No defense is the best defense when there's no defense.

[edward37]

Orange man bad post lol grow up democrats YA LOST, your gonna lose again move on .. improve your shit holes and bring a decent candidate

How's the art of the deal guys tariff war going ?? Settle the BS phase 1 after the election?? DOW off over 200 again ??
We have a moron in our WH now and everyone in the world except a few dotards know it

Going great China is rioting Iran is rioting

Trump opens yapper DOW falls over 300 We have an idiot in our WH

He’s a powerful man

When you give an idiot that much power nothing good can come of it Bet he told friends to sell the markets before he spoke about holding off China talks

 

[Jitss617]

Orange man bad post lol grow up democrats YA LOST, your gonna lose again move on .. improve your shit holes and bring a decent candidate

How's the art of the deal guys tariff war going ?? Settle the BS phase 1 after the election?? DOW off over 200 again ??
We have a moron in our WH now and everyone in the world except a few dotards know it

Going great China is rioting Iran is rioting

Trump opens yapper DOW falls over 300 We have an idiot in our WH

He’s a powerful man

When you give an idiot that much power nothing good can come of it Bet he told friends to sell the markets before he spoke about holding off China talks

Huh? Read what history is recording,, the greatest administration EVER
JOBS, wars, foreign relations, immigration.. it’s like wow! And all the interference from Nazi democrats absolutely amazing ! Have you seen his rallies? Wow

 

[berg80]

How's the art of the deal guys tariff war going ?? Settle the BS phase 1 after the election?? DOW off over 200 again ??
We have a moron in our WH now and everyone in the world except a few dotards know it

Going great China is rioting Iran is rioting

Trump opens yapper DOW falls over 300 We have an idiot in our WH

He’s a powerful man

When you give an idiot that much power nothing good can come of it Bet he told friends to sell the markets before he spoke about holding off China talks

Huh? Read what history is recording,, the greatest administration EVER
JOBS, wars, foreign relations, immigration.. it’s like wow! And all the interference from Nazi democrats absolutely amazing ! Have you seen his rallies? Wow

So................because the economy has responded to the Keynesian stimulative policy of deficit spending we are supposed to give Trump a pass for abuse of authority, illegal solicitation of election meddling, and obstructing a congressional investigation?

 

[Jitss617]

Going great China is rioting Iran is rioting

Trump opens yapper DOW falls over 300 We have an idiot in our WH

He’s a powerful man

When you give an idiot that much power nothing good can come of it Bet he told friends to sell the markets before he spoke about holding off China talks

Huh? Read what history is recording,, the greatest administration EVER
JOBS, wars, foreign relations, immigration.. it’s like wow! And all the interference from Nazi democrats absolutely amazing ! Have you seen his rallies? Wow

So................because the economy has responded to the Keynesian stimulative policy of deficit spending we are supposed to give Trump a pass for abuse of authority, illegal solicitation of election meddling, and obstructing a congressional investigation?

What trump has done is not uncommon ..you’re suffering from TDS . Your gonna lose again

 

[edward37]

Trump opens yapper DOW falls over 300 We have an idiot in our WH

He’s a powerful man

When you give an idiot that much power nothing good can come of it Bet he told friends to sell the markets before he spoke about holding off China talks

Huh? Read what history is recording,, the greatest administration EVER
JOBS, wars, foreign relations, immigration.. it’s like wow! And all the interference from Nazi democrats absolutely amazing ! Have you seen his rallies? Wow

So................because the economy has responded to the Keynesian stimulative policy of deficit spending we are supposed to give Trump a pass for abuse of authority, illegal solicitation of election meddling, and obstructing a congressional investigation?

What trump has done is not uncommon ..you’re suffering from TDS . Your gonna lose again

Jitss remember trump 3 years ago saying Trade wars are easy to win???? He is so FOS

 

[whitehall]

Alleged Russian interference in the election happened under Hussein's watch. Instead of focusing on Russia, the Hussein administration chose to use fake information from a foreign source who may have been an agent of the Russians to conduct an illegal surveillance on a political opponent.

