really stupid.

 

[Pogo]

I just knew if either Gateway Plunderit or Jim Hoft were involved it would be yet another selective interpretation. And that it wouldn't include the original source, lest readers actually read it and check up on Hoft's usual bent. Here we have a Daily Double.

Sure enough, what the story actually says is:

But this “first black” rhetoric tends to interpret African-American political successes — including that of President Obama — as part of a morality play that dramatizes “how far we have come.” It obscures the fact that modern black Republicans have been more tokens than signs of progress.

That's a general statement about most "modern black Republicans" rather than specifically about Tim Scott. It includes him but it's not directed at him. And the rationale for that judgement is spelled out in the ensuing paragraphs, which is kind of the idea of making a point; you don't stop reading because you see the word tokens... you go on to see why it's there. Unless of course your real goal is to dumb-down the article into something it's not. The race hustling from Gateway Plunderit is shameless if not flameless.

Point 2, this article is an editorial, not "The New York Times". It's one person's opinion. You can kind of get a clue about that by his use of the first-person singular ("I"). It's a guest op-ed, written by a political science professor at Penn, not an editor at the Times (and he's black, if it matters).

But for point 3, let's go to Captain Obvious--
Ahem, thank you, at the risk of stating the obvious, to label Person X a "token" is a statement not about Person X, but about the action of the entity that put them there. In this case the acting entity would be the Republican Party. I can't believe you guys are so swimming in your own echo chamber of ideological swill that you can't see thi--Thank you Captain, that'll do for now.

I can see why Jim Hoft didn't go into law. He'd be laughed out of court every day. But nooooo, let's cancel the paper and call it the "Slimes" rather than read what it actually says. Let's take our cues from a hair-on-fire blog site that tells us about what the article said, rather than actually read it directly where we can judge for ourselves. Yeah there's a good plan. What could go wrong?

I'll never understand why some people want to outsource their political logic to the Blogs of the Bubble rather than DIY. Gateway Plunderit... a reliable source

 

[JimBowie1958]

Don't understand why more black Americans aren't disgusted by this.



Tim Scott is a good man.

Tim Scott is a teatard.

You racist scumbag.

 

[JimBowie1958]

man people need to cancel the slimes rag...
links to article at site

SNIP:
NY Times Welcomes Republican Tim Scott to Senate By Calling Him a “Token”

Posted by Jim Hoft on Wednesday, December 19, 2012, 9:04 AM


The New York Times welcomed Republican Tim Scott to the US Senate by calling him a “token.”

snippet of the times peice at site


Republican Tim Scott is the only African American in the US Senate.
Mediaite reported, via Lucianne:


You have got to hand it to the New York Times’ editors – they’ve got moxy. A Times opinion piece on Tuesday introducing their readers to the newest Senator from the Palmetto State, former Rep. Tim Scott (R-SC), speaks about him – and those with who share his political affiliation and skin color – in the terms you would describe a curious science project. In “The Puzzle of Black Republicans,” the Times summons all the subtlety of the Kool-Aid Man as they smash through the perception that the “paper of record” maintains a single shred of neutrality as they advance the notion that non-Democratic African-Americans are a curiosity to be examined like some newly discovered species of fish.

Of course, it’s OK for liberals to call blacks “tokens” as long as they are Republicans.
Disgusting.

all of it here
NY Times Welcomes Republican Tim Scott to Senate By Calling Him a “Token” | The Gateway Pundit

Yeah...that's really really stupid.

You should expect that from the NYT; hell, they act like Scott is blacker than Obama.

 

[Pogo]

Don't understand why more black Americans aren't disgusted by this.

By the Gateway Plunderit twist, I assume you mean?

As I just pointed out, the original editorial was written by a black American poli-sci professor. I think he's speaking on behalf of black Americans.

Who Gateway Plunderit is speaking on behalf of, that's a whole 'nother smoke.

 

[Pogo]

You should expect that from the NYT; hell, they act like Scott is blacker than Obama.

What the hell does that mean?

 

[JimBowie1958]

You should expect that from the NYT; hell, they act like Scott is blacker than Obama.

What the hell does that mean?

If one uses a person to be a token umptysquat, then you get someone who is 100% umptysquat. The point to having a token is to be able to say, see we have an umptysquat with us, and that doesnt work if the guy is half umptysquat and half poedunk.

Scott is a black American and like most he probably has some white in his ancestry like about a third of white Americans have black in their ancestry.

Obama, as we all know is half white, and if Scot is truly a token, then he would by implication be considered to be more black than Obama.

So, I was obviously being sarcastic, since how black or how white someone is really doesnt matter to most Americans anymore except for the race baiting left who persist in maintaining racial division in this country, culturally, legally and in every way one can imagine, so that they can keep the black community a Democratic Party subsidiary. The absolutely last thing they want to see is a disapearance of racial identity among minorities even though they are in part responsible for the deracination of whites in this country.

But then again, it is the New York Times plopping another leftard editorial to speak for them like putting a ole shit on the porch of someone they dont like. They like running these black racist editorials to incite and provoke the few whites left in the country that have any racial identity at all. If they ever ran a similar editorial by a White nationalist, I would be in shock.

 

[JimBowie1958]

Don't understand why more black Americans aren't disgusted by this.

By the Gateway Plunderit twist, I assume you mean?

As I just pointed out, the original editorial was written by a black American poli-sci professor. I think he's speaking on behalf of black Americans.

Who Gateway Plunderit is speaking on behalf of, that's a whole 'nother smoke.

Who says that this lame-ass proffessor speaks for blacks in this country? Who elected him to that position? No one, obviously, he is just another racist black identity academic making his living trying to make whites maintain their sense of guilt about other whites generations ago owning slaves, while never giving credit to the whole lot more other whites who gave their lives to END SLAVERY.

