Norquist to WaPo on Bush II tax-cuts

Dot Com

Nullius in verba
Feb 15, 2011
52,842
7,881
1,830
Fairfax, NoVA
Looks as though Norquist threw a life-line to the foundering House repubs seeing as their intransigence was untenable & would bring the Teapublicans down in '12. It goes w/o saying that most Teapublicans signed his pledge.
Out from under the anti-tax pledge - The Washington Post
In other words, according to Mr. Norquist’s interpretation of the Americans for Tax Reform pledge, lawmakers have the technical leeway to bring in as much as $4 trillion in new tax revenue — the cost of extending President George W. Bush’s tax cuts for another decade — without being accused of breaking their promise. “Not continuing a tax cut is not technically a tax increase,” Mr. Norquist told us. So it doesn’t violate the pledge? “We wouldn’t hold it that way,” he said.
:clap2:
 
Last edited:
GN doesn't want to kill his cash cow, Americans for Tax Reform, to do so would mean he would have to work for a living. He's smart enough to know if we default he will be blamed. As the leader of the radical Republicans whose ideological purity casued our economic crisis he, GN, speaks now to deflect blame when shit hits the fan.
 
That guy is bad news. Never liked him for his over-the-top, anti-Washington rhetoric & I've been closely following Washington goings-on for 20 years.
 
Is he saying he mis-spoke now? :rolleyes:

Ann Telnaes - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Ann Carolyn Telnaes (born 1960 in Stockholm, Sweden) is a editorial cartoonist. Unlike many editorial cartoonists, Telnaes does not draw for any one set newspaper, and her cartoons are instead syndicated across the United States. In 2001, she became the second woman cartoonist to win the Pulitzer Prize for editorial cartooning.[1] She studied with the Character Animation program at California Institute of the Arts

Ann Telnaes: Political Animations from Ann Telnaes - The Washington Post
 
Looks like norquist put it out there, to give Boehner & Cantnor cover because of their untenable position. now he's back-pedaling to make it look like a mis-speak :doubt: Cats already outta the bag Grover lol He caved :clap2:
 
Looks like norquist put it out there, to give Boehner & Cantnor cover because of their untenable position. now he's back-pedaling to make it look like a mis-speak :doubt: Cats already outta the bag Grover lol He caved :clap2:
The budget is the dimwits fault. The house passed a bill and sent it to the senate but reid and the idiot dimwits failed it. Lets see them and obamaturd come up with their own plan instead of twiddleing their thumbs and blaming the republicans when they actually try to do something. The dimwits are do nothing twits, and any one who agrees with them also!!!!
 
Norquist is running the country now?

Fucking great.

Well, he has immense influence over many Republicans.

Clinton also said Grover Norquist, who as president of Americans for Tax Reform is the GOP’s unofficial enforcer of no-new-taxes pledges, has a “chilling” hold on the nation’s lawmaking.

The former president said it has seemed like Republicans need any revenue concessions need to be “approved in advance by Grover Norquist.”

“You’re laughing,” he told the crowd of 800. “But he was quoted in the paper the other day saying he gave Republican senators PERMISSION … on getting rid of the ethanol subsidies. I thought, ‘My GOD, what has this country come to when one person has to give you permission to do what’s best for the country.’ It was chilling.”
 
Looks as though Norquist threw a life-line to the foundering House repubs seeing as their intransigence was untenable & would bring the Teapublicans down in '12. It goes w/o saying that most Teapublicans signed his pledge.
Out from under the anti-tax pledge - The Washington Post
In other words, according to Mr. Norquist’s interpretation of the Americans for Tax Reform pledge, lawmakers have the technical leeway to bring in as much as $4 trillion in new tax revenue — the cost of extending President George W. Bush’s tax cuts for another decade — without being accused of breaking their promise. “Not continuing a tax cut is not technically a tax increase,” Mr. Norquist told us. So it doesn’t violate the pledge? “We wouldn’t hold it that way,” he said.
:clap2:

Sure...........he then backpedaled and changed his position in less than 24 hours.

It's no longer acceptable to let the tax cuts expire according to Norquist.
 
I thought the Republicans were suppose to be representatives of the people who voted them in. Not Grover Norquist's lackeys.
 
I thought the Republicans were suppose to be representatives of the people who voted them in. Not Grover Norquist's lackeys.

Speaking of which, Grover Norquist wants to reduce government to the level where he can drown it in a bathtub (his words).

Now, if Norquist wants to get rid of the government, doesn't that make him a traitor?

And.........if various congress critters are swearing allegiance to him instead of the Constitution, doesn't that make them traitors as well?
 

Forum List

Back
Top