NRA endorses Romney, Ryan

[martybegan]

People kill people, guns fling a projectile via explosive combustion out of a handheld metal tube.

My analogy is sound. You propose banning my ownership of guns due to the POSSIBLE actions of other people and myself. If you want to do that, work to overturn the second amenedment.

Please point out where I proposed anything of the sort.

In fact, I'm against gun laws for the same reason I'm against abortion laws... they are probably unenforceable.

I do think a little common sense, like doing a background check on you when you come in to get a new gun, would be a good idea. Or requiring you to take a mandated safety course.

So would using the government's economic pressure to get better behavior out of the gun manufacturers, such as stating that the government will not buy from companies that have irresponsible business practices like selling 100 round clips to the civilian market.

SO why not a background check when you publish a blog post, or a newspaper article? We already have some saying things like that crap youtube movie were the cause of violence, so why not restrict the 1st amendment just as you propose to restrict the 2nd?

Also banning 100 round clips is meaningless, as even when they are used they tend to jam in 10-20 rounds anyway. So ban 10 round clips? Ban reloading when you are already committiing another crime?

 

[copsnrobbers]

Bad clip equates to poorly taught rifleman.

Guns don't kill people.. Crazy people do. Ask Obama he'll fill you in.

 

[hazlnut]

So, he'll be voting for Romney....

 

[JoeB131]

SO why not a background check when you publish a blog post, or a newspaper article? We already have some saying things like that crap youtube movie were the cause of violence, so why not restrict the 1st amendment just as you propose to restrict the 2nd?

Also banning 100 round clips is meaningless, as even when they are used they tend to jam in 10-20 rounds anyway. So ban 10 round clips? Ban reloading when you are already committiing another crime?

Didn't jam on Joker HOlmes when he was mowing down all those people.

Anyway, I hear your logic straining, guy.

No good reason for you to have a gun, period.

 

[Dissent]

He wasn't a criminal so he had every right to buy a weapon and ammo

So you are saying being poor makes people criminals? Well I am dirt poor the worst thing I do is pass on a double yellow once in a while...your logic fails and is the logic of liberals who try to explain why blacks represent an overwhelming amount of violent crimes in America...its because they are poor! OF COURSE! I grew up poor and have never used a weapon in a crime...I have only used a gun to target shoot.

So you are one of these idiots who clings to his guns and his bibles and thinks he's better than the other poor people...

Really.

besides the borderline racism of your statement (Heck, fuck it, you went over the border!)

Fact is, countries with a strong welfare state have lower crime rates than we do.

1. I don't own any guns I own a few knives 2. I am an Atheist but I do believe in the constitution maybe you should read it some time.3. Its not racist to state the truth and that can be backed up with facts,you as most liberals do HATE the truth when its not something you want to fit into your little distopian idea of the world.We have a welfare state and we have in some places low crime rates in some places high crime rates...stop dancing around the answer because you know damn well what it is.

 

[ABikerSailor]

Defend against Tyranny,lets see countries that took their citizens guns away
Hitlers Germany
Communist Russia
Communist Castro..


Do we see a pattern here!? They all led the massacres of the population because they had no weapons to defend themselves.Either way we don't need a damn reason to have a weapon,its in the constitution plain and simple. The founding fathers did not intend the 2nd amendment to be used to shoot game they intended it to be used to shoot tyrants.

Quick question...............can you name ONE law that Obama has enacted that restricts the right to own a gun? There aren't any.

And the fear mongering by the NRA saying that he's gonna wait until his second term to take your guns away is pure bullshit.

 

[Dissent]

None yet. Doesn't mean there won't be any....Obama is dumb but I don't think he is dumb enough to try and take all the guns away from people...it would be a blood bath.Course maybe that's exactly what he wants..

 

[ABikerSailor]

None yet. Doesn't mean there won't be any....Obama is dumb but I don't think he is dumb enough to try and take all the guns away from people...it would be a blood bath.Course maybe that's exactly what he wants..

So there is no evidence that Obama is going to do that, or has done that already.

Then can you explain all the fear mongering going on with the NRA?

 

[Political Junky]

Allen West to NRA group: An armed man is a citizen; a disarmed man is a subject - YouTube


Keep this in mind when you cast your vote.

Quelle surpirse.

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

Unlike conservatives and abortion, liberals have wisely accepted Heller/McDonald as settled law and moved on to other issues.

With liberals no longer taking the ‘gun grabber’ bait, the NRA must work that much harder to keep the rabid right engaged, even if that involves lying.

 

[Dissent]

None yet. Doesn't mean there won't be any....Obama is dumb but I don't think he is dumb enough to try and take all the guns away from people...it would be a blood bath.Course maybe that's exactly what he wants..

So there is no evidence that Obama is going to do that, or has done that already.

Then can you explain all the fear mongering going on with the NRA?

I am not saying it won't happen but the NRA is doing like all people who want money do. They use the fear of something to get more money into their coffers. Its pretty simple. Maybe Obama will try and clamp down. Personally he had a better chance of that happening in his first 2 years but he didn't do anything I am expecting an even closer senate come the election so that means even less chance of something passing.But as we have seen that doesn't stop Obama. He just declares it in an EO.

 

[copsnrobbers]

I don't trust government.. If they try to pull shit they'll have a serious problem on the hands.
Our military will join forces with civilians.