Of course that doesnt count to thelibtards, and especially not to black race baiters who are so popular with the New York Shits. If it did count they would lose their claim to whotes being guilty as a race, a guilt that they exploit as much as possible. The New York Times editors subscribe to the notion that one cannot be authentically black if one doesnt hate whites and pound on white guilt themes24/7 like they do.

And of course it matters that the New York Bullshit runs that editorial as itmeans that the editors who decided torun it find the opinion expressed there to be within the realm of tolerable opinions. They would never run an equivalent white nationalist editorial because they do not tolerate racial identity among whites.

The New York Times is full of anti-white racists and whites who despise their own race.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

man people need to cancel the slimes rag...
links to article at site

SNIP:
NY Times Welcomes Republican Tim Scott to Senate By Calling Him a “Token”

Posted by Jim Hoft on Wednesday, December 19, 2012, 9:04 AM


The New York Times welcomed Republican Tim Scott to the US Senate by calling him a “token.”

snippet of the times peice at site


Republican Tim Scott is the only African American in the US Senate.
Mediaite reported, via Lucianne:


You have got to hand it to the New York Times’ editors – they’ve got moxy. A Times opinion piece on Tuesday introducing their readers to the newest Senator from the Palmetto State, former Rep. Tim Scott (R-SC), speaks about him – and those with who share his political affiliation and skin color – in the terms you would describe a curious science project. In “The Puzzle of Black Republicans,” the Times summons all the subtlety of the Kool-Aid Man as they smash through the perception that the “paper of record” maintains a single shred of neutrality as they advance the notion that non-Democratic African-Americans are a curiosity to be examined like some newly discovered species of fish.

Of course, it’s OK for liberals to call blacks “tokens” as long as they are Republicans.
Disgusting.

all of it here
NY Times Welcomes Republican Tim Scott to Senate By Calling Him a “Token” | The Gateway Pundit

I wonder does that make obama a token also?

 

[JimBowie1958]

man people need to cancel the slimes rag...
links to article at site

SNIP:
NY Times Welcomes Republican Tim Scott to Senate By Calling Him a “Token”

Posted by Jim Hoft on Wednesday, December 19, 2012, 9:04 AM


The New York Times welcomed Republican Tim Scott to the US Senate by calling him a “token.”

snippet of the times peice at site


Republican Tim Scott is the only African American in the US Senate.
Mediaite reported, via Lucianne:


You have got to hand it to the New York Times’ editors – they’ve got moxy. A Times opinion piece on Tuesday introducing their readers to the newest Senator from the Palmetto State, former Rep. Tim Scott (R-SC), speaks about him – and those with who share his political affiliation and skin color – in the terms you would describe a curious science project. In “The Puzzle of Black Republicans,” the Times summons all the subtlety of the Kool-Aid Man as they smash through the perception that the “paper of record” maintains a single shred of neutrality as they advance the notion that non-Democratic African-Americans are a curiosity to be examined like some newly discovered species of fish.

Of course, it’s OK for liberals to call blacks “tokens” as long as they are Republicans.
Disgusting.

all of it here
NY Times Welcomes Republican Tim Scott to Senate By Calling Him a “Token” | The Gateway Pundit

I wonder does that make obama a token also?

Of course not since Obama is an extreme leftist, while Scott is a conservative, and according to the Loony Leftards, one cannot be *really* black unless one is also a white hating race baiting goofball like Jamie Fox who thinks killing white people is great.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

man people need to cancel the slimes rag...
links to article at site

SNIP:
NY Times Welcomes Republican Tim Scott to Senate By Calling Him a “Token”

Posted by Jim Hoft on Wednesday, December 19, 2012, 9:04 AM


The New York Times welcomed Republican Tim Scott to the US Senate by calling him a “token.”

snippet of the times peice at site


Republican Tim Scott is the only African American in the US Senate.
Mediaite reported, via Lucianne:


You have got to hand it to the New York Times’ editors – they’ve got moxy. A Times opinion piece on Tuesday introducing their readers to the newest Senator from the Palmetto State, former Rep. Tim Scott (R-SC), speaks about him – and those with who share his political affiliation and skin color – in the terms you would describe a curious science project. In “The Puzzle of Black Republicans,” the Times summons all the subtlety of the Kool-Aid Man as they smash through the perception that the “paper of record” maintains a single shred of neutrality as they advance the notion that non-Democratic African-Americans are a curiosity to be examined like some newly discovered species of fish.

Of course, it’s OK for liberals to call blacks “tokens” as long as they are Republicans.
Disgusting.

all of it here
NY Times Welcomes Republican Tim Scott to Senate By Calling Him a “Token” | The Gateway Pundit

I wonder does that make obama a token also?

Of course not since Obama is an extreme leftist, while Scott is a conservative, and according to the Loony Leftards, one cannot be *really* black unless one is also a white hating race baiting goofball like Jamie Fox who thinks killing white people is great.

I had almost forgot about the jamie fox comment. Just another reason to keep my guns.

 

[theDoctorisIn]

I had almost forgot about the jamie fox comment. Just another reason to keep my guns.

Are you afraid that Jamie Foxx is going to come and try to kill you? What exactly do you mean by this?

 

[theDoctorisIn]

I had almost forgot about the jamie fox comment. Just another reason to keep my guns.

Are you afraid that Jamie Foxx is going to come and try to kill you? What exactly do you mean by this?

Kill me? no but someone might take Foxx's word and do it too some innocent unarmed white liberal.
I remember a time when liberals were blaming Sarah Palin for the shooting of Giffords.

Do you honestly think that Jamie Foxx wants to kill white people, or that he's going to "inspire" someone to kill white people?