Neubarth
At the Ballpark July 30th
Not if we believe the corrupt government numbers.Don't we have higher job loss counts than during the great depression?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Not if we believe the corrupt government numbers.Don't we have higher job loss counts than during the great depression?
In the depression, the unemployment rate reached 25 percent. We haven't had nearly the number of bank failures this time that we did in 1929.
In the depression, the unemployment rate reached 25 percent. We haven't had nearly the number of bank failures this time that we did in 1929.
do we still figure unemployment the same way as during the great depression?
I doubt that we do.
In the depression, the unemployment rate reached 25 percent. We haven't had nearly the number of bank failures this time that we did in 1929.
do we still figure unemployment the same way as during the great depression?
I doubt that we do.
We didn't really count unemployment during the depression. The survey didn't start until 1941. There were attempts by using the census in 1930 and a postcard census in 1936 but there was no coherent definition. The official numbers for the depression were calculated in 1948 and the definition is pretty much what it is today. It would be off by no more than 1 or 2 percentage points.
So that's including even discouraged workers? Sounds to me like this is a tad misleading.The rate of job loss is nowhere near the rate during the Depression.
1929 Versus 2007: Employment Change | The Big Picture
as a total number yes. But as a percentage of populace not quite yet.Don't we have higher job loss counts than during the great depression?
So that's including even discouraged workers? Sounds to me like this is a tad misleading.The rate of job loss is nowhere near the rate during the Depression.
1929 Versus 2007: Employment Change | The Big Picture
The Great Depression was not THAT bad. My father born in 1909 went through medical school during the great depression. His father a vaudevillian who was out of work because of the talking movie craze helped pay the way by working as a tailor for Hart Scheffner and Marx, a Jewish clothing company of some respect. They were hiring good tailors all the way through the Depression.Michael Darda of MKM Partners estimated that if you used the U-6 methodology, i.e. the one that says the unemployment rate is 17% today, 44% of people would have been unemployed at the height of the Great Depression.
Gosh, when the lefties were screaming at election time we were in a recession which was going to become a depression of depression era proportions they were WRONG. Just like they're WRONG about everything.
But never fear, their policies may yet make their dreams come true.
The Great Depression was not THAT bad.
They can't admit not even the smallest positive thing about Obama.
I'll try to tone it down there podner. My only concern is that people who are hardworking will lose more of their life savings when people finally realize that there is no economic recovery and the stock market crashes for a second time.Hey Neubarth! SHHHH! Damn it, if you convivce the idiots they will begin to prepare and the price of silver will rise and I won't own them after the crash!
Please believe that Obama knows how to save us all. He is right, we can spend our way out of debt, government healthcare will not increase the deficit and global warming can be stopped if we give enough money to the non-white (read that STUPID) nations.
Go back to sleep. Don't let Neubarth scare you! He is obviosly a racist, sexest, homophobe hung up on "FACTS". We know what our government school teachers told us, don't we. Sleep,sleep,sleep.