No More Entitled to Tax Deductions Than Food Stamps

Discussion in 'Politics' started by BakshisMouse, Jun 12, 2012.

  1. BakshisMouse
    Offline

    BakshisMouse BANNED

    Joined:
    Jun 28, 2011
    Messages:
    702
    Thanks Received:
    69
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Ratings:
    +69
    First, let’s look at the Constitution:

    From Article I, Section 8

    Clause 1: The Congress shall have Power To lay and collect Taxes, Duties, Imposts and Excises, to pay the Debts and provide for the common Defence and general Welfare of the United States; but all Duties, Imposts and Excises shall be uniform throughout the United States;
    Clause 2: To borrow Money on the credit of the United States;


    And for a good measure, Amendment XVI:
    The Congress shall have power to lay and collect taxes on incomes, from whatever source derived, without apportionment among the several States, and without regard to any census or enumeration.

    By the way, amendments are just as binding as the original document written in 1787. In fact, if amendments that are correctly enacted contradict the original document, the amendments take precedence.

    Just by looking at these details, I can reasonably conclude that the Food Stamp Program is in no way in violation of this Constitution, even if the spending on them causes budget deficits. And Amendment XVI makes it very clear that the government can tax income. The government probably could still tax income even without the amendment, just because of Article I, Section 8, Clause 1. (If I'm wrong, sue me.)

    What is the point of my pointing this out if most educated people would have known this already?

    My point is that all of you comfy, chuffed, upper middle class arrogant dumbshits who complain so much about entitlement programs and taxes and yet trumpet the Constitution as the greatest wisdom ever written by men have no more of a Constitutional claim to your taxed income than a welfare queen has to her food stamps! "Welfare" is in the constitution multiple times; "Capitalism" a big fat zero!

    :rofl:

    Yes, there are limits. If Congress enacted a 100% tax on all income, while this might be a shitty idea, it would not be a Constitutional or legal issue! You would just vote those assholes out of office when the time came!

    If you think I’m being crude or harsh, or that my generalizations are unfair, just look at your favorite radio host, Rush Limbaugh. You reap what you sow, hypocrites!
     
  2. SniperFire
    Offline

    SniperFire Senior Member

    Joined:
    Feb 28, 2012
    Messages:
    13,627
    Thanks Received:
    1,219
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    Inside Your Head
    Ratings:
    +1,223
    I am guessing you didn't know that Liberals changed the meaning of the word 'welfare' to be a noun after the Constitution was written, did you?
     
  3. BakshisMouse
    Offline

    BakshisMouse BANNED

    Joined:
    Jun 28, 2011
    Messages:
    702
    Thanks Received:
    69
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Ratings:
    +69
    I'm guessing you don't know what the fuck you're talking about.

    But whatcha gonna do?

    :dunno:
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
  4. BakshisMouse
    Offline

    BakshisMouse BANNED

    Joined:
    Jun 28, 2011
    Messages:
    702
    Thanks Received:
    69
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Ratings:
    +69
    I'm not saying the meaning of the word "welfare" hasn't changed. In the past 250 years. I'm saying it doesn't mean shit.

    source
     
  5. SniperFire
    Offline

    SniperFire Senior Member

    Joined:
    Feb 28, 2012
    Messages:
    13,627
    Thanks Received:
    1,219
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    Inside Your Head
    Ratings:
    +1,223
    But I am curious. Who told you that you were entitled to the other guy's stuff?
     
  6. BakshisMouse
    Offline

    BakshisMouse BANNED

    Joined:
    Jun 28, 2011
    Messages:
    702
    Thanks Received:
    69
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Ratings:
    +69
    No one is actually entitled to anything from the Federal Government, as per the current Constitution.

    You're not even entitled to your untaxed income!

    That is my fucking point!
     
  7. SniperFire
    Offline

    SniperFire Senior Member

    Joined:
    Feb 28, 2012
    Messages:
    13,627
    Thanks Received:
    1,219
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    Inside Your Head
    Ratings:
    +1,223
    Then again, you are just some retard posting on a message board.
     
  8. LogikAndReazon
    Offline

    LogikAndReazon Gold Member

    Joined:
    Feb 21, 2012
    Messages:
    4,850
    Thanks Received:
    614
    Trophy Points:
    190
    Ratings:
    +1,285
    "Promote" the general welfare...............

    This surely means that clueless bureaucrats should steal from one person and give to another so that he/she can enjoy public education, free university, food stamps, unlimited unemployment, childcare, civil servant benefits, universal healthcare and govt subsidized retirement ..........

    Those are certain constitutional gurantees, no doubt about it...............lol
     
  9. BakshisMouse
    Offline

    BakshisMouse BANNED

    Joined:
    Jun 28, 2011
    Messages:
    702
    Thanks Received:
    69
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Ratings:
    +69
    ^^^^
    Is that so? Make that two of us here.
     
  10. Katzndogz
    Offline

    Katzndogz Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2011
    Messages:
    65,659
    Thanks Received:
    7,418
    Trophy Points:
    1,830
    Ratings:
    +8,337
    When did Promote the General Welfare of the United States become send LaTasha a check every month?
     

Share This Page