No Liberal will answer this.

Discussion in 'Law and Justice System' started by RetiredGySgt, Jan 7, 2010.

  1. RetiredGySgt
    Online

    RetiredGySgt Platinum Member

    Joined:
    May 6, 2007
    Messages:
    39,531
    Thanks Received:
    5,899
    Trophy Points:
    1,140
    Location:
    North Carolina
    Ratings:
    +8,941
    I have asked today and on other days before.

    Since the Gitmo detainees that will be tried in open Federal Court had no basic Federally guaranteed rights how does one try them in court?

    NO Miranda rights.

    No right to a Lawyer before being interrogated

    No Lawyer to argue for bail

    No Lawyer at all

    No right to a speedy trial.

    Held with no basic criminal court rights at all.

    THEN Holder, the Attorney General announces that even if the defendents are found not guilty or released because of all the violations they will be rearrested by the Military and held for Military Tribunals.

    In other words NO presumption of Innocence at all, they are presumed guilty and if the Court disagrees it will be ignored.

    How is this Justice? How is this even LEGAL.

    Military Tribunals are legal because of long history and because the Supreme Court has ruled in these cases they can be used. Holder is going to ( with Obama's permission ) VIOLATE FEDERAL LAW and he is the SENIOR Legal advisor in the Country.

    Explain how you can support this knowing all this?
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
  2. RetiredGySgt
    Online

    RetiredGySgt Platinum Member

    Joined:
    May 6, 2007
    Messages:
    39,531
    Thanks Received:
    5,899
    Trophy Points:
    1,140
    Location:
    North Carolina
    Ratings:
    +8,941
    Where is Jillian?

    Where is Rightwinger?

    Where are all the dumb asses supporting this?

    Afraid to be shown for the lying cowards you are?

    Afraid President Obama and Holder are shown for liars and breakers of our very own Judicial System?

    Come on Justify it, explain it.
     
  3. xotoxi
    Offline

    xotoxi Platinum Member

    Joined:
    Mar 1, 2009
    Messages:
    30,322
    Thanks Received:
    5,203
    Trophy Points:
    1,110
    Location:
    your mother
    Ratings:
    +5,492
    Why do you make the assumption that people support this?

    I don't.
     
  4. kwc57
    Offline

    kwc57 BOHICA Obama

    Joined:
    Jul 13, 2009
    Messages:
    12,154
    Thanks Received:
    2,301
    Trophy Points:
    255
    Location:
    Oklahoma City, OK
    Ratings:
    +2,788
    I'm conservative. All I'll say is this.......if Bush hadn't been such a candyass and had handled the situation when HE was President, we wouldn't be in this position now.
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
  5. Ravi
    Offline

    Ravi Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Feb 27, 2008
    Messages:
    81,329
    Thanks Received:
    12,695
    Trophy Points:
    2,205
    Location:
    Hating Hatters
    Ratings:
    +29,776
    Yep. What a fucked up nightmare he pushed off onto the next administration.
     
  6. RetiredGySgt
    Online

    RetiredGySgt Platinum Member

    Joined:
    May 6, 2007
    Messages:
    39,531
    Thanks Received:
    5,899
    Trophy Points:
    1,140
    Location:
    North Carolina
    Ratings:
    +8,941
    Taken care of BEFORE he left office, He was stopped 3 times by LIBERAL CANDY ASSES and it went to court. The Supreme Court finally heard it and ruled BEFORE he was out of offcie that tribunals were allowed.

    You two can take your lying asses some where else.
     
  7. Dante
    Offline

    Dante On leave Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Dec 1, 2008
    Messages:
    52,463
    Thanks Received:
    3,324
    Trophy Points:
    1,825
    Location:
    On leave
    Ratings:
    +6,054
    Easy. You are misrepresenting most every thing.
     
  8. Midnight Marauder
    Offline

    Midnight Marauder BANNED

    Joined:
    Feb 28, 2009
    Messages:
    12,404
    Thanks Received:
    1,876
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Ratings:
    +1,876
    I've had this conversation with Jillian, and she doesn't support this. Especially the part about the detainees being held indefinitely anyway, regardless of the outcome of the trials gives her problems.

    Or so I recall her saying. I may be wrong.
     
  9. CrusaderFrank
    Online

    CrusaderFrank Diamond Member

    Joined:
    May 20, 2009
    Messages:
    81,192
    Thanks Received:
    14,906
    Trophy Points:
    2,210
    Ratings:
    +36,935
    Small little detail: KSM was tried before a military tribunal and plead guilty
     
  10. RetiredGySgt
    Online

    RetiredGySgt Platinum Member

    Joined:
    May 6, 2007
    Messages:
    39,531
    Thanks Received:
    5,899
    Trophy Points:
    1,140
    Location:
    North Carolina
    Ratings:
    +8,941
    Provide evidence, I have HOLDER on National TV announcing just what I said.

    Further explain how any sane Judge can even hold a trial when none of the safeguards provided a defendant existed for these men.
     

Share This Page