NSA may be reading your emails

The National Security Agency is facing renewed scrutiny over the extent of its domestic surveillance program, with critics in Congress saying its recent intercepts of the private telephone calls and e-mail messages of Americans are broader than previously acknowledged, current and former officials said.
The agency’s monitoring of domestic e-mail messages, in particular, has posed longstanding legal and logistical difficulties, the officials said.
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/06/17/us/17nsa.html?_r=2&hp

Damn perverts; how dare they.
 
funny-pictures-cat-plots-to-get-cheeseburger.jpg
 
The National Security Agency is facing renewed scrutiny over the extent of its domestic surveillance program, with critics in Congress saying its recent intercepts of the private telephone calls and e-mail messages of Americans are broader than previously acknowledged, current and former officials said.
The agency’s monitoring of domestic e-mail messages, in particular, has posed longstanding legal and logistical difficulties, the officials said.
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/06/17/us/17nsa.html?_r=2&hp

Who cares? Anyone that EVER trusts ANY medium of communication to be free of surveillance is a fool. You can argue the right or wrong of it all you want but even if they swear on a stack of Bibles they don't, I don't trust them.

Simple as that.
 
The National Security Agency is facing renewed scrutiny over the extent of its domestic surveillance program, with critics in Congress saying its recent intercepts of the private telephone calls and e-mail messages of Americans are broader than previously acknowledged, current and former officials said.
The agency’s monitoring of domestic e-mail messages, in particular, has posed longstanding legal and logistical difficulties, the officials said.
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/06/17/us/17nsa.html?_r=2&hp

Who cares? Anyone that EVER trusts ANY medium of communication to be free of surveillance is a fool. You can argue the right or wrong of it all you want but even if they swear on a stack of Bibles they don't, I don't trust them.

Simple as that.


You suppose the sweet nothings whispered in another's ear are also monitored???
 
socialist: (n) - A man with a very small penis. In order to endow himself with more, he will attempt to lop off portions of other mens penises for his own use, and failing that he will just kill the bearer of said larger penis.


The size of your penis is much larger than mine, therefore to ensure equality you must give me an inch of yours that I will use as my own.
 
socialist: (n) - A man with a very small penis. In order to endow himself with more, he will attempt to lop off portions of other mens penises for his own use, and failing that he will just kill the bearer of said larger penis.


The size of your penis is much larger than mine, therefore to ensure equality you must give me an inch of yours that I will use as my own.


First penis transplant reversed after two weeks
Operation successful, but recipient suffered 'severe psychological problem'

updated 12:45 p.m. ET, Tues., Sept . 19, 2006
LONDON - Surgeons in China who said they performed the first successful penis transplant had to remove the donated organ because of the severe psychological problems experienced by the man and his wife.

The case appears to be the first such transplant reported in a medical journal — European Urology, published by the European Association of Urology.

“Because of a severe psychological problem of the recipient and his wife, the transplanted penis regretfully had to be cut off,” Hu said in the report which was published online, without elaborating.

There had been no signs of the 10-centimeter (4-inch) organ being rejected by the recipient’s body. But Hu said more cases and longer observation are needed to determine whether sexual sensation and function can be restored.

“The patient finally decided to give up the treatment because of the wife’s psychological rejection, as well as the swollen shape of the transplanted penis” Hu added.

Fourteen days after the penis transplant, the recipient and his wife requested that the organ be removed “because of the wife’s psychological rejection as well as the swollen shape of the transplanted penis,” the surgeons report in the journal.

Lab examination showed no sign of rejection, the doctors report.

If adequate attention had been paid to the need for counseling and other psychological concerns surrounding the transplant, “the need for penile amputation could probably have been avoided,” Vardi wrote in his commentary.

First penis transplant reversed after two weeks - Men's health- msnbc.com
 
The National Security Agency is facing renewed scrutiny over the extent of its domestic surveillance program, with critics in Congress saying its recent intercepts of the private telephone calls and e-mail messages of Americans are broader than previously acknowledged, current and former officials said.
The agency’s monitoring of domestic e-mail messages, in particular, has posed longstanding legal and logistical difficulties, the officials said.
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/06/17/us/17nsa.html?_r=2&hp

Who cares? Anyone that EVER trusts ANY medium of communication to be free of surveillance is a fool. You can argue the right or wrong of it all you want but even if they swear on a stack of Bibles they don't, I don't trust them.

Simple as that.


You suppose the sweet nothings whispered in another's ear are also monitored???

If someone's THAT bored. :lol:
 
socialist: (n) - A man with a very small penis. In order to endow himself with more, he will attempt to lop off portions of other mens penises for his own use, and failing that he will just kill the bearer of said larger penis.