 

[berg80]

Trump opens yapper DOW falls over 300 We have an idiot in our WH

He’s a powerful man

When you give an idiot that much power nothing good can come of it Bet he told friends to sell the markets before he spoke about holding off China talks

Huh? Read what history is recording,, the greatest administration EVER
JOBS, wars, foreign relations, immigration.. it’s like wow! And all the interference from Nazi democrats absolutely amazing ! Have you seen his rallies? Wow

So................because the economy has responded to the Keynesian stimulative policy of deficit spending we are supposed to give Trump a pass for abuse of authority, illegal solicitation of election meddling, and obstructing a congressional investigation?

What trump has done is not uncommon ..you’re suffering from TDS . Your gonna lose again

It's uncommon (the Pentagon thought it was illegal) for a prez to withhold military aid to an ally without notifying Congress, effecting our national security as well as their's, in order to procure a personal, political favor. Why are you still confused about this?

 

[Anathema]

One only needs to list a defense when there is something to defend oneself against. The Democrat prosecutors have provided no first hand evidence, no documents or other direct evidence showing any form of quid pro quo arrangement by the POTUS.

There’s nothing to defend him against. Therefore, mounting a defense would only make it look like there was something to be denied or defended against. You can’t disprove something that hasn’t been proven in the first place.

 

[edward37]

How's the art of the deal guys tariff war going ?? Settle the BS phase 1 after the election?? DOW off over 200 again ??
We have a moron in our WH now and everyone in the world except a few dotards know it

Going great China is rioting Iran is rioting

Trump opens yapper DOW falls over 300 We have an idiot in our WH

He’s a powerful man

When you give an idiot that much power nothing good can come of it Bet he told friends to sell the markets before he spoke about holding off China talks

Huh? Read what history is recording,, the greatest administration EVER
JOBS, wars, foreign relations, immigration.. it’s like wow! And all the interference from Nazi democrats absolutely amazing ! Have you seen his rallies? Wow

Are you fn kidding me ?? The people hurt the most by trumps trade war BS are HIS PEOPLE the idiots who voted for him and that's a fact Jack ,,,,, and now a meager phase 1 deal can't even be made?

 

[berg80]

One only needs to list a defense when there is something to defend oneself against. The Democrat prosecutors have provided no first hand evidence, no documents or other direct evidence showing any form of quid pro quo arrangement by the POTUS.

There’s nothing to defend him against. Therefore, mounting a defense would only make it look like there was something to be denied or defended against. You can’t disprove something that hasn’t been proven in the first place.

We're past that now. This is a slam dunk case. They have first person testimony, they have the transcript, they have the texts, they'd have more documentary evidence if Trump was obstructing the investigation by not allowing it to be turned over. It was extortion plain and simple. Even Sondland said it was and that many people were in on it............all at the direction of the Divider-in-Chief.

 

[edward37]

One only needs to list a defense when there is something to defend oneself against. The Democrat prosecutors have provided no first hand evidence, no documents or other direct evidence showing any form of quid pro quo arrangement by the POTUS.

There’s nothing to defend him against. Therefore, mounting a defense would only make it look like there was something to be denied or defended against. You can’t disprove something that hasn’t been proven in the first place.

You mean they can't disprove what all those experts in the region are saying ? I especially like the lady Lee I think her name is, telling the republicans they're mouthing just what Putin wants

 

[easyt65]

If Mike Pompeo had exculpatory evidence to offer in Vlad's chosen candidate's defense he would have been told to run, not walk, to Capital Hill to testify to it.
If Mick Mulvaney had exculpatory evidence to offer in Vlad's chosen candidate's defense he would have been told to run, not walk, to Capital Hill to testify to it.
If Rick Perry had exculpatory evidence to offer in Vlad's chosen candidate's defense he would have been told to run, not walk, to Capital Hill to testify to it.
If John Bolton had exculpatory evidence to offer in Vlad's chosen candidate's defense he would have been told to run, not walk, to Capital Hill to testify to it.

