Not all Expertise is Equal

[westwall]

The Warmers have admitted publicly that AGW is a religion!
-------------------------------------------------------------------------

NO they haven't. Tenet can be used in a non-religious sense, so your analysis is pure BS.

YES they have! Tenet is used OVERWHELMINGLY AS A RELIGIOUS TERM!

 

[Old Rocks]

Geological Society of America.

The Geological Society of America - Position Statement on Global Climate Change

Position Statement
Decades of scientific research have shown that climate can change from both natural and anthropogenic causes. The Geological Society of America (GSA) concurs with assessments by the National Academies of Science (2005), the National Research Council (2006), and the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC, 2007) that global climate has warmed and that human activities (mainly greenhouse‐gas emissions) account for most of the warming since the middle 1900s. If current trends continue, the projected increase in global temperature by the end of the twentyfirst century will result in large impacts on humans and other species. Addressing the challenges posed by climate change will require a combination of adaptation to the changes that are likely to occur and global reductions of CO2 emissions from anthropogenic sources.

 

[Old Rocks]

American Meteorlogical Society


http://www.ametsoc.org/policy/2007climatechange.html
Why is climate changing?
Climate has changed throughout geological history, for many natural reasons such as changes in the sun’s energy received by Earth arising from slow orbital changes, or changes in the sun’s energy reaching Earth’s surface due to volcanic eruptions. In recent decades, humans have increasingly affected local, regional, and global climate by altering the flows of radiative energy and water through the Earth system (resulting in changes in temperature, winds, rainfall, etc.), which comprises the atmosphere, land surface, vegetation, ocean, land ice, and sea ice. Indeed, strong observational evidence and results from modeling studies indicate that, at least over the last 50 years, human activities are a major contributor to climate change.

Direct human impact is through changes in the concentration of certain trace gases such as carbon dioxide, chlorofluorocarbons, methane, nitrous oxide, ozone, and water vapor, known collectively as greenhouse gases. Enhanced greenhouse gases have little effect on the incoming energy of the sun, but they act as a blanket to reduce the outgoing infrared radiation emitted by Earth and its atmosphere; the surface and atmosphere therefore warm so as to increase the outgoing energy until the outgoing and incoming flows of energy are equal. Carbon dioxide accounts for about half of the human-induced greenhouse gas contribution to warming since the late 1800s, with increases in the other greenhouse gases accounting for the rest; changes in solar output may have provided an augmentation to warming in the first half of the 20th century.

Carbon dioxide concentration is rising mostly as a result of fossil-fuel burning and partly from clearing of vegetation; about 50% of the enhanced emissions remain in the atmosphere, while the rest of the Earth system continues to absorb the remaining 50%. In the last 50 years atmospheric CO2 concentration has been increasing at a rate much faster than any rates observed in the geological record of the past several thousand years. Global annual-mean surface temperatures are rising at a rapid rate to values higher than at any time in the last 400 (and probably in the last 1000) years. Once introduced in the atmosphere, carbon dioxide remains for at least a few hundred years and implies a lengthy guarantee of sustained future warming. Further, increases in greenhouse gases are nearly certain to produce continued increases in temperature. Such changes in temperature lead to changes in clouds, pressure, winds, and rainfall in a complex sequence of further effects.

 

[Old Rocks]

American Geophysical Union

AOL Search

Human Impacts on Climate

The Earth's climate is now clearly out of balance and is warming. Many components of the climate system—including the temperatures of the atmosphere, land and ocean, the extent of sea ice and mountain glaciers, the sea level, the distribution of precipitation, and the length of seasons—are now changing at rates and in patterns that are not natural and are best explained by the increased atmospheric abundances of greenhouse gases and aerosols generated by human activity during the 20th century. Global average surface temperatures increased on average by about 0.6°C over the period 1956–2006. As of 2006, eleven of the previous twelve years were warmer than any others since 1850. The observed rapid retreat of Arctic sea ice is expected to continue and lead to the disappearance of summertime ice within this century. Evidence from most oceans and all continents except Antarctica shows warming attributable to human activities. Recent changes in many physical and biological systems are linked with this regional climate change. A sustained research effort, involving many AGU members and summarized in the 2007 assessments of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, continues to improve our scientific understanding of the climate.

During recent millennia of relatively stable climate, civilization became established and populations have grown rapidly. In the next 50 years, even the lower limit of impending climate change—an additional global mean warming of 1°C above the last decade—is far beyond the range of climate variability experienced during the past thousand years and poses global problems in planning for and adapting to it. Warming greater than 2°C above 19th century levels is projected to be disruptive, reducing global agricultural productivity, causing widespread loss of biodiversity, and—if sustained over centuries—melting much of the Greenland ice sheet with ensuing rise in sea level of several meters. If this 2°C warming is to be avoided, then our net annual emissions of CO2 must be reduced by more than 50 percent within this century. With such projections, there are many sources of scientific uncertainty, but none are known that could make the impact of climate change inconsequential. Given the uncertainty in climate projections, there can be surprises that may cause more dramatic disruptions than anticipated from the most probable model projections.

 

[gslack]

LOL oldsocks and socko come in after the thread is dead for days and try to post propaganda to fix it.... HAHHAHAHAHAHHAHAHA!

 

[westwall]

Pretty typical isn't it. Whatever happened to old trolling blunder, finally exposed as a old fraud clone? I allways looked at them as old fraud=old fraud but trolling blunder=old fraud off his meds.

 

[Oddball]

He's in the penalty box.

That's all I got to say about that.

 

[gslack]

Ed the trollingblunder cynic.....

 

[Old Rocks]

LOL. But incapable of a real reply.

Come on, dear little idiot children, a scientific society that states that AGW is not real. Just one, surely you can manage that? After all, I have given you many, many societies that state that AGW is a fact, and a clear and present danger. You say there is no consensus, so where are the dissenting societies?

 

[gslack]

LOL. But incapable of a real reply.

Come on, dear little idiot children, a scientific society that states that AGW is not real. Just one, surely you can manage that? After all, I have given you many, many societies that state that AGW is a fact, and a clear and present danger. You say there is no consensus, so where are the dissenting societies?

Blah BLah Blah....

Same old tired bullshit PR from you so why bother?

You aren't converting anyone even retards know not to buy it now.. And we have people like you who post without reading or understanding what you post to thank for it...

I for one applaud you oldoscks... FOr your tireless efforts to bring the ignorance of AGW theory to light, and for your endless array of propaganda which does so much to prove what utter nonsense AGW is...

Take a bow man.... LOL

 

[westwall]

LOL. But incapable of a real reply.

Come on, dear little idiot children, a scientific society that states that AGW is not real. Just one, surely you can manage that? After all, I have given you many, many societies that state that AGW is a fact, and a clear and present danger. You say there is no consensus, so where are the dissenting societies?

Name one anti AGW group period! There is no coherent group trying to promulgate the anti religion. Now riddle me this batman....show me one AGW group that is NOT recieving MILLIONS of our dollars to do their "research".

I dare ya!