Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
We did not have the Russians down, and every president and secretary of state all know better than you, thereisnospoon.
Really? Ok what were those images of Russian soldiers going AWOL because they were not being paid. And those crumbling airfields., the dilapidated military buildings, the horribly in need of repair facilities, the inability of the Russian government to maintain it's fighter planes?.....Of the inability of the Russian law enforcement to control organized crime, the public housing falling apart, an economy in shambles, no recognizable products coming from the country.
The fact post Soviet Russia was in a shambles. The country was losing population due to emigration and low birth rates. We did that. We beat the shit out of our most dangerous adversary without firing a single shot.
And now we have people like you wanting to kiss their ass.
What's next, you gonna start waving the Russian flag on May 1st?
I wonder why more don't call jake on his bullshit. every thread he seems to be an authority on the subject, he gives his opinion as fact with no supporting information.
Really? Ok what were those images of Russian soldiers going AWOL because they were not being paid. And those crumbling airfields., the dilapidated military buildings, the horribly in need of repair facilities, the inability of the Russian government to maintain it's fighter planes?.....Of the inability of the Russian law enforcement to control organized crime, the public housing falling apart, an economy in shambles, no recognizable products coming from the country.
The fact post Soviet Russia was in a shambles. The country was losing population due to emigration and low birth rates. We did that. We beat the shit out of our most dangerous adversary without firing a single shot.
And now we have people like you wanting to kiss their ass.
What's next, you gonna start waving the Russian flag on May 1st?
I wonder why more don't call jake on his bullshit. every thread he seems to be an authority on the subject, he gives his opinion as fact with no supporting information.
You guys makes statements with no backing at all, the fact has been provided above that all living former secretaries of state and presidents supported the signing of start, and you guys are acting as "an authority". I am pointing out the fact of the situation and you guys are mouthing unrealities.
Your question is irrelevant to the OP.
The secretaries and presidents, to your shock I know, do know more than you about this issue.
uh, i'm not a libGenius.....The Russians have been spending their oil and gas revenues very wisely. The country has been rebuilding their military.
Oh, are you aware that START prohibits the US from building anti- nuke missile defense systems in NATO countries in Europe?....Yeah, why is it that the Russians oppose building anti-missile defense systems? Because it scares the crap out of them. It scares the crap out of them because THEY CAN'T BUILD ONE!!!!!!
So they use this idiotic treaty to wreck our strategic advantage, you dummy!
Why the fuck are you libs so willing to be chummy with the God Damned Russians in the first place? Do you think the Russian missile knows your home houses people who are in favor of START?
and this bomb requires a cargo plane or the old Tu-22 Tupolev to deliver it
that is a 50+ year old airframe
this can NOT be placed onto a missile as it is TOO HEAVY
if you run around fearing everything, you will not have anything in your life but fear
post went to incorrect user. Sorry.
Oh it is not fear. It is this......We had the Russians on the ropes. And amazingly our political relations with Russia had greatly improved. Notice the tensions between Russia and The US even since Obama was elected?. That is because Putin is in charge, doesn't like the US and looks upon Obama as weak. When you view your adversary as weak, you take advantage of that weakness.
Back to the diplomatic relations we had with Russia before Putin, wonderful...Why after some 40 years of Cold War were we more friendly with Russia then ever? One, keep your friends close, your enemies closer. Two, when your adversary is weak, keep him weak but make him think he's happy.
I cannot believe there are people in this country who are so naive as to think the Russians with their current people in power are going to honor any treaty honorably.
Vladimir Putin surrounds himself with people who were of the Old Soviet Union's inner workings. These are former KGB and former military people who hold the same distrust and avarice toward the US as they always did. In fact there is no doubt in my mind that Putin and Co. may possibly resent the US for helping in the breakup the USSR!!!
Your question is irrelevant to the OP.
The secretaries and presidents, to your shock I know, do know more than you about this issue.
How many times have you used a source to support your opinion? My question is relevant to show that you are full of shit
Really? Ok what were those images of Russian soldiers going AWOL because they were not being paid. And those crumbling airfields., the dilapidated military buildings, the horribly in need of repair facilities, the inability of the Russian government to maintain it's fighter planes?.....Of the inability of the Russian law enforcement to control organized crime, the public housing falling apart, an economy in shambles, no recognizable products coming from the country.
The fact post Soviet Russia was in a shambles. The country was losing population due to emigration and low birth rates. We did that. We beat the shit out of our most dangerous adversary without firing a single shot.
And now we have people like you wanting to kiss their ass.
What's next, you gonna start waving the Russian flag on May 1st?
I wonder why more don't call jake on his bullshit. every thread he seems to be an authority on the subject, he gives his opinion as fact with no supporting information.
You guys makes statements with no backing at all, the fact has been provided above that all living former secretaries of state and presidents supported the signing of start, and you guys are acting as "an authority". I am pointing out the fact of the situation and you guys are mouthing unrealities.
Your question is irrelevant to the OP.
The secretaries and presidents, to your shock I know, do know more than you about this issue.
How many times have you used a source to support your opinion? My question is relevant to show that you are full of shit
Your question offers nothing of relevance to the OP. All the authorities know better than you do, bigreb, as shocking as that seems to you. If you are trying to make this about who is better at this, you or me, you lost before you ever became a member of the Board.
uh, i'm not a libGenius.....The Russians have been spending their oil and gas revenues very wisely. The country has been rebuilding their military.
