I have asked today and on other days before. Since the Gitmo detainees that will be tried in open Federal Court had no basic Federally guaranteed rights how does one try them in court? NO Miranda rights. No right to a Lawyer before being interrogated No Lawyer to argue for bail No Lawyer at all No right to a speedy trial. Held with no basic criminal court rights at all. THEN Holder, the Attorney General announces that even if the defendents are found not guilty or released because of all the violations they will be rearrested by the Military and held for Military Tribunals. In other words NO presumption of Innocence at all, they are presumed guilty and if the Court disagrees it will be ignored. How is this Justice? How is this even LEGAL. Military Tribunals are legal because of long history and because the Supreme Court has ruled in these cases they can be used. Holder is going to ( with Obama's permission ) VIOLATE FEDERAL LAW and he is the SENIOR Legal advisor in the Country. Explain how you can support this knowing all this?