Discussion in 'Law and Justice System' started by Angel Heart, Apr 19, 2008.
Dude kind of sinks his own boat by admitting that had the couple remained together he would have raised the child as his own.
I still disagree with the court's ruling based on a "presumption of consent." That's WHY they have a consent form.
The courts always look to the best interest of the child, and they try to avoid creating bastards. The consent form serves a valid purpose, but it isn't the sole consideration. No judge would condemn an innocent child to life without support over a technicality or negligence in securing the proper paperwork.
The guy helped her create a baby. He can't just walk away.
How, exactly, did he help?
It's in the story.
The story says the guy had a vasectomy, and his wife went without his consent to get inseminated with another mans sperm...Now...How did he create this third child?
Here it is.
The insemination occurred before they split and he was involved in it to a degree. In fact he only became disagreeable when the marriage failed. I guess the Court made the right decision, though I dislike it.
Yep. The guy was a moron.
Separate names with a comma.