Oh, are you aware that START prohibits the US from building anti- nuke missile defense systems in NATO countries in Europe?....Yeah, why is it that the Russians oppose building anti-missile defense systems? Because it scares the crap out of them. It scares the crap out of them because THEY CAN'T BUILD ONE!!!!!!
So they use this idiotic treaty to wreck our strategic advantage, you dummy!
Why the fuck are you libs so willing to be chummy with the God Damned Russians in the first place? Do you think the Russian missile knows your home houses people who are in favor of START?
and this bomb requires a cargo plane or the old Tu-22 Tupolev to deliver it
that is a 50+ year old airframe
this can NOT be placed onto a missile as it is TOO HEAVY
if you run around fearing everything, you will not have anything in your life but fear
post went to incorrect user. Sorry.
Oh it is not fear. It is this......We had the Russians on the ropes. And amazingly our political relations with Russia had greatly improved. Notice the tensions between Russia and The US even since Obama was elected?. That is because Putin is in charge, doesn't like the US and looks upon Obama as weak. When you view your adversary as weak, you take advantage of that weakness.
Back to the diplomatic relations we had with Russia before Putin, wonderful...Why after some 40 years of Cold War were we more friendly with Russia then ever? One, keep your friends close, your enemies closer. Two, when your adversary is weak, keep him weak but make him think he's happy.
I cannot believe there are people in this country who are so naive as to think the Russians with their current people in power are going to honor any treaty honorably.
Vladimir Putin surrounds himself with people who were of the Old Soviet Union's inner workings. These are former KGB and former military people who hold the same distrust and avarice toward the US as they always did. In fact there is no doubt in my mind that Putin and Co. may possibly resent the US for helping in the breakup the USSR!!!
How many times have you used a source to support your opinion? My question is relevant to show that you are full of shit
Your question offers nothing of relevance to the OP. All the authorities know better than you do, bigreb, as shocking as that seems to you. If you are trying to make this about who is better at this, you or me, you lost before you ever became a member of the Board.
yoiur opinion of my question to you is irrelevant the only way you will get a pass on this is show how many post you make that you give an opinion on and also give a source to support your opinion. That is the only relevant issue here between you and me. nothing else will do. back it up or remain a bitch pawned pussy.
Your question offers nothing of relevance to the OP. All the authorities know better than you do, bigreb, as shocking as that seems to you. If you are trying to make this about who is better at this, you or me, you lost before you ever became a member of the Board.
yoiur opinion of my question to you is irrelevant the only way you will get a pass on this is show how many post you make that you give an opinion on and also give a source to support your opinion. That is the only relevant issue here between you and me. nothing else will do. back it up or remain a bitch pawned pussy.
No pass from you is required for any of us.
I will question your assertions, I will demand your evidence, and you will not get a pass on this.
Very good junior you used a source nowNow that is a claim of yours, bigreb. As long as you don't give evidence for it, the claim is yours and it applies to nobody else, only the claimant. Now if you want to turn your claim into an informed assertion, then give evidence for it. Then someone can post evidence that clearly refutes the OP. For instance,
"Why New START deserves GOP support" By Henry A. Kissinger, George P. Shultz, James A. Baker III, Lawrence S. Eagleburger and Colin L. Powell Thursday, December 2, 2010 Why New START deserves GOP support
Very good junior you used a source nowNow that is a claim of yours, bigreb. As long as you don't give evidence for it, the claim is yours and it applies to nobody else, only the claimant. Now if you want to turn your claim into an informed assertion, then give evidence for it. Then someone can post evidence that clearly refutes the OP. For instance,
"Why New START deserves GOP support" By Henry A. Kissinger, George P. Shultz, James A. Baker III, Lawrence S. Eagleburger and Colin L. Powell Thursday, December 2, 2010 Why New START deserves GOP support
do you have any proof (threads or posts where you used a link) that you use a source when you insert your opinion? If you do use a source I am sure you can share it I am sure you have it readily avaible.
Very good junior you used a source nowNow that is a claim of yours, bigreb. As long as you don't give evidence for it, the claim is yours and it applies to nobody else, only the claimant. Now if you want to turn your claim into an informed assertion, then give evidence for it. Then someone can post evidence that clearly refutes the OP. For instance,
"Why New START deserves GOP support" By Henry A. Kissinger, George P. Shultz, James A. Baker III, Lawrence S. Eagleburger and Colin L. Powell Thursday, December 2, 2010 Why New START deserves GOP support
do you have any proof (threads or posts where you used a link) that you use a source when you insert your opinion? If you do use a source I am sure you can share it I am sure you have it readily avaible.
Very good junior you used a source nowNow that is a claim of yours, bigreb. As long as you don't give evidence for it, the claim is yours and it applies to nobody else, only the claimant. Now if you want to turn your claim into an informed assertion, then give evidence for it. Then someone can post evidence that clearly refutes the OP. For instance,
"Why New START deserves GOP support" By Henry A. Kissinger, George P. Shultz, James A. Baker III, Lawrence S. Eagleburger and Colin L. Powell Thursday, December 2, 2010 Why New START deserves GOP support
do you have any proof (threads or posts where you used a link) that you use a source when you insert your opinion? If you do use a source I am sure you can share it I am sure you have it readily avaible.
<snip> because jake has no link just an opinionated post and has no merit to the discussion
You have been properly schooled, bigreb, so let's end the thread: the OP is fail, and let's move on.
