Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
At least its not just me that you are a complete ass to..I read, "Moore will spend the next 6 years claiming he lost the election because of 'lies'- and not go tc" ----
"Go to" -- what? Hell? The Gadsden Mall? The local high school? The haberdashery for something more geographically alert?
If he took them to court, wouldnt that mean they would need to prove their allegations?Moore will never go to court...he cannot prove his innocence..and should thank his lucky stars that some of his accusers don't file their own suits.
Turd pretending to be superior than anyone else.I read, "Moore will spend the next 6 years claiming he lost the election because of 'lies'- and not go tc" ----
"Go to" -- what? Hell? The Gadsden Mall? The local high school? The haberdashery for something more geographically alert?
Hmm..I'm not even close to being a lawyer..but if Moore brings suit..he is the Plaintiff, right? So the burden of proof would be on him. Some of you more legal types could ring in of this..but that is my understanding.If he took them to court, wouldnt that mean they would need to prove their allegations?Moore will never go to court...he cannot prove his innocence..and should thank his lucky stars that some of his accusers don't file their own suits.
This isnt Europe...
IDK maybe im wrong
But wouldnt all he have to do is somehow show their unproven accusations cost him a senate seat?Hmm..I'm not even close to being a lawyer..but if Moore brings suit..he is the Plaintiff, right? So the burden of proof would be on him. Some of you more legal types could ring in of this..but that is my understanding.If he took them to court, wouldnt that mean they would need to prove their allegations?Moore will never go to court...he cannot prove his innocence..and should thank his lucky stars that some of his accusers don't file their own suits.
This isnt Europe...
IDK maybe im wrong
If he took them to court, wouldnt that mean they would need to prove their allegations?Moore will never go to court...he cannot prove his innocence..and should thank his lucky stars that some of his accusers don't file their own suits.
This isnt Europe...
IDK maybe im wrong
But wouldnt all he have to do is somehow show their unproven accusations cost him a senate seat?Hmm..I'm not even close to being a lawyer..but if Moore brings suit..he is the Plaintiff, right? So the burden of proof would be on him. Some of you more legal types could ring in of this..but that is my understanding.If he took them to court, wouldnt that mean they would need to prove their allegations?Moore will never go to court...he cannot prove his innocence..and should thank his lucky stars that some of his accusers don't file their own suits.
This isnt Europe...
IDK maybe im wrong
Im not even close to being one either. But my mom said i should be one the way i can argue. lol
Moore claimed he was going to sue his accusers- well now he can claim an injury- losing the election.
Will Moore actually file suit? Or will Moore just spend the next 6 years accusing his accusers of lying- without going to court?
I read, "Moore will spend the next 6 years claiming he lost the election because of 'lies'- and not go tc" ----
"Go to" -- what? Hell? The Gadsden Mall? The local high school? The haberdashery for something more geographically alert?
If he took them to court, wouldnt that mean they would need to prove their allegations?Moore will never go to court...he cannot prove his innocence..and should thank his lucky stars that some of his accusers don't file their own suits.
This isnt Europe...
IDK maybe im wrong
He should sue every one of them and Gloria Allred too.
Why Don't Politicians Sue for Defamation?If Moore did sue his accusers he would very likely win. Yes, the burden would be on him to prove that he was harmed by the defamatory statements but the standard of proof is slight. It's merely "more likely than not". In the ordinary course of defamatory lawsuits Moore might be barred as a public figure from even bringing the lawsuit in the first place, but, the nature of the statements (child molesting, sexual assault) bumps this up into slander per se and lible per se putting their delicate little middle aged asses right in the courtroom.
One of the most helpful complaints (to him) is that most of these corroborating statements would have to be named and testify. A mall security guard who said "I was instructed to remove Roy Moore from the Gadsen Mall" would have to be named and questioned under oath. Or, the statement itself excluded. All those friends who said "Yes, Sally Mae told me at the time that Roy played with her titties" would have to be identified and questioned under oath with appropriate tests at the details of memory. One by one, the witnesses and hearsay statements would be excluded until the whole shell came down.
This is what brought Dan Rather down. He had a person, a real person, that verified the truth of the statements contained in the fabricated report. When push came to shove, the person refused to be questioned and said he was having nothing more to do with the entire matter.