No More Bullsh. . . .Well(?)

Discussion in 'Economy' started by mascale, May 3, 2009.

  1. mascale
    Offline

    mascale VIP Member

    Joined:
    Feb 22, 2009
    Messages:
    4,035
    Thanks Received:
    210
    Trophy Points:
    85
    Ratings:
    +453
    Quakers are actually the founders of the Pennsylvania Colony, of which mascale has origins. Philadelphia itself, is in fact a founding location. It's in "The Federalist Papers."

    The Concept "Black," and the concept "Populist," are rarely associated in modern political dialogue. There is, for example, the federal birthday calendar problem: Wherein anyone has to guess whether or not a black can be thought a religious leader.

    By 1890, with the GOP firmly entrenched in federal electoral history, the end of black populism was also, clearly, itself, already history.

    So what actually would eventually come about?

    "1. Abolition of property in land and applications of all rents of land to public purposes.
    2. A heavy progressive or graduated income tax.
    3. Abolition of all right of inheritance.
    4. Confiscation of the property of all emigrants and rebels.
    5. Centralization of credit in the hands of the state, by means of a national bank with state capital and an exclusive monopoly.
    6. Centralization of the means of communication.
    7. Extension of factories and instruments of production owned by the state. . . .
    8. Equal obligation of all to work. Establishment of industrial armies, especially for agriculture.
    9. Combination of agriculture with manufacturing industries. . . .
    10. Free education for children in public schools. Abolition of child factory labor in its present form. . . . "
    (Karl Marx, With Engels, contemporary of Abraham Lincoln, founding force of the other party, who jailed the political opposition, shuttered the opposition press, suspended habeus corpus, and declared Martial Law to be some sort of norm, "The Communist Manifesto: 1849)

    Notice that in proposing the graduated income tax, that Marx and Engels--at least--knew about math and income scales.

    Anarchists, by comparison, rarely propose a concept of Widespread Wealth Worldwide in any agenda, or in any concept. What the Three Weird Guys did was to actually propose, and even take over, the Central Government to advance certain aims, and in the shared method of "Oppression Is Job One."

    Anyone can go through the various agenda, and notice that history is on the move. . . .again. Opposition to Wage enslavement, and slavery opposition, are not entirely in the agenda, like always.

    The banking and industry take-overs, however: Seem to be moving along nicely, and under the auspices of the Ivy League educated. The Ivy League, of course, is the main source of any "Populist" Working Class, in the United States.

    The Ivy League, and The GOP, and now the West Wing: Have no concept of Widespread Wealth Worldwide, on any plate, on any table.

    We do have a vegetable garden, an outdoor playpen, possibly awaiting the arrival of a Chrysler, or a Fiat, to be parked nearby. No doubt the West Wing sheets have been converted from hoods into window coverings--Anyone might think, unless they have not.

    "Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!"
    (Curious that nations actually intended to blow one another to bits, failing to understand the basic laws of Freedom,--Of the Party of Abraham Lincoln, admired of the "New" West Wing!)

    aka, "So It's Racist! So What?!" (aka, the widely now admired, Ronald Reagan "Trajectory," in case no one has noticed upwards of 50% minority unemployment rates!")
     
    Last edited: May 4, 2009

Share This Page