Not Darwin's Law, it's God's Law.

Here's all those scientists you folks worship:

The scientists claim: All human life began 200,000 years ago in Africa and a woman scientists called Eve.

Where did the American Indian originate?

Scientist #1: From Egypt
Scientist #2: From Mongolia
Scientist #3: From Asia
Scientist #4: From a Pacific Island.

But scientists all know for a fact that all human life originated from Africa's Eve?

Scientists: Yes, all human life originated from Eve in Africa over 200,000 years ago.

But you still can't say for certain from where the American Indian came from?

Science: Well, they all came from Africa's Eve some 200,000 years ago.

Really? But you don't even know from where the American Indian came even much more recently than 200,000 years.

Science: All life began from a single cell.

Really? Even the American Indian?

LOL!!

Most historians agree the people in the Americas migrated from the Asian continent across the Bering Strait. What's fascinating is how all the Native American tribes, and all the Incas, Mayans and Aztecs, were devoutly spiritual people. The cultures changed dramatically from their Asian ancestors, they lived completely different lives, but they all maintained a strong spiritual connection.
Once again, your invented spirit realms and claimed spiritual'ness is of your own new fangled religion of "Bossy's Spirit Realms"

First Americans Lived on Bering Land Bridge for Thousands of Years - Scientific American

But genetic evidence shows there is no direct ancestral link between the people of ancient East Asia and modern Native Americans. A comparison of DNA from 600 modern Native Americans with ancient DNA recovered from a late Stone Age human skeleton from Mal'ta near Lake Baikal in southern Siberia shows that Native Americans diverged genetically from their Asian ancestors around 25,000 years ago, just as the last ice age was reaching its peak.

Once again, your invented spirit realms and claimed spiritual'ness is of your own new fangled religion of blah blah blah...

Whenever I have reduced my opponent to such mindless juvenile babble, it serves as confirmation to me that you're done, the argument is over, you have nothing else of value to offer. I know trolls often like to use this tactic, thinking it somehow causes annoyance and frustration, but for me it's quite the contrary.

As for where the native people of the Americas came from, I am not an expert. I merely stated that many historians believe they came from Asia across the Bering Strait. Your article does not dispute or refute that theory, in fact, it supports it.

So you've confirmed you have nothing but trollish memes to retort and you've also verified my statement about where the natives of America came from. Well done!
That was quite the waffle, Bossy. Maybe if honesty was a part of your new fangled religion of Bossy's Spirit Realms you could induce a few
people to convert.

Did you forget that you wrote earlier: "Most historians agree the people in the Americas..."

Yet, when I corrected you, you did a Michael Jackson Moonwalk shuffle with the revised: "I merely stated that many historians believe..."

From "most" to "many"?

Really, Bossy. You are your own opponent. You're losing your argument to yourself.
 
Pierre Pual Grasse:

""science" does not accept a
credo or should not, yet the implicit credo
contained in that position is a credo that
God does not exist or if He does, that one
is not permitted to acknowledge His
existence in scientific thought."

""science" is unable to
solve this problem of the origin of
"intelligence," and yet says that
determining that origin is not a "false
problem."

"Perhaps in this area biology can go no farther: the
rest is metaphysics."

"To insist ... that life appeared quite by chance and
evolved in this fashion is an unfounded supposition which I
believe to be wrong and not in accordance with the facts." As
far as origins are concerned, Grassé appears to believe in a
Creator.

"There are numerous
references to gaps in the paleontological record. For example,
in discussing "Chronological Order Of Appearance" of
Chordata, he says: "Accurately naming the group of
invertebrates from which the phylum Chordata arises is
another matter. Some zoologists hold that the metamerism of
prospective mesodermal structures and the relationship of the
excretory system and the gonads with the mesodermal
cavities (coelom) relate vertebrates to annelids. These
conclusions are no doubt very impressive but they do not
bridge the immense gap between polychaete annelids and
Amphioxus. How many missing links are there between the
two of them? Nobody can tell. We find it unnecessary to survey
the other hypotheses put forward by phylogenists; they are not
satisfactory since they are not based on any paleontological
data."
 
Pierre Pual Grasse:

""science" does not accept a
credo or should not, yet the implicit credo
contained in that position is a credo that
God does not exist or if He does, that one
is not permitted to acknowledge His
existence in scientific thought."

""science" is unable to
solve this problem of the origin of
"intelligence," and yet says that
determining that origin is not a "false
problem."

"Perhaps in this area biology can go no farther: the
rest is metaphysics."

"To insist ... that life appeared quite by chance and
evolved in this fashion is an unfounded supposition which I
believe to be wrong and not in accordance with the facts." As
far as origins are concerned, Grassé appears to believe in a
Creator.