If anyone in the admin had exculpatory evidence to offer in Vlad's chosen candidate's defense they would have been told to run, not walk, to Capital Hill to testify to it.

If the WH felt having an attorney present at the Judiciary Committee hearing could provide a viable defense for the bloviating former reality TV star they would send one.

But when there is no defense the best defense is to complain that the hearings are being held in secret.........until they aren't. Or that Repubs aren't being allowed to participate.......which they were. Or that the prez isn't being allowed to defend himself.........which he is. In other words.........................
"If the facts are against you argue the law, if the law is against you argue the facts, if the law and the facts are against you, yell like hell."

Baby Donald is shaking his rattle as loudly as he can. He's calling the inquiry a sham, he is illegally blocking witness testimony, he's throwing shyte on the wall, mud in the water, doing everything he (and his right wing media enablers) can to confuse, obfuscate, and obstruct. It's not how innocent people act.

That is an extremely long-winded way of admitting for the last 4 years the Democrats, having failed to present any evidence of a crime committed by the President during multiple failed coup attempts, that they have been operating under the projected declaration - as with Kavanaugh - that the President, Republicans, Conservatives, and anyone who does not embrace their liberal progressive extremist socialist democrat ideology and agenda are 'Guilty Until Proven Innocent', that false accusations hurled by the left demand the accused be forced to prove their innocence.

Thank you for the 'vision' of what American would / will look like if the criminal, seditious, treasonous, take-back-power-at-any-cost Democrats ever take back control and 'rule' in this country, finishing the 'fundamental change' Barry started.

 

[edward37]

If Mike Pompeo had exculpatory evidence to offer in Vlad's chosen candidate's defense he would have been told to run, not walk, to Capital Hill to testify to it.
If Mick Mulvaney had exculpatory evidence to offer in Vlad's chosen candidate's defense he would have been told to run, not walk, to Capital Hill to testify to it.
If Rick Perry had exculpatory evidence to offer in Vlad's chosen candidate's defense he would have been told to run, not walk, to Capital Hill to testify to it.
If John Bolton had exculpatory evidence to offer in Vlad's chosen candidate's defense he would have been told to run, not walk, to Capital Hill to testify to it.

If anyone in the admin had exculpatory evidence to offer in Vlad's chosen candidate's defense they would have been told to run, not walk, to Capital Hill to testify to it.

If the WH felt having an attorney present at the Judiciary Committee hearing could provide a viable defense for the bloviating former reality TV star they would send one.

But when there is no defense the best defense is to complain that the hearings are being held in secret.........until they aren't. Or that Repubs aren't being allowed to participate.......which they were. Or that the prez isn't being allowed to defend himself.........which he is. In other words.........................
"If the facts are against you argue the law, if the law is against you argue the facts, if the law and the facts are against you, yell like hell."

Baby Donald is shaking his rattle as loudly as he can. He's calling the inquiry a sham, he is illegally blocking witness testimony, he's throwing shyte on the wall, mud in the water, doing everything he (and his right wing media enablers) can to confuse, obfuscate, and obstruct. It's not how innocent people act.

That is an extremely long-winded way of admitting for the last 4 years the Democrats, having failed to present any evidence of a crime committed by the President during multiple failed coup attempts, that they have been operating under the projected declaration - as with Kavanaugh - that the President, Republicans, Conservatives, and anyone who does not embrace their liberal progressive extremist socialist democrat ideology and agenda are 'Guilty Until Proven Innocent', that false accusations hurled by the left demand the accused be forced to prove their innocence.

Thank you for the 'vision' of what American would / will look like if the criminal, seditious, treasonous, take-back-power-at-any-cost Democrats ever take back control and 'rule' in this country, finishing the 'fundamental change' Barry started.

Hey easy Trade war hurting you like most of trump voters?? But trade wars are easy? LOL

 

[Jitss617]

He’s a powerful man

When you give an idiot that much power nothing good can come of it Bet he told friends to sell the markets before he spoke about holding off China talks

Huh? Read what history is recording,, the greatest administration EVER
JOBS, wars, foreign relations, immigration.. it’s like wow! And all the interference from Nazi democrats absolutely amazing ! Have you seen his rallies? Wow

So................because the economy has responded to the Keynesian stimulative policy of deficit spending we are supposed to give Trump a pass for abuse of authority, illegal solicitation of election meddling, and obstructing a congressional investigation?

