Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Please quote where is said that or else STFU.You're limiting the 2nd to adults. Sheesh, it's a very simple concept.Yes, and I agree. I am merely pointing out how you're ok with limits on the 2nd, just like everyone else.Children do have some Constitutional protections as they age, but do not have full Constitutional rights until they become adults.
Limiting the rights of children to own property does not infringe on the 2 nd Amendment. You obviously thought you’d stumbled on a clever argument. It is a shame you were wrong
Apparently not to you since you don't grasp it. You think that putting your kid down for a nap or keeping them from running into traffic is kidnapping
Please quote where I said that or else accept your defeat like a man.Children don't have a 2nd right, so you've limited the scope of the 2nd. C'mon brah, wake up, for fuck's sake.Your concession by lack of a proper response is duly noted.kaz: Only US citizens are entitled to second amendment protections
Taz: Oh, so we can limit gun rights for US citizens!
Yes, you are that stupid. Hillary suggests you ask your husband what to think. Sounds like a good plan in your case
But do keep up your attempts at insults, you're a punk, nothing more.
You really don't understand the difference between recognizing who is a US citizen and restricting Constitutional rights for US citizens, do you? Remarkable.
Seriously, let your husband make your decisions for you like Hillary advised you to do. You voted for her, you know what a smart woman she is
The simpleton who thinks that citizens of the world are entitled to US Constitutional rights. What an arrogant pig you are. You're the ugly American
That's bullshit, if the 2nd doesn't reach children then its limited. plain and simple.You're limiting the 2nd to adults. Sheesh, it's a very simple concept.Yes, and I agree. I am merely pointing out how you're ok with limits on the 2nd, just like everyone else.Children do have some Constitutional protections as they age, but do not have full Constitutional rights until they become adults.
Limiting the rights of children to own property does not infringe on the 2 nd Amendment. You obviously thought you’d stumbled on a clever argument. It is a shame you were wrong
It is, but you don’t seem able to grasp it. It’s not the 2nd that’s limited. It is people who aren’t adults who are limited based on their age.
Your tap dancing is quite good. Unfortunately, you're wrong.That's bullshit, if the 2nd doesn't reach children then its limited. plain and simple.You're limiting the 2nd to adults. Sheesh, it's a very simple concept.Yes, and I agree. I am merely pointing out how you're ok with limits on the 2nd, just like everyone else.
Limiting the rights of children to own property does not infringe on the 2 nd Amendment. You obviously thought you’d stumbled on a clever argument. It is a shame you were wrong
It is, but you don’t seem able to grasp it. It’s not the 2nd that’s limited. It is people who aren’t adults who are limited based on their age.
Your lack of reasoning is sad. The 2nd Amendment is NOT limited by a person’sage. PEOPLE are limited by their age
I never said that children have ALL the Constitutional rights of adults, but they have some. Please stop making shit up. Or else change your fucking Depends.Please quote where is said that or else STFU.You're limiting the 2nd to adults. Sheesh, it's a very simple concept.Yes, and I agree. I am merely pointing out how you're ok with limits on the 2nd, just like everyone else.
Limiting the rights of children to own property does not infringe on the 2 nd Amendment. You obviously thought you’d stumbled on a clever argument. It is a shame you were wrong
Apparently not to you since you don't grasp it. You think that putting your kid down for a nap or keeping them from running into traffic is kidnapping
Your whole argument is that children have Constitutional rights of an adult. Well, kidnapping an adult is a crime, so by your argument that makes kidnapping a child a crime by the 14th amendment.
You think six year olds are Constitutionally entitled to drivers licenses for the same reason. I know you're a leftist and they told you your own standards down apply to you. They lied, your standards do apply to you
I never said any such thing. Accept your defeat like a man, you punk.Please quote where I said that or else accept your defeat like a man.Children don't have a 2nd right, so you've limited the scope of the 2nd. C'mon brah, wake up, for fuck's sake.Your concession by lack of a proper response is duly noted.
But do keep up your attempts at insults, you're a punk, nothing more.
You really don't understand the difference between recognizing who is a US citizen and restricting Constitutional rights for US citizens, do you? Remarkable.
Seriously, let your husband make your decisions for you like Hillary advised you to do. You voted for her, you know what a smart woman she is
The simpleton who thinks that citizens of the world are entitled to US Constitutional rights. What an arrogant pig you are. You're the ugly American
That's your whole argument. You're arguing that people not recognized as full US citizens are entitled to the rights of full S citizens anyway. You think the US government needs to provide freedom of religion to Burmese in Burma, we need to ensure Chinese provide warrants when they go into someone's house and children are entitled to drivers licenses.
You can't have it both ways. We're arguing children are not recognized as full US citizens until they are 18. You don't understand the difference between WHO is a US citizen and limiting the rights of US citizens, which are fundamentally different discussions.
So as long as you won't have an intellectually honest discussion, I'll go with your premise that non-citizens are entitled to Constitutional rights
I never mentioned Russia once. Accept your defeat like a man.That's bullshit, if the 2nd doesn't reach children then its limited. plain and simple.You're limiting the 2nd to adults. Sheesh, it's a very simple concept.Yes, and I agree. I am merely pointing out how you're ok with limits on the 2nd, just like everyone else.
Limiting the rights of children to own property does not infringe on the 2 nd Amendment. You obviously thought you’d stumbled on a clever argument. It is a shame you were wrong
It is, but you don’t seem able to grasp it. It’s not the 2nd that’s limited. It is people who aren’t adults who are limited based on their age.