Defend the constitution against all enemies foreign and domestic right!
A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

 

[copsnrobbers]

SO why not a background check when you publish a blog post, or a newspaper article? We already have some saying things like that crap youtube movie were the cause of violence, so why not restrict the 1st amendment just as you propose to restrict the 2nd?

Also banning 100 round clips is meaningless, as even when they are used they tend to jam in 10-20 rounds anyway. So ban 10 round clips? Ban reloading when you are already committiing another crime?

Didn't jam on Joker HOlmes when he was mowing down all those people.

Anyway, I hear your logic straining, guy.

No good reason for you to have a gun, period.

Fuck you.. You should move to Russia. Yeah, Get the fuck outta here.

Negged!

 

[jasonnfree]

Question. If Obama were really out to destroy the country as the right wing says he is, why haven't they risen up against his tyranny by now? It's the only patriotic thing to do. If he wins a second term which will really seal the lid shut on freedom and life in America as we know it, will they then rise up? And of course Wayne La Pierre will fire the first shot I'm sure.

 

[copsnrobbers]

SO why not a background check when you publish a blog post, or a newspaper article? We already have some saying things like that crap youtube movie were the cause of violence, so why not restrict the 1st amendment just as you propose to restrict the 2nd?

Also banning 100 round clips is meaningless, as even when they are used they tend to jam in 10-20 rounds anyway. So ban 10 round clips? Ban reloading when you are already committiing another crime?

Didn't jam on Joker HOlmes when he was mowing down all those people.

Anyway, I hear your logic straining, guy.

No good reason for you to have a gun, period.

Fuck U again Pussy

 

[JoeB131]

SO why not a background check when you publish a blog post, or a newspaper article? We already have some saying things like that crap youtube movie were the cause of violence, so why not restrict the 1st amendment just as you propose to restrict the 2nd?

Also banning 100 round clips is meaningless, as even when they are used they tend to jam in 10-20 rounds anyway. So ban 10 round clips? Ban reloading when you are already committiing another crime?

Didn't jam on Joker HOlmes when he was mowing down all those people.

Anyway, I hear your logic straining, guy.

No good reason for you to have a gun, period.

Fuck U again Pussy

Thanks for proving my point.

Crazy people should be allowed to own guns.

The two reasons gun fetishists give for owning guns are silly.

The first is that they need to protect themselves from all those criminals who want to take their stuff. (Again, European countries don't have guns or many criminals, so go figure. They do have socialism, though, and that's bad, somehow.) Except studies have shown that a gun in the home is 43 times more likely to kill a member of the household than an intruder. Most criminals break in when they think no one is home.

A big dog would be a more effective detterent.


The second one, the even crazier one is that people need their guns to protect themselves from the Government. (Or as they say in Rube-Speak "Gummit") Except the day the "Gummit" comes for your guns, they will have bigger guns, with guys much better trained to use them, and when they do, it will becaue your neighbors asked them to take you out because you were scaring their children.

 

[editec]

And yet the gun control issue isn't really on either candidate's agenda.

Given that one wonders why the NRA would support either candidate.

 

[copsnrobbers]

Didn't jam on Joker HOlmes when he was mowing down all those people.

Anyway, I hear your logic straining, guy.

No good reason for you to have a gun, period.

Fuck U again Pussy

Thanks for proving my point.

Crazy people should be allowed to own guns.

The two reasons gun fetishists give for owning guns are silly.

The first is that they need to protect themselves from all those criminals who want to take their stuff. (Again, European countries don't have guns or many criminals, so go figure. They do have socialism, though, and that's bad, somehow.) Except studies have shown that a gun in the home is 43 times more likely to kill a member of the household than an intruder. Most criminals break in when they think no one is home.

A big dog would be a more effective detterent.


The second one, the even crazier one is that people need their guns to protect themselves from the Government. (Or as they say in Rube-Speak "Gummit") Except the day the "Gummit" comes for your guns, they will have bigger guns, with guys much better trained to use them, and when they do, it will becaue your neighbors asked them to take you out because you were scaring their children.

You're in the dark, wake up Joe.

 

[martybegan]

SO why not a background check when you publish a blog post, or a newspaper article? We already have some saying things like that crap youtube movie were the cause of violence, so why not restrict the 1st amendment just as you propose to restrict the 2nd?

Also banning 100 round clips is meaningless, as even when they are used they tend to jam in 10-20 rounds anyway. So ban 10 round clips? Ban reloading when you are already committiing another crime?

Didn't jam on Joker HOlmes when he was mowing down all those people.

Anyway, I hear your logic straining, guy.

No good reason for you to have a gun, period.

No good reason for me to post on a blog either, or voice my opinion here, but I can, because it is a right we are born with, which is enshrined in the consitution.

And actually his clip supposedly DID jam, which is why he had to switch to the shotgun and his pistols.

 

[martybegan]

Unlike conservatives and abortion, liberals have wisely accepted Heller/McDonald as settled law and moved on to other issues.

With liberals no longer taking the ‘gun grabber’ bait, the NRA must work that much harder to keep the rabid right engaged, even if that involves lying.

Go to NYC, liberals here still think Heller didnt settle anything.

And unlike Roe, the word "arms" is actually in the consitution, and the court is doing what it supposed to, clarifying an already written statement, not as in Roe, where they made up a right based on thier own opinions.