What trump has done is not uncommon ..you’re suffering from TDS . Your gonna lose again

Jitss remember trump 3 years ago saying Trade wars are easy to win???? He is so FOS

He is winning

 

[edward37]

When you give an idiot that much power nothing good can come of it Bet he told friends to sell the markets before he spoke about holding off China talks

Huh? Read what history is recording,, the greatest administration EVER
JOBS, wars, foreign relations, immigration.. it’s like wow! And all the interference from Nazi democrats absolutely amazing ! Have you seen his rallies? Wow

So................because the economy has responded to the Keynesian stimulative policy of deficit spending we are supposed to give Trump a pass for abuse of authority, illegal solicitation of election meddling, and obstructing a congressional investigation?

What trump has done is not uncommon ..you’re suffering from TDS . Your gonna lose again

Jitss remember trump 3 years ago saying Trade wars are easy to win???? He is so FOS

He is winning

Jit You one of Rumps guys that are hurting because of his trade wars?

 

[berg80]

When you give an idiot that much power nothing good can come of it Bet he told friends to sell the markets before he spoke about holding off China talks

Huh? Read what history is recording,, the greatest administration EVER
JOBS, wars, foreign relations, immigration.. it’s like wow! And all the interference from Nazi democrats absolutely amazing ! Have you seen his rallies? Wow

So................because the economy has responded to the Keynesian stimulative policy of deficit spending we are supposed to give Trump a pass for abuse of authority, illegal solicitation of election meddling, and obstructing a congressional investigation?

What trump has done is not uncommon ..you’re suffering from TDS . Your gonna lose again

Jitss remember trump 3 years ago saying Trade wars are easy to win???? He is so FOS

He is winning

If by winning you mean ripping the country apart...........indeed he is.

Romney says ‘no evidence’ that Ukraine interfered in U.S. elections

Sen. Mitt Romney (R-Utah) challenged the assertion from the White House and some of his GOP colleagues that Ukraine had interfered in the 2016 election.

“I saw no evidence from our intelligence community, nor from the representatives today from the Department of State, that there is any evidence of any kind that suggests that Ukraine interfered in our elections,” Romney told reporters outside a Senate hearing. “We have ample evidence that Russia interfered in our elections.”

The all too predictable reaction of Trump cult members will be to dismiss Romney as a "never Trumper" because they can not factually dispute what he said.

 

[Coyote]

If Mike Pompeo had exculpatory evidence to offer in Vlad's chosen candidate's defense he would have been told to run, not walk, to Capital Hill to testify to it.
If Mick Mulvaney had exculpatory evidence to offer in Vlad's chosen candidate's defense he would have been told to run, not walk, to Capital Hill to testify to it.
If Rick Perry had exculpatory evidence to offer in Vlad's chosen candidate's defense he would have been told to run, not walk, to Capital Hill to testify to it.
If John Bolton had exculpatory evidence to offer in Vlad's chosen candidate's defense he would have been told to run, not walk, to Capital Hill to testify to it.

If anyone in the admin had exculpatory evidence to offer in Vlad's chosen candidate's defense they would have been told to run, not walk, to Capital Hill to testify to it.

If the WH felt having an attorney present at the Judiciary Committee hearing could provide a viable defense for the bloviating former reality TV star they would send one.

But when there is no defense the best defense is to complain that the hearings are being held in secret.........until they aren't. Or that Repubs aren't being allowed to participate.......which they were. Or that the prez isn't being allowed to defend himself.........which he is. In other words.........................
"If the facts are against you argue the law, if the law is against you argue the facts, if the law and the facts are against you, yell like hell."

Baby Donald is shaking his rattle as loudly as he can. He's calling the inquiry a sham, he is illegally blocking witness testimony, he's throwing shyte on the wall, mud in the water, doing everything he (and his right wing media enablers) can to confuse, obfuscate, and obstruct. It's not how innocent people act.