"There are numerous
references to gaps in the paleontological record. For example,
in discussing "Chronological Order Of Appearance" of
Chordata, he says: "Accurately naming the group of
invertebrates from which the phylum Chordata arises is
another matter. Some zoologists hold that the metamerism of
prospective mesodermal structures and the relationship of the
excretory system and the gonads with the mesodermal
cavities (coelom) relate vertebrates to annelids. These
conclusions are no doubt very impressive but they do not
bridge the immense gap between polychaete annelids and
Amphioxus. How many missing links are there between the
two of them? Nobody can tell. We find it unnecessary to survey
the other hypotheses put forward by phylogenists; they are not
satisfactory since they are not based on any paleontological
data."
Cutting and pasting falsified "quotes" from your creation ministries makes you an accomplice to fraud.

It's just a shame that you fundie cranks are the most dishonest people on the planet.

Cretinism or Evilution? No. 3
E.T. Babinski
Out of Context Quotatations of French Scientists

Cretinism or Evilution Out of Context Quotatations of French Scientists


It's a typical pattern of fundie cranks to dump "quotes", unattributed and out of context, because the source if your nonsense is so easily exposed as fraud.

Are you really going to be an accomplice to the fraud that is the ICR?
 
Last edited:
Pierre Pual Grasse:

""science" does not accept a
credo or should not, yet the implicit credo
contained in that position is a credo that
God does not exist or if He does, that one
is not permitted to acknowledge His
existence in scientific thought."

""science" is unable to
solve this problem of the origin of
"intelligence," and yet says that
determining that origin is not a "false
problem."

"Perhaps in this area biology can go no farther: the
rest is metaphysics."

"To insist ... that life appeared quite by chance and
evolved in this fashion is an unfounded supposition which I
believe to be wrong and not in accordance with the facts." As
far as origins are concerned, Grassé appears to believe in a
Creator.

"There are numerous
references to gaps in the paleontological record. For example,
in discussing "Chronological Order Of Appearance" of
Chordata, he says: "Accurately naming the group of
invertebrates from which the phylum Chordata arises is
another matter. Some zoologists hold that the metamerism of
prospective mesodermal structures and the relationship of the
excretory system and the gonads with the mesodermal
cavities (coelom) relate vertebrates to annelids. These
conclusions are no doubt very impressive but they do not
bridge the immense gap between polychaete annelids and
Amphioxus. How many missing links are there between the
two of them? Nobody can tell. We find it unnecessary to survey
the other hypotheses put forward by phylogenists; they are not
satisfactory since they are not based on any paleontological
data."
Cutting and pasting falsified "quotes" from your creation ministries makes you an accomplice to fraud.

It's just a shame that you fundie cranks are the most dishonest people on the planet.

Cretinism or Evilution? No. 3
E.T. Babinski
Out of Context Quotatations of French Scientists

Cretinism or Evilution Out of Context Quotatations of French Scientists


It's a typical pattern of fundie cranks to dump "quotes", unattributed and out of context, because the source if your nonsense is so easily exposed as fraud.

Are you really going to be an accomplice to the fraud that is the ICR?

Funny. It came straight from the book he wrote.
 
Pierre Pual Grasse:

""science" does not accept a
credo or should not, yet the implicit credo
contained in that position is a credo that
God does not exist or if He does, that one
is not permitted to acknowledge His
existence in scientific thought."

""science" is unable to
solve this problem of the origin of
"intelligence," and yet says that
determining that origin is not a "false
problem."

"Perhaps in this area biology can go no farther: the
rest is metaphysics."

"To insist ... that life appeared quite by chance and
evolved in this fashion is an unfounded supposition which I
believe to be wrong and not in accordance with the facts." As
far as origins are concerned, Grassé appears to believe in a
Creator.

"There are numerous
references to gaps in the paleontological record. For example,
in discussing "Chronological Order Of Appearance" of
Chordata, he says: "Accurately naming the group of
invertebrates from which the phylum Chordata arises is
another matter. Some zoologists hold that the metamerism of
prospective mesodermal structures and the relationship of the
excretory system and the gonads with the mesodermal
cavities (coelom) relate vertebrates to annelids. These
conclusions are no doubt very impressive but they do not
bridge the immense gap between polychaete annelids and
Amphioxus. How many missing links are there between the
two of them? Nobody can tell. We find it unnecessary to survey
the other hypotheses put forward by phylogenists; they are not
satisfactory since they are not based on any paleontological
data."
Cutting and pasting falsified "quotes" from your creation ministries makes you an accomplice to fraud.

It's just a shame that you fundie cranks are the most dishonest people on the planet.

Cretinism or Evilution? No. 3
E.T. Babinski
Out of Context Quotatations of French Scientists

Cretinism or Evilution Out of Context Quotatations of French Scientists


It's a typical pattern of fundie cranks to dump "quotes", unattributed and out of context, because the source if your nonsense is so easily exposed as fraud.

Are you really going to be an accomplice to the fraud that is the ICR?

Funny. It came straight from the book he wrote.

Funny. It came straight from the ICR website.
 

Forum List

Back
Top