The size of your penis is much larger than mine, therefore to ensure equality you must give me an inch of yours that I will use as my own.


First penis transplant reversed after two weeks
Operation successful, but recipient suffered 'severe psychological problem'

updated 12:45 p.m. ET, Tues., Sept . 19, 2006
LONDON - Surgeons in China who said they performed the first successful penis transplant had to remove the donated organ because of the severe psychological problems experienced by the man and his wife.

The case appears to be the first such transplant reported in a medical journal — European Urology, published by the European Association of Urology.

“Because of a severe psychological problem of the recipient and his wife, the transplanted penis regretfully had to be cut off,” Hu said in the report which was published online, without elaborating.

There had been no signs of the 10-centimeter (4-inch) organ being rejected by the recipient’s body. But Hu said more cases and longer observation are needed to determine whether sexual sensation and function can be restored.

“The patient finally decided to give up the treatment because of the wife’s psychological rejection, as well as the swollen shape of the transplanted penis” Hu added.

Fourteen days after the penis transplant, the recipient and his wife requested that the organ be removed “because of the wife’s psychological rejection as well as the swollen shape of the transplanted penis,” the surgeons report in the journal.

Lab examination showed no sign of rejection, the doctors report.

If adequate attention had been paid to the need for counseling and other psychological concerns surrounding the transplant, “the need for penile amputation could probably have been avoided,” Vardi wrote in his commentary.

First penis transplant reversed after two weeks - Men's health- msnbc.com

And what guy WOULDN'T have "psychological concerns" having a 4 inch tool? Some "gift." :lol:
 
The problem is not what they know..it is what they are willing to act on. The nsa and the white house knew about Ossama bin Ladens intent on using aircraft to commit acts of terrorism pevious to 9/11 yet failed to act to stop him.
 
The National Security Agency is facing renewed scrutiny over the extent of its domestic surveillance program, with critics in Congress saying its recent intercepts of the private telephone calls and e-mail messages of Americans are broader than previously acknowledged, current and former officials said.
The agency’s monitoring of domestic e-mail messages, in particular, has posed longstanding legal and logistical difficulties, the officials said.
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/06/17/us/17nsa.html?_r=2&hp

Thanks a lot. Now I'm going to feel pressured to make mine more interesting.
 
The problem is not what they know..it is what they are willing to act on. The nsa and the white house knew about Ossama bin Ladens intent on using aircraft to commit acts of terrorism pevious to 9/11 yet failed to act to stop him.

And how would they have done that, sweetie? Ever spent an hour involved in clandestine work?

Does five years as a pilot smuggling drugs in the carribean count?
 
Who cares? Anyone that EVER trusts ANY medium of communication to be free of surveillance is a fool. You can argue the right or wrong of it all you want but even if they swear on a stack of Bibles they don't, I don't trust them.

Simple as that.


You suppose the sweet nothings whispered in another's ear are also monitored???

If someone's THAT bored. :lol:

Just checkin' on the chances of surveillance on that medium of communication..........
 
socialist: (n) - A man with a very small penis. In order to endow himself with more, he will attempt to lop off portions of other mens penises for his own use, and failing that he will just kill the bearer of said larger penis.


The size of your penis is much larger than mine, therefore to ensure equality you must give me an inch of yours that I will use as my own.


First penis transplant reversed after two weeks
Operation successful, but recipient suffered 'severe psychological problem'

updated 12:45 p.m. ET, Tues., Sept . 19, 2006
LONDON - Surgeons in China who said they performed the first successful penis transplant had to remove the donated organ because of the severe psychological problems experienced by the man and his wife.

The case appears to be the first such transplant reported in a medical journal — European Urology, published by the European Association of Urology.

“Because of a severe psychological problem of the recipient and his wife, the transplanted penis regretfully had to be cut off,” Hu said in the report which was published online, without elaborating.

There had been no signs of the 10-centimeter (4-inch) organ being rejected by the recipient’s body. But Hu said more cases and longer observation are needed to determine whether sexual sensation and function can be restored.

“The patient finally decided to give up the treatment because of the wife’s psychological rejection, as well as the swollen shape of the transplanted penis” Hu added.

Fourteen days after the penis transplant, the recipient and his wife requested that the organ be removed “because of the wife’s psychological rejection as well as the swollen shape of the transplanted penis,” the surgeons report in the journal.

Lab examination showed no sign of rejection, the doctors report.

If adequate attention had been paid to the need for counseling and other psychological concerns surrounding the transplant, “the need for penile amputation could probably have been avoided,” Vardi wrote in his commentary.

First penis transplant reversed after two weeks - Men's health- msnbc.com

And what guy WOULDN'T have "psychological concerns" having a 4 inch tool? Some "gift." :lol:


They come bigger? Really?
 

Forum List

Back
Top