'No Excuses' for Liberals

Discussion in 'Politics' started by CrimsonWhite, Nov 18, 2008.

  1. CrimsonWhite
    Offline

    CrimsonWhite *****istrator Emeritus Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Mar 13, 2006
    Messages:
    7,978
    Thanks Received:
    1,755
    Trophy Points:
    123
    Location:
    Guntucky
    Ratings:
    +1,757
    Outstanding read.

     
  2. Jeepers
    Offline

    Jeepers Senior Member

    Joined:
    Feb 11, 2008
    Messages:
    1,399
    Thanks Received:
    58
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    Charleston SC
    Ratings:
    +59
    I dont read WSJ since it became just another Ruppy rag. I do think that cons need to butt the fuck out when it comes to defining liberals... they cant get there ideology together ... what makes you think they will get libs right....
     
    Last edited: Nov 18, 2008
  3. midcan5
    Offline

    midcan5 liberal / progressive

    Joined:
    Jun 4, 2007
    Messages:
    10,776
    Thanks Received:
    2,363
    Trophy Points:
    245
    Location:
    Philly, PA
    Ratings:
    +3,286
    The opinion pieces of the WSJ are outright hooey, that anyone reads them is amazing. Consider that this is a financial paper that was pretty much clueless of the recent financial turmoil, maybe they should try to stick to what they think they know rather than idle speculation about their philosophical foes.
     
  4. CrimsonWhite
    Offline

    CrimsonWhite *****istrator Emeritus Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Mar 13, 2006
    Messages:
    7,978
    Thanks Received:
    1,755
    Trophy Points:
    123
    Location:
    Guntucky
    Ratings:
    +1,757
    So do you agree that liberals should butt the fuck out when it comes to defining conservatives? Of course you don't.
     
  5. Jon
    Offline

    Jon The CPA

    Joined:
    Mar 20, 2008
    Messages:
    8,101
    Thanks Received:
    1,276
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    Fayetteville, AR
    Ratings:
    +1,281
    Welcome to the liberal world, Crim. They're right. We're wrong. Period. Goodbye.
     
  6. Jeepers
    Offline

    Jeepers Senior Member

    Joined:
    Feb 11, 2008
    Messages:
    1,399
    Thanks Received:
    58
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    Charleston SC
    Ratings:
    +59
    Nope.. way I see it.. when you cats finally figure it out, you'll let us know...
     
  7. Jeepers
    Offline

    Jeepers Senior Member

    Joined:
    Feb 11, 2008
    Messages:
    1,399
    Thanks Received:
    58
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    Charleston SC
    Ratings:
    +59
    See.. are we left or right.. You cats are all over the place.. this highlights my point...
     
  8. Jon
    Offline

    Jon The CPA

    Joined:
    Mar 20, 2008
    Messages:
    8,101
    Thanks Received:
    1,276
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    Fayetteville, AR
    Ratings:
    +1,281
    That was a really stupid post. If it was an attempt at humor, it failed. If it wasn't an attempt at humor, you fail.
     
  9. Red Dawn
    Offline

    Red Dawn Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2008
    Messages:
    3,224
    Thanks Received:
    456
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    Liberal Socialist Paradise
    Ratings:
    +456
    These are confusing times indeed.

    First, Obama was a radical marxist. Then his victory was a because of his center-right politics. There was no liberal mandate, because Obama ran as a reaganite. In 2006, I was told the only reason democrats took over congress, is because "so many" conservative democrats won. Hence, 2006 was a victory for conservatism of sorts.

    Now, we're back to liberals having a stranglehold on power, and a massive mandate?
     
  10. editec
    Offline

    editec Mr. Forgot-it-All

    Joined:
    Jun 5, 2008
    Messages:
    41,427
    Thanks Received:
    5,598
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    Maine
    Ratings:
    +5,617
    The DEMS better shit or get off the pot.

    I quite agree with the WSJ that it's their game to win or lose.

    The WSJ is a great paper, but the editorials= section isn't designed to appeal to liberals.
     

Share This Page