Now this video is a keeper

[DiveCon]

Because he admitted that both sides lie, as in: you are lying when you claim that the ad was dishonest.

It is as factual as a campaign ad has ever been. You just don't like and perhaps can't handle the truth.

he pointed out that every claim in the video was a LIE you dishonest PoS

No, he didn't. He put forth information that he believes refutes these peoples claims, but, in reality,they don't at all.

yes, he did
by pointing out that it was done by BOTH sides and not just one, it shows the video to be LIES
anyone with an ounce of credibility would admit that
thanks for showing you lack any

 

[loosecannon]

he pointed out that every claim in the video was a lie you dishonest pos

no, he didn't. He put forth information that he believes refutes these peoples claims, but, in reality,they don't at all.

yes, he did
by pointing out that it was done by both sides and not just one, it shows the video to be lies
anyone with an ounce of credibility would admit that
thanks for showing you lack any

liar!

 

[loosecannon]

he pointed out that every claim in the video was a lie you dishonest pos

you lying doesn't make me a dishonest piece of shit, it only proves you as one.

Thanks for playing, sucker!

no, you are the dishonest pos

liar!

 

[DiveCon]

you lying doesn't make me a dishonest piece of shit, it only proves you as one.

Thanks for playing, sucker!

no, you are the dishonest pos

liar!

yes, you are

 

[DiveCon]

no, he didn't. He put forth information that he believes refutes these peoples claims, but, in reality,they don't at all.

yes, he did
by pointing out that it was done by both sides and not just one, it shows the video to be lies
anyone with an ounce of credibility would admit that
thanks for showing you lack any

liar!

is that the best you got, fucktard?

 

[loosecannon]

 

[DiveCon]

yeah, thats you
da winnaz on da interwebz

 

[daveman]

There was not one thing they lied about, except maybe for the bailout, because that was done by both sides. All the bullshit you just listed, while I respect your dedication to your point, is just that... bullshit. YOu see the world in an extremely conservtative way, so you bend all information to make it fit your viewpoint. The same as fundamentalist Muslims and Christians. Whackjobs, the lot of you.

Further, All the points that I want to contend with you on, I won't becuase, it is pointless, because people like you don't listen at all. You have your views, and your %100 correct, so why even waste my energy. Even if I got ALL the information, and spent ALL that time, refuting every single one of your points, you would have more bullshit to say. So, fuck it....

That you even believed that NONE of the points that these people made in these video's has any merit, means that you are in complete denial in order to keep on supporting a defunct ideology, and I can't help you there, until you decide to open your own eyes. In the meantime, I will direct my energy towards better uses, and I will not stop calling out bullshit when I see it.

Ahhh. The ol' "No, YOU!!!!" gambit. Devastating.

 

[daveman]

Because he admitted that both sides lie, as in: you are lying when you claim that the ad was dishonest.

It is as factual as a campaign ad has ever been. You just don't like and perhaps can't handle the truth.

he pointed out that every claim in the video was a LIE you dishonest PoS

No, he didn't. He put forth information that he believes refutes these peoples claims, but, in reality,they don't at all.

It's funny the way you think you get to define reality.

 

[loosecannon]

It's funny the way you think you get to define reality.

yeah funny like a train wreck. The video was absolutely honest, funny how you get to redefine reality to assert otherwise.

Face it, DaveCon, your reality isn't. And the same maxim applies to DiveMan.

 

[DiveCon]

It's funny the way you think you get to define reality.

yeah funny like a train wreck. The video was absolutely honest, funny how you get to redefine reality to assert otherwise.

Face it, DaveCon, your reality isn't. And the same maxim applies to DiveMan.

yet it has been shown the video was totally dishonest, yet YOU want to keep claiming it was pure as the driven snow

 

[loosecannon]

yet it has been shown the video was totally dishonest

BULLSHIT!

You might as well try to argue that the sky is green and grass is purple.

It has been shown that YOU are dishonest! THAT is a fact.

 

[DiveCon]

yet it has been shown the video was totally dishonest

BULLSHIT!

You might as well try to argue that the sky is green and grass is purple.

It has been shown that YOU are dishonest! THAT is a fact.

LOL you are totally delusional

 

[loosecannon]

Lmaoay!!!!

 

[bigrebnc1775]

You're posting facts. That is true. That doesn't make what these people said untrue.

What that those people in the video, couldn't think their way out of a paper bag?

I think you need to edit this, because it really doesn't make any sense.

Maybe it doesn't make sense to you but anyone who has any common sense, they know exactly what Piixie means.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

How was literally any of what these people said a lie? Could you please explain, with examples? Thanks.

0:20 was a lie, who signed NAFTA?-

Following diplomatic negotiations dating back to 1986 among the three nations, the leaders met in San Antonio, Texas, on December 17, 1992, to sign NAFTA. U.S. President George H. W. Bush, Canadian Prime Minister Brian Mulroney and Mexican President Carlos Salinas, each responsible for spearheading and promoting the agreement, ceremonially signed it. The agreement then needed to be ratified by each nation's legislative or parliamentary branch.

