NY Times Endorses No Republicans for U.S. Congress

Discussion in 'Current Events' started by Stephanie, Nov 5, 2006.

  1. Stephanie
    Offline

    Stephanie Diamond Member Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2004
    Messages:
    70,236
    Thanks Received:
    10,818
    Trophy Points:
    2,040
    Ratings:
    +27,361
    :shocked1: I am shocked I tell ya.......



    Oh yeah, and we are imaging things, when we say the LSM has a liberal bias....:)


    By REUTERS
    Filed at 3:10 p.m. ET

    WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The New York Times, one of the oldest and most respected U.S. newspapers, said on Sunday that for the first time in memory it was endorsing no Republican U.S. congressional candidates this year.

    In an editorial, the Times criticized the Republican-led Congress on matters from tax cuts to energy policy, and charged it has failed to hold President Bush accountable for the unpopular Iraq War.

    ``This election is indeed about George W. Bush -- and the congressional majority's insistence on protecting him from the consequences of his mistakes and misdeeds,'' the Times editorialized.

    The Bush administration has had a number of clashes in recent years with the Times, particularly for the newspaper's disclosure of its warrantless domestic spying program.

    The newspaper, founded in 1851, wrote in its editorial: ``On Tuesday, when this page runs the list of people it has endorsed for election, we will include no Republican congressional candidates for the first time in our memory.''

    ``To begin with, the Republican majority that has run the House of Representatives -- and for the most part, the Senate -- during President Bush's tenure, has done a terrible job on the basics,'' the newspaper wrote.

    ``It's tax-cutting-above-all-else has wrecked the budget, hobbled the middle class and endangered the long-term economy. It has refused to face global warming and done pathetically little about the country's dependence on foreign oil,'' the Times added.
    http://www.nytimes.com/reuters/wash..._r=2&pagewanted=print&oref=slogin&oref=slogin
     
  2. Annie
    Offline

    Annie Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Nov 22, 2003
    Messages:
    50,847
    Thanks Received:
    4,644
    Trophy Points:
    1,790
    Ratings:
    +4,770
    So if any Republicans retain or win seats, that is a repudiation of NY Times? I can live with that! :laugh: Of course, they will agree with the Kerry premise, that they are too 'uneducated.'
     
  3. jillian
    Online

    jillian Princess Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Apr 4, 2006
    Messages:
    69,567
    Thanks Received:
    13,014
    Trophy Points:
    2,220
    Location:
    The Other Side of Paradise
    Ratings:
    +22,441
    So you vote based on what your local newspaper tells you? Funny, I've never voted for anyone based solely on an endorsement.

    Why would the times differ from 2/3 of the country... which doesn't approve of Bush. Most of us wouldn't endorse anyone who is going to continue to rubber stamp and exercise no checks over the admin.
     
  4. Annie
    Offline

    Annie Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Nov 22, 2003
    Messages:
    50,847
    Thanks Received:
    4,644
    Trophy Points:
    1,790
    Ratings:
    +4,770
    Nice spin! :exorcistspinninghead:
     
  5. jillian
    Online

    jillian Princess Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Apr 4, 2006
    Messages:
    69,567
    Thanks Received:
    13,014
    Trophy Points:
    2,220
    Location:
    The Other Side of Paradise
    Ratings:
    +22,441
    As opposed to the BS "liberal media bias" spin.

    How 'bout telling us who the GOP NewsNetwork (oops... I mean Fox) endorsed... :)
     
  6. Annie
    Offline

    Annie Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Nov 22, 2003
    Messages:
    50,847
    Thanks Received:
    4,644
    Trophy Points:
    1,790
    Ratings:
    +4,770
    :laugh: Another good one. FOX didn't endorse any candidates that I can find.
     
  7. Avatar4321
    Offline

    Avatar4321 Diamond Member Gold Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Feb 22, 2004
    Messages:
    70,576
    Thanks Received:
    8,171
    Trophy Points:
    2,070
    Location:
    Minnesota
    Ratings:
    +12,220
    Since when has Congress rubber stamped anything the President wanted? If they were doing that we would have amnesty for millions of illegal immigrants like the President wanted. But we dont. Why? Because contrary to your spin Republicans dont rubber stamp jack.
     
  8. theHawk
    Offline

    theHawk Registered Conservative

    Joined:
    Sep 20, 2005
    Messages:
    10,919
    Thanks Received:
    2,074
    Trophy Points:
    280
    Location:
    Germany
    Ratings:
    +5,807
    I don't approve of Bush. That mean I'm voting for Dems now? :shocked1:
     
  9. Avatar4321
    Offline

    Avatar4321 Diamond Member Gold Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Feb 22, 2004
    Messages:
    70,576
    Thanks Received:
    8,171
    Trophy Points:
    2,070
    Location:
    Minnesota
    Ratings:
    +12,220
    Dont you know? if you dont approve of the President, the media expects you to fully vote out any politician in the House and Senate you might agree with because he or she is GOP. Nevermind that it makes absolutely no sense to vote out the guys that do what you want them to do when President Bush is still in office.
     
  10. theHawk
    Offline

    theHawk Registered Conservative

    Joined:
    Sep 20, 2005
    Messages:
    10,919
    Thanks Received:
    2,074
    Trophy Points:
    280
    Location:
    Germany
    Ratings:
    +5,807

    Sometimes I wish I had the mind of a simpleton just so I can understand such logic. :p:
     

Share This Page