North polar ice cap at record low

[Peach]

After a period of rapid ice loss through the first half of June, sea ice extent is now slightly below 2010 levels, the previous record low at this time of year. Sea level pressure patterns have been favorable for the retreat of sea ice for much of the past month.

On June 18, the five-day average sea ice extent was 10.62 million square kilometers (4.10 million square miles). This was 31,000 square kilometers (12,000 square miles) below the same day in 2010, the record low for the day and 824,000 square kilometers (318,000 square miles) below the same day in 2007, the year of record low September extent.

Arctic Sea Ice News and Analysis

PSSST! Also a 180 mile "hot zone" off the Atlantic coast, helping TS stay alive, just a coincidence I am positive.

 

[Old Rocks]

Snow melts in summer!

Holy fucking moly!

You lost, Frank.

Just admit it and move on.

He has won massively over your fully brainwashed ignorance on display style of posting.

Getting BACK to one of CF's points:

Please tell us what MAN CAUSED GLOBAL materials caused the Laurentide Ice Sheet and the Cordilleran Ice Sheet to withdraw.

Was it a LOT of shoveling?

Was it campfires?

Was it all those SUV's?

What?

Ever hear of Milankovic Cycles?

 

[Old Rocks]

Liability -

You aren't terribly good at science, are you?

If the world experiences a sudden rise in global temperatures at the same time as an intense season of solar acitivity, it may be the solar acitivity that causes it.

When the world experiences a sudden ruse in global temperatures with no correlating pattern of solar activity - it is probably something else.

Sayonara:

It appears that I am far better at science and logic than you are.

IF something has happened in the past BEFORE humanity COULD have caused it (because we were basically a bunch of cavemen at the time), then if it happens AGAIN today, that doesn't mean that WE ARE the cause this time (either).

If YOU (in your ponderous and unclear manner) are trying to grunt out that we COULD be the cause, this time, ok. Maybe. But the thing is, then, it's up to you to demonstrate it.

And if you are attempting to claim (implicitly or otherwise) that science "knows" that it was solar radiation that caused the ice melts associated with past glaciation, then back up your shit. Because you are full of shit.

No, you are not good at science in any way.

http://www.eoearth.org/files/120401_120500/120458/620px-MilankovitchCycles.jpg

Milankovitch Tutorial

How we have caused in the increase in temperatures during the last 150 years.

The Carbon Dioxide Greenhouse Effect

For current information from real scientists published in peer reviewed journals

AGW Observer

 

[Saigon]

It appears that I am far better at science and logic than you are.

.

Really?

Then how do you explain what is happening to the poles, and which major scientific bodies have accepted this explanation?

 

[skookerasbil]

Geez the k00ks are getting schooled on this thread. In their world, common sense does not apply. To them, all weather related anomolies started only in 1850. There was no flooding before 1850. No tsunami's. No heat waves. No tornado outbreaks. No Cat 5 hurricanes............none of that occurred before 1850 s0ns. Who cant see that????

 

[Saigon]

Geez the k00ks are getting schooled on this thread. In their world, common sense does not apply. To them, all weather related anomolies started only in 1850. There was no flooding before 1850. No tsunami's. No heat waves. No tornado outbreaks. No Cat 5 hurricanes............none of that occurred before 1850 s0ns. Who cant see that????

Don't be absurd.

Everyone understands that climate is constantly in a state of flux, and that there have been oth ice ages and warm periods during the past houndreds of thousands of years.

In all seirousness, your inability to read and write is such that you will never understand what these threads are about, anyway.