No-one was hurt in the "Watergate" scandal

Reagan got 241 Americans killed in Beirut, Bush got over 4000 Americans killed in Iraq.

Since they both resigned, that is why Obama should now resign over 4 tragic deaths in Libya??

Go away.
 
Last edited:
From 'Fast & Furious' to this awful debacle, Obama & Holder's scandals have killed people. It's shocking observing Obamabots ignoring or even defending such heinous acts.
 
Reagan got 241 killed in Beirut, Bush got over 4000 Americans killed in Iraq.

Since they both resigned, that is why Obama should now resign over 4 tragic deaths in Libya??

Go away.

Reagan didn't cover it up or blame a American for it cause they used their 1st amendment right.... Go back under the rock your crawled from. This President has shown more then once he doesn't care if Americans die for his politics.
 
Reagan got 241 killed in Beirut, Bush got over 4000 Americans killed in Iraq.

Since they both resigned, that is why Obama should now resign over 4 tragic deaths in Libya??

Go away.

Who said he should resign? I'll settle for Obama telling the truth about it.......:thup:
 
driveby the mo fohevahmoh mo clown gives nothing but his opinion, which is fine.

WG was far, far worse in the course of our history than Benghazi as terrible as it was.

The rise of the Tea Party rivals the evil of WG as true evils in American history.
 
Reagan got 241 killed in Beirut, Bush got over 4000 Americans killed in Iraq.

Since they both resigned, that is why Obama should now resign over 4 tragic deaths in Libya??

Go away.

Reagan didn't cover it up or blame a American for it cause they used their 1st amendment right.... Go back under the rock your crawled from. This President has shown more then once he doesn't care if Americans die for his politics.

Reagan's incompetence that got 241 Americans killed is excusable? Bush's fake WMD scam that got 4000+ Americans killed is excusable?

But Obama must resign because the 'nuts on the Right have manufactured a false narrative about the event that demonizes the President,

and the President is supposed to bow to the will of rightwing propaganda?

Doesn't that mean that the President should have resigned long ago when the 'nuts on the Right decided he wasn't born in America?

Who decided that the rightwing propaganda machine should be the unassailable arbiter of truth and falsehood in this country?
 
The more the truth comes out the more I have realized just how corrupt the Media as well as the BHO admin is
If GWB had done this there is no doubt the media would be 7-24s on this

The media includes the conservative media. When did it demand that Bush resign because of Iraq?
 
Reagan got 241 killed in Beirut, Bush got over 4000 Americans killed in Iraq.

Since they both resigned, that is why Obama should now resign over 4 tragic deaths in Libya??

Go away.

Who said he should resign? I'll settle for Obama telling the truth about it.......:thup:

The OP implied he should resign based on the (comical) analogy he made.

The next poster said Obama should be impeached for this.

Should Reagan have been impeached for the disaster in Beirut...

...60 times worse in terms of loss of life

??? Eh??
 
Democraps do worse than Watergate today with open lies about GOP nominees, spying on them and their families, rummaging through their trash to steal credit information, etc.

Obamination and his goons are guilty of crimes in Libya and Fast & Furious, the comparisons aren't even close.

If George Bush bombed Libya, sent our Ambassador there within a year without proper security then got him killed....the media would break down the doors of the White House. Pelosi and Reid would hold non-stop sessions in Congress until Bush resigned, etc.

This all shows the scum we are dealing with in this country.
 
Democraps do worse than Watergate today with open lies about GOP nominees, spying on them and their families, rummaging through their trash to steal credit information, etc.

Obamination and his goons are guilty of crimes in Libya and Fast & Furious, the comparisons aren't even close.

If George Bush bombed Libya, sent our Ambassador there within a year without proper security then got him killed....the media would break down the doors of the White House. Pelosi and Reid would hold non-stop sessions in Congress until Bush resigned, etc.

This all shows the scum we are dealing with in this country.

The rightwing nuts on this forum have started about a hundred threads about Benghazi in the last month, every one of them a hysterical condemnation of the President and/or his administration.

How many do you suppose these same people would have started if Bush were president, and the same thing happened?

I'm guessing 'zero'. Am I close? You think?
 
Dumbfuck....if Bush did what Obamination in Libya he would have some in the GOP calling for his head.

Watergate is a joke compared to this crap and Fast & Furious.

in Fast & Furious Obamination had a secret plan of undermining the 2nd Amendment by showing guns are a problem in the US and Mexico.

In Libya he soldout to the radical muslims ignoring their threats against our people before and after the attack, even making excuses for their evil on some fucking video all to keep his lie about terrorists giving up after UBL true in his dark mind.

Watergate had nothing to do with Americans at large, whereas Libya and Fast & Furious are major issues for the American public. One a possible plan to violate the "right to bear arms" and the other our foreign strategy to fight terrorism. Fucking tapes on political rivals is a joke compared to that.

You and Obamination are nothing but scum.