View attachment 292932

How fitting that on a thread about Don's lack of a defense, a Trumpette can't offer a defense.

Ever heard of English common law?....It's the exact opposite of the Stalinist drivel that drips off of your moronic OP.

Now go light a candle at the shrine to your dear uncle Josef.

How exactly is it Stalinist or is that simply a reflexive burst of noise on your part?

 

[kwc57]

If Mike Pompeo had exculpatory evidence to offer in Vlad's chosen candidate's defense he would have been told to run, not walk, to Capital Hill to testify to it.
If Mick Mulvaney had exculpatory evidence to offer in Vlad's chosen candidate's defense he would have been told to run, not walk, to Capital Hill to testify to it.
If Rick Perry had exculpatory evidence to offer in Vlad's chosen candidate's defense he would have been told to run, not walk, to Capital Hill to testify to it.
If John Bolton had exculpatory evidence to offer in Vlad's chosen candidate's defense he would have been told to run, not walk, to Capital Hill to testify to it.

If anyone in the admin had exculpatory evidence to offer in Vlad's chosen candidate's defense they would have been told to run, not walk, to Capital Hill to testify to it.

If the WH felt having an attorney present at the Judiciary Committee hearing could provide a viable defense for the bloviating former reality TV star they would send one.

But when there is no defense the best defense is to complain that the hearings are being held in secret.........until they aren't. Or that Repubs aren't being allowed to participate.......which they were. Or that the prez isn't being allowed to defend himself.........which he is. In other words.........................
"If the facts are against you argue the law, if the law is against you argue the facts, if the law and the facts are against you, yell like hell."

Baby Donald is shaking his rattle as loudly as he can. He's calling the inquiry a sham, he is illegally blocking witness testimony, he's throwing shyte on the wall, mud in the water, doing everything he (and his right wing media enablers) can to confuse, obfuscate, and obstruct. It's not how innocent people act.

View attachment 292932

Yes, you stalinists always love it when democracies try to turn into dictatorships.

Projecting yourself onto others actually requires at least a smidgen of proof. You have none.

Out of their own mouths isn't proof enough ?? ""Russia if you hear me""

Do you have the same level of difficulty understanding the humor of Colbert?

 

[kwc57]

If Mike Pompeo had exculpatory evidence to offer in Vlad's chosen candidate's defense he would have been told to run, not walk, to Capital Hill to testify to it.
If Mick Mulvaney had exculpatory evidence to offer in Vlad's chosen candidate's defense he would have been told to run, not walk, to Capital Hill to testify to it.
If Rick Perry had exculpatory evidence to offer in Vlad's chosen candidate's defense he would have been told to run, not walk, to Capital Hill to testify to it.
If John Bolton had exculpatory evidence to offer in Vlad's chosen candidate's defense he would have been told to run, not walk, to Capital Hill to testify to it.

If anyone in the admin had exculpatory evidence to offer in Vlad's chosen candidate's defense they would have been told to run, not walk, to Capital Hill to testify to it.

If the WH felt having an attorney present at the Judiciary Committee hearing could provide a viable defense for the bloviating former reality TV star they would send one.

But when there is no defense the best defense is to complain that the hearings are being held in secret.........until they aren't. Or that Repubs aren't being allowed to participate.......which they were. Or that the prez isn't being allowed to defend himself.........which he is. In other words.........................
"If the facts are against you argue the law, if the law is against you argue the facts, if the law and the facts are against you, yell like hell."

Baby Donald is shaking his rattle as loudly as he can. He's calling the inquiry a sham, he is illegally blocking witness testimony, he's throwing shyte on the wall, mud in the water, doing everything he (and his right wing media enablers) can to confuse, obfuscate, and obstruct. It's not how innocent people act.

You have a little bullshit in the corner of your mouth.

 

[edward37]

Am I a sadist?? I can't stop laughing finding out it's Trump voters mostly, getting hurt with his trade war