In the U.S., Bush, who had worked to "fast track" the signing prior to the end of his term, ran out of time and had to pass the required ratification and signing into law to incoming president Bill Clinton.

North American Free Trade Agreement - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Both sides signed.

Clintons signature is on the paper work, and in the video they are suggesting that only republicans woulkd do this so your point as is theirs FAILED

0:40 Record budget surplus? there wasn't one clinton had the books cooked

Clinton's major contribution was pushing through the 1993 budget bill, which began to reduce what had become a chronic string of federal deficits. Republicans denounced it as the "largest tax increase in history," though in fact it was not a record and also contained some cuts in projected spending. Republican Rep. Newt Gingrich predicted: "The tax increase will kill jobs and lead to a recession, and the recession will force people off of work and onto unemployment and will actually increase the deficit." But just the opposite happened. Fears of inflation waned and interest rates fell, making money cheaper to borrow for homes, cars and investment. What had been a slow economic recovery turned into a roaring boom, bringing in so much unanticipated tax revenue from rising incomes and stock-market gains that the government actually was running record surpluses by the time Clinton left office.
FactCheck.org: Were Clinton's policies responsible for the 1990s' economic growth?

Both sides played a part.


Don't use fact check because there's nothing factual about fact check

0:45 spending money in other nations

He actually said, "I remember the party that spending money on our country is wasted money." I believe hes referring to outsourcing, that is, sending jobs out of country.

Obama’s Global Tax Proposal Up for Senate Vote
Obama Bill: $845 Billion More For Global Poverty; More Of Our Money Going Out Of The County? |Insurance|mortgage|loan|debt relief|finance

Died in congress. Obama had nothing to do with this bill as far as I can tell.

Feds Spent $800,000 of Economic Stimulus on African Genital-Washing Program
Feds Spent $800,000 of Economic Stimulus on African Genital-Washing Program - Topix

Cant find a reliable news source to to discuss this. Cant find much of anything on this actually except what was suggested by CNSnews.com.
Thanks for making my point. and any money used outside America is a waste
0:49 walkl street bailout Democrats were in control of Congress at the time of the bailouts and they control government spending

Bush signed the bill. Both sides played a part.
But congress was run by the Democrats and congress controls the spending
1:15 posions food?
History of the Food and Drug Administration (FDA)

Contamination of our food supply has been a growing concern for the last 5 or 6 years. Who knows why this is.
It's a proven facts democrats care as much as Republicans do. and they only show any signs of caring during an election year

1:30 social issues? EDUCATION? MEDICARE SOCIAL SECURITY? Civil rights and equal pay for women?
Holy shit no one wants to end or destroy any of that

The GOP has a mixed record of supporting the historically popular Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid programs.
Republican Party (United States) - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

There are some politicians who would do away with some of these programs.

Back during the Republican primary, (Sharron) Angle famously said during a debate, "We need to phase Medicare and Social Security out in favor of something privatized,"
Here, There And Back Again: Sharron Angle's Circular Journey On Phasing Out Social Security | TPMDC

Luckily she lost.
privatizing SS and Medicare is not killing it, it's just placing it in the hands of the American citizen. No one wants to kill education, just the department of education bureaucracy
1:45 less money for government means moire money for government has already been proven to work. Besides if the government did not have so many entitlement programs thhey would not need more and more money

What entitlement programs would you cut?
one more time when taxes are lowered the government always takes in more it has been proven to be true. that is my point, and you come up with this shit"What entitlement programs would you cut"

1:51 Every major fincial crsis? 2008 who was in control of congress?

Who was in control during the Great Depression? The S&L crisis?
that is not the point, the point is the democrats were in charge during the fanical crisis of 2008 which is the point they are trying to make everybody forget.
2:00 the screams of the people? Hvae you already forgotten all the marchs and rally that have happen the past two years?

Did they listen? No they didnt. Neither side did and still dont.

Wake up

No you.

Thank you for making my point, do you have anything else that may be useful?

 

[bigrebnc1775]

truth scalds you doesn't it?

Now watch the GOP and the tea partiers immediately cave in on their campaign promises!

Sucker!

what, exactly, was the "truth" in that video?

almost every sentence.

And you're lying

 

[bigrebnc1775]

No you.

uh, you actually made his point for him

Both sides lie. Simple as that, he just doesnt know the facts.

Both sides lie

true but thats not the point of the video. they are trying to make it sound like only reubilcans do it.

Simple as that, he just doesnt know the facts

Still waiting for someone to prove me wrong

 

[bigrebnc1775]

he pointed out that every claim in the video was a LIE you dishonest PoS

No, he didn't. He put forth information that he believes refutes these peoples claims, but, in reality,they don't at all.

yes, he did
by pointing out that it was done by BOTH sides and not just one, it shows the video to be LIES
anyone with an ounce of credibility would admit that
thanks for showing you lack any

Dive Con somehow they are missing the point. I guess they are a lost cause.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

yes, he did
by pointing out that it was done by both sides and not just one, it shows the video to be lies
anyone with an ounce of credibility would admit that
thanks for showing you lack any

liar!

is that the best you got, fucktard?

When a person is grasping for straws that the best he has.