‘No sugarcoating’ as first movie on ’67 battle for Jerusalem takes shape

[Sally]

This might be a movie that many here would enjoy seeing. We will have to keep an eye out for it in the future.

‘No sugarcoating’ as first movie on ’67 battle for Jerusalem takes shape

‘We’re not making this for the Fox News crowd,’ say US producers. But ‘there’s a great story here, and we’re hoping this can start a more informed dialogue’

BY JORDAN HOFFMAN June 9, 2014, 11:44 pm

They weren’t yet born, but Joseph Schick and Jacob Septimus remember 1967.

“It was a story I grew up with, and reading about it after being shocked about the Holocaust, it was like the perfect underdog tale” says Septimus, a director, producer and former advertising creative director working to get a new feature film, “Jerusalem ’67,” off the ground.

Joseph Schick, a lawyer and sportswriter now launching a producing career, is more blunt. “This is a story that has never been shown on film. Even the documentary footage is more about the south – everyone thought the action was going to be in Egypt. Our film will be about the people and the city of Jerusalem.”

Read more:

'No sugarcoating' as first movie on '67 battle for Jerusalem takes shape | The Times of Israel

 

[Mr. H.]

One in the hand is worth Jew in the bush.

Jews are just people. You got that?

Nothing special. Just peeps.

Get off your Jew rocker already.

Damn you make me puke.

 

[Mr. H.]

Hey, look at me.

I'm a Jew.

Yo- Jew over here.

Get the fucking out.

You think you got some shit over everyone else?

Haughty princesses.

 

[Mr. H.]

What's up with this Jew shit anyway?

Superior Jew. Oh high and mighty Jew.

If you ain't Jew... you ain't shit.

JEW be gone.

 

[Mr. H.]

How about Sally take a bath in some non-Jew.

 

[TheOldSchool]

One day the Jews and Palestinians will bring peace to the Holy Land.

 

[TheOldSchool]

Lol jk

 

[Mr. H.]

If not for the 1967 Jew my family would have have starved.

Go, 1967 Jew, go.

 

[TheOldSchool]

If not for the 1967 Jew my family would have have starved.

Go, 1967 Jew, go.

The handheld calculator was invented in 1967. It must've been the iPhone of the 60's.

 

[Snouter]

There is definitely nothing "holy" about any location in the middle east. But as far as the zionist terroristic, pre-emptive attacks against the native folks in the region, I wonder if the docudrama will show prisoners slaughtered. There is a theory that the zionists tried to sink the USS Liberty to hide the atrocities they were committing.

 

[proudveteran06]

One in the hand is worth Jew in the bush.

Jews are just people. You got that?

Nothing special. Just peeps.

Get off your Jew rocker already.

Damn you make me puke.

Don't like it? This is the I/P Board, You Moron. Still don't like it? Get the FUCK off !

 

[Jroc]

One in the hand is worth Jew in the bush.

Jews are just people. You got that?

Nothing special. Just peeps.

Get off your Jew rocker already.

Damn you make me puke.

Don't like it? This is the I/P Board, You Moron. Still don't like it? Get the FUCK off !

He's drunk again

 

[I.P.Freely]

If it does not have the great warrior Uzi Narkiss in it, then its sugar coated.

 

[aris2chat]

This might be a movie that many here would enjoy seeing. We will have to keep an eye out for it in the future.

‘No sugarcoating’ as first movie on ’67 battle for Jerusalem takes shape

‘We’re not making this for the Fox News crowd,’ say US producers. But ‘there’s a great story here, and we’re hoping this can start a more informed dialogue’

BY JORDAN HOFFMAN June 9, 2014, 11:44 pm

They weren’t yet born, but Joseph Schick and Jacob Septimus remember 1967.

“It was a story I grew up with, and reading about it after being shocked about the Holocaust, it was like the perfect underdog tale” says Septimus, a director, producer and former advertising creative director working to get a new feature film, “Jerusalem ’67,” off the ground.

Joseph Schick, a lawyer and sportswriter now launching a producing career, is more blunt. “This is a story that has never been shown on film. Even the documentary footage is more about the south – everyone thought the action was going to be in Egypt. Our film will be about the people and the city of Jerusalem.”

Read more:

'No sugarcoating' as first movie on '67 battle for Jerusalem takes shape | The Times of Israel

Jerusalem 67 - A Dramatic Motion Picture

 

[teddyearp]

Can't wait to see it . . . . .

Don't understand all the hate, but again, I see that flames are freely thrown here.

 

[Politico]

It's just Jew hating. If the movie is unbiased and tells the story go for it.

 

[proudveteran06]

What's up with this Jew shit anyway?

Superior Jew. Oh high and mighty Jew.

If you ain't Jew... you ain't shit.

JEW be gone.

At least you know you're SHIT ! The truth will set you free. You were born SHIT, live like SHIT and will die like SHIT.

 

[aris2chat]

It's just Jew hating. If the movie is unbiased and tells the story go for it.

No conflict in the region can emerge with a halo. There is good and bad on both sides.
A factual story should show why the characters act/respond the way they do. The desperation and fears they go through.
Some acts might be heroic and changes the momentum, but there will always be victims on one side or the other. there will always be blood on people's hands.
The conflicts going on are not a clean orderly board game with rules to follow. Rules on the ground are condition. On the streets thing are not as clear cut as in a court room or general assembly. Not every act can be slapped war crime. War itself is a crime but some in the region are becoming powerful or rich, so violence is a business and not about the vanish any time soon.