Now we just need to wait for spring for new jobs.

If you can hold out the winter.

What happened to all those new Jobs promised last Summer if Congress would just pass the stimulus bill without reading it?

They got put on hold until next summer, just before the elections, coincidentally. That's all this "story" is about, laying the groundwork for some serious bullshit election claims.
JMO
 
Ya business should just take it up the ass and do nothing to fight onerous regulations and a Boy King that thinks he has the right to tell business and banks what to do.

Well he doesn't. congress does.
I would just as soon not have seen the beginning of the downward slide of America triggerd by greed and such over a 30 yr + period.

Had proper regulations been in place regulating the derivitives and other aspects we would not be in this situation right now. We might not be in wonderful shape but we would be much better of if the markets had been better regulated.

Talk to the Democrats, they opposed new regulations under Bush every time they were brought up. Lead by Barney Frank and Chris Dodd. 3 TIMES it was tried all 3 times it was defeated. Barney Frank was singing the praises of the Housing loan industry just weeks before it collapsed, claiming more regulations would destroy the market.

Seems to me I've read that there were regulations in place but the powers that be didn't bother enforcing them. Correct me if I'm wrong but didn't the Bush Administratioin twice try to put the brakes on Fannie and Freddie and did not the Dems in Congress put the brakes on these investigatins??

There is surely enough blame to go around between the Govt and the banks. Seems that the only entitity that they want to savage is the banks though.
 
White House economists see jobs growth by spring - Yahoo! News

This story is so full of shit as to stink beyond belief. Obama is going to threaten Bankers to make unsound loans for business in the hope of creating jobs that he claimed would be made in the last year already.

He and others are encouraged by less jobs losses then in the past when in fact the job losses have INCREASED since that last rosy picture of , not job growth, but less jobs lost ( due to Christmas seasonal hiring more then likely).


:lol::lol: Isn't lending money to poor credit risks what got us into this mess in the first place?---:lol::lol:

I own my own business & have for the last 30+ years. I am not going to borrow money unless I see a DEMAND for our service. Right now DEMAND is the problem--there is no DEMAND--so there is no need to borrow money for expansion or new employees.

Talk about a bunch of economic illiterate dumb asses---:lol::lol:

Um, yeah, that's the way it normally works. Yet now these Dimocrats are talking about cobbling together a Jobs Bill instead of doing something to really stimulate the economy so businesses can grow and prosper and then naturally expand their production, work forces, etc. Only these dimwits could cook up a plan to hire more workers so you're ready when and if your business gets better. Hoax and change we can definitely live without.
 
Now wait a second....the Obama Stimulus was supposed to create jobs back in June!!! You mean he had ANOTHER failure???!!! Or is job growth just "the last thing to recover" like we are being spoon fed by the MSM...:rofl:

Jobs only became the "last thing to recover...", once Obama's lickspittles in the MSM realized his lofty promises about a million billion new jobs by summer was going to fall just shy of reality.


YOU watch that much MSM?

or is this just another DittoHeadtalkingpoint you memorized?
 
If the pattern of monthy revisions continues, then likely job-growth started in November--Only about 5 months off-target.

Robust job-growth will be different, but may occur before Spring. That will be a net increase exceeding 100,000 jobs per month. By the end of the year, then that could be exceeding 300,000 new jobs every month, which would be mega-healthy.

In an election year, of course: Mainly the GOP doesn't expect that. At GOP, it didn't even make sense for the National Elections of 2008.

The GOP wasn't too friendly to Medicare, Either. Social Security was still a part of the Communist Conspiracy, at RNC, even when the famous General Eisenhower was President. The Reagan Trajectory, "Entrepreneurial Spirt," would change that(?)!

"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!"
(Even Grandfather knew enough to keep his mouth shut, and did not use the baby sister, vision name "Wired Cun. . . ," (Well)! A compassionate silence would have even been useful at Oslo, which is also post-1973. In that year, the older vision-name became outdated! After the non-military fall of the Soviet Bloc, then non-violence, and not the military, actually had won. Evil is like that, in the world. Mostly, humans find non-violent ways to expunge it!)
 
If the pattern of monthy revisions continues, then likely job-growth started in November--Only about 5 months off-target.

Robust job-growth will be different, but may occur before Spring. That will be a net increase exceeding 100,000 jobs per month. By the end of the year, then that could be exceeding 300,000 new jobs every month, which would be mega-healthy.

In an election year, of course: Mainly the GOP doesn't expect that. At GOP, it didn't even make sense for the National Elections of 2008.

The GOP wasn't too friendly to Medicare, Either. Social Security was still a part of the Communist Conspiracy, at RNC, even when the famous General Eisenhower was President. The Reagan Trajectory, "Entrepreneurial Spirt," would change that(?)!

"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!"
(Even Grandfather knew enough to keep his mouth shut, and did not use the baby sister, vision name "Wired Cun. . . ," (Well)! A compassionate silence would have even been useful at Oslo, which is also post-1973. In that year, the older vision-name became outdated! After the non-military fall of the Soviet Bloc, then non-violence, and not the military, actually had won. Evil is like that, in the world. Mostly, humans find non-violent ways to expunge it!)

This does not sound as if they are your own words. If not be so kind as to credit the appropriate source.
 
White House economists see jobs growth by spring - Yahoo! News

This story is so full of shit as to stink beyond belief. Obama is going to threaten Bankers to make unsound loans for business in the hope of creating jobs that he claimed would be made in the last year already.

He and others are encouraged by less jobs losses then in the past when in fact the job losses have INCREASED since that last rosy picture of , not job growth, but less jobs lost ( due to Christmas seasonal hiring more then likely).

You don't have to wait till spring for jobs. Go out and start a company and hire people. Voila!! Jobs!!! Oh, that's right, the economy is in the tank. I guess that sort of shows the limitation of capitalism. It doens't work really well when times get hard.
 
What we need to do is give The UnderEmpolyed 80 acres, a mule, and 6 children chosen at random from every US family living in the suburban/ urban USA, legalize marijuana, and lettem have at it.
 
RetiredGYSGT: Way down at the bottom of the BLS monthly Employment Situation Survey, released this month, there is arithmetic. It is the pattern of Revisions.

"The change in total nonfarm payroll employment for September was revised from
-219,000 to -139,000, and the change for October was revised from -190,000 to
-111,000."

The revisions are showing an increasing trend of about 80,000 jobs per month, in the positive direction. Reversing the report of a negative job-growth likely happened in November, just following the trend. When the trend becomes positive, the super-positive is likely to follow.

What you didn't spend last summer, you may over-spend in spring. People with no income-tax liability, will be getting refunds anyway. That is in addition to the rest of the money.

"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!"
(Great Jewish Rabbi, Jesus Ben Joseph, Son of Mary, Called The Christ: Preached that this might happen(?)! (John 10:10) War is outdated!)
 
Economies are cyclical. Climates are cyclical. Politicans never met a cycle they didn't want to break.
 

Forum List

Back
Top