Right, you think the US government needs to force Russia to provide their citizens with jury trials. You mentioned that
Your tap dancing is quite good. Unfortunately, you're wrong.That's bullshit, if the 2nd doesn't reach children then its limited. plain and simple.You're limiting the 2nd to adults. Sheesh, it's a very simple concept.Limiting the rights of children to own property does not infringe on the 2 nd Amendment. You obviously thought you’d stumbled on a clever argument. It is a shame you were wrong
It is, but you don’t seem able to grasp it. It’s not the 2nd that’s limited. It is people who aren’t adults who are limited based on their age.
Your lack of reasoning is sad. The 2nd Amendment is NOT limited by a person’sage. PEOPLE are limited by their age
You are correct that you are wrong.Your tap dancing is quite good. Unfortunately, you're wrong.That's bullshit, if the 2nd doesn't reach children then its limited. plain and simple.You're limiting the 2nd to adults. Sheesh, it's a very simple concept.
It is, but you don’t seem able to grasp it. It’s not the 2nd that’s limited. It is people who aren’t adults who are limited based on their age.
Your lack of reasoning is sad. The 2nd Amendment is NOT limited by a person’sage. PEOPLE are limited by their age
No,not wrong. What annoys you is that you know I am correct
You are correct that you are wrong.Your tap dancing is quite good. Unfortunately, you're wrong.That's bullshit, if the 2nd doesn't reach children then its limited. plain and simple.It is, but you don’t seem able to grasp it. It’s not the 2nd that’s limited. It is people who aren’t adults who are limited based on their age.
Your lack of reasoning is sad. The 2nd Amendment is NOT limited by a person’sage. PEOPLE are limited by their age
No,not wrong. What annoys you is that you know I am correct
I never said that children have ALL the Constitutional rights of adults, but they have some. Please stop making shit up. Or else change your fucking Depends.Please quote where is said that or else STFU.You're limiting the 2nd to adults. Sheesh, it's a very simple concept.Limiting the rights of children to own property does not infringe on the 2 nd Amendment. You obviously thought you’d stumbled on a clever argument. It is a shame you were wrong
Apparently not to you since you don't grasp it. You think that putting your kid down for a nap or keeping them from running into traffic is kidnapping
Your whole argument is that children have Constitutional rights of an adult. Well, kidnapping an adult is a crime, so by your argument that makes kidnapping a child a crime by the 14th amendment.
You think six year olds are Constitutionally entitled to drivers licenses for the same reason. I know you're a leftist and they told you your own standards down apply to you. They lied, your standards do apply to you
I never said that children have ALL the Constitutional rights of adults, but they have some. Please stop making shit up. Or else change your fucking Depends.Please quote where is said that or else STFU.You're limiting the 2nd to adults. Sheesh, it's a very simple concept.Limiting the rights of children to own property does not infringe on the 2 nd Amendment. You obviously thought you’d stumbled on a clever argument. It is a shame you were wrong
Apparently not to you since you don't grasp it. You think that putting your kid down for a nap or keeping them from running into traffic is kidnapping
Your whole argument is that children have Constitutional rights of an adult. Well, kidnapping an adult is a crime, so by your argument that makes kidnapping a child a crime by the 14th amendment.
You think six year olds are Constitutionally entitled to drivers licenses for the same reason. I know you're a leftist and they told you your own standards down apply to you. They lied, your standards do apply to you
I never said any such thing. Accept your defeat like a man, you punk.Please quote where I said that or else accept your defeat like a man.Children don't have a 2nd right, so you've limited the scope of the 2nd. C'mon brah, wake up, for fuck's sake.You really don't understand the difference between recognizing who is a US citizen and restricting Constitutional rights for US citizens, do you? Remarkable.
Seriously, let your husband make your decisions for you like Hillary advised you to do. You voted for her, you know what a smart woman she is
The simpleton who thinks that citizens of the world are entitled to US Constitutional rights. What an arrogant pig you are. You're the ugly American
That's your whole argument. You're arguing that people not recognized as full US citizens are entitled to the rights of full S citizens anyway. You think the US government needs to provide freedom of religion to Burmese in Burma, we need to ensure Chinese provide warrants when they go into someone's house and children are entitled to drivers licenses.
You can't have it both ways. We're arguing children are not recognized as full US citizens until they are 18. You don't understand the difference between WHO is a US citizen and limiting the rights of US citizens, which are fundamentally different discussions.
So as long as you won't have an intellectually honest discussion, I'll go with your premise that non-citizens are entitled to Constitutional rights
I never mentioned Russia once. Accept your defeat like a man.That's bullshit, if the 2nd doesn't reach children then its limited. plain and simple.You're limiting the 2nd to adults. Sheesh, it's a very simple concept.Limiting the rights of children to own property does not infringe on the 2 nd Amendment. You obviously thought you’d stumbled on a clever argument. It is a shame you were wrong
It is, but you don’t seem able to grasp it. It’s not the 2nd that’s limited. It is people who aren’t adults who are limited based on their age.
Right, you think the US government needs to force Russia to provide their citizens with jury trials. You mentioned that
NRA issues threatening video warning journalists 'your time is running out'
The NRA is becoming a terrorist organization that uses threats and intimidation to achieve their goals. This looks more like an ISIS video than an NRA video. When will journalist begin dying?
The Putin playbook is playing out before our very eyes..
NRA issues threatening video warning journalists 'your time is running out'
The NRA is becoming a terrorist organization that uses threats and intimidation to achieve their goals. This looks more like an ISIS video than an NRA video. When will journalist begin dying?
The Putin playbook is playing out before our very eyes..
Wow. Your desperation runs deep - deeper than usual.NRA issues threatening video warning journalists 'your time is running out'
The NRA is becoming a terrorist organization that uses threats and intimidation to achieve their goals. This looks more like an ISIS video than an NRA video. When will journalist begin dying?
The Putin playbook is playing out before our very eyes..