Democraps do worse than Watergate today with open lies about GOP nominees, spying on them and their families, rummaging through their trash to steal credit information, etc.

Obamination and his goons are guilty of crimes in Libya and Fast & Furious, the comparisons aren't even close.

If George Bush bombed Libya, sent our Ambassador there within a year without proper security then got him killed....the media would break down the doors of the White House. Pelosi and Reid would hold non-stop sessions in Congress until Bush resigned, etc.

This all shows the scum we are dealing with in this country.

The rightwing nuts on this forum have started about a hundred threads about Benghazi in the last month, every one of them a hysterical condemnation of the President and/or his administration.

How many do you suppose these same people would have started if Bush were president, and the same thing happened?

I'm guessing 'zero'. Am I close? You think?
 
Last edited:
The media forced Nixon to resign. Imagine a secret informant that may or may not have been giving accurate information and who's identity was not revealed for 30 years until he was dead and couldn't answer questions. "Deep Throat" might have been fiction for all we know.That's the extent to which the media hated Nixon. Who could get away with that stuff today? It's just the opposite for Obama. The media circled the wagons around Hussein and avoids asking the administration tough questions. Anybody who tries to get to the bottom of the tragic example of incompetence is either attacked or ignored.
 
Look we have to make priorities and choices in this country," said Chaffetz. "We have ... 15,0000 contractors in Iraq. We have more than 6,000 contractors, a private army, there, for President Obama, in Baghdad. And we’re talking about, can we get two dozen or so people into Libya to help protect our forces? When you’re in tough economic times, you have to make difficult choices. You have to prioritize things.

Chaffetz defends voting to cut funds for embassy security - Video

Republican Congress Cut Diplomatic Security Funding Before Benghazi Attacks; Mitt Romney Attempts to Profit Politically From Death Of Navy Seal

It would seem the conclusions are quite obvious. As with the Republican wreckage of the US economy, it appears Republicans have again created a problem for which they are now attempting to blame the Obama Administration. This political profiteering is even more heinous due to the fact that they were warned that their cuts to diplomatic security may be harmful. But they decided to ignore those warnings. Now, after numerous incidents at US diplomatic missions where additional security may have helped, Republicans attempt to blame the Obama administration for a situation they helped make worse. Not only is this disingenuous. It is rank underhandedness and betrayal. The Republicans should both be ashamed of their witch hunt and of their past efforts to cut US diplomatic security during a time of danger.

“I don’t trust Romney. He shouldn’t make my son’s death part of his political agenda,” Barbara Doherty said in a statement broadcast Wednesday on WHDH-TV in Boston. “It’s wrong to use these brave young men, who wanted freedom for all, to degrade Obama.”

---------------------------------------------

Republicans have a lot of 'splainin' to do.

We had security that could have responded, saved their lives & killed the enemy. Money was not the problem. Soldiers were ordered by the Obama administration to stand down!

Democrats always try to blame lack of funds. You losers are so pathetic.

[youtube]G0sA4P2CPgQ[/youtube]
 
Last edited:
One, the deep throat informant was the No 2 in the FBI.

Two, RMN knew it was true.

Three, the GOP senators told RMN "to get the fuck out and take" the Berzerks with him.

The dead marines in Lebanon and the WG were a thousand times worse than Benghazi.
The media forced Nixon to resign. Imagine a secret informant that may or may not have been giving accurate information and who's identity was not revealed for 30 years until he was dead and couldn't answer questions. "Deep Throat" might have been fiction for all we know.That's the extent to which the media hated Nixon. Who could get away with that stuff today? It's just the opposite for Obama. The media circled the wagons around Hussein and avoids asking the administration tough questions. Anybody who tries to get to the bottom of the tragic example of incompetence is either attacked or ignored.
 
Better start the impeachment hearing then, Thanks for stating so clearly the purpose behind the Libya "outrage".

Voters favor Romney by 2-to-1 for trusting him to be able to fix the economy.

Looks like the ballot box will get rid of the stench for us.

Maybe, maybe not, but it should not matter to a discussion on Libya. It will still be there next year and I am not even sure Romney could find it on a map.

No one is swallowing the liberal propaganda that Romney is stupid. In fact, increasingly voters are coming to believe that Obama is stupid.
 
Watergate was the defining constitutional moment of the last half century.

Benghazi was an intelligence failure with four dead.

Defending Obama again?

Why do you think anyone is supposed to believe you're a Republican, Fakey?
 
That is not the definition of "signficance" between the two, mo clown. Four deaths are terrible. What Nixon was trying to do was subvert the Constitution, which could have led to a police state and possibly the deaths of thousands.

"Subvert the Constitution" my ass. Obama has already subverted 100 times worse than Nixon ever imagined doing.
 
Our GOP senators, no left wing dolts, you mo moron forevahmoh moron, in WG put Nixon down as they would put down your nonsense here, driveby.

All you proved is that Democrat Senators have no scruples of any kind. If Nixon had been a Democrat, they would have defended him to the last man.
 

Forum List

Back
Top