Nunes clarifes: No wiretapping evidence

[Ted Frazier]

Embarrassing news for David Nunes today as he is forced to answer "that is correct" to the question of whether there is "still no evidence" that Donald Trump was wiretapped (2:13 into the video)

In an interview with CNN's Jake Tapper, House Intelligence Committee Chairman Devin Nunes clarified that there is still no evidence to support President Trump's wiretap claims and responded to Democrats who are skeptical of his report.

And no, wingnuts, he was not "under surveillance" either, since it were foreign targets who were under surveillance. What a bad month for conservatives in this board.

 

[JakeStarkey]

Nunes is trying to keep himself out of the dock.

 

[depotoo]

What don't you understand in the statement "we won't know the answer to that" and numerous reports lead me to believe that they knew what Trump and his team were doing, some legitimate, others maybe not.

 

[Onyx]

Let me explain incidental collection before the cultists show up. The surveillance was not done on Donald Trump or his associates. It was done on foreign agents, and it was later discovered that these foreign agents were in contact with Trump associates. These conversations were recorded, and this is known as incidental collection.