Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
WASHINGTON -- As if voters don't have enough to be angry about this election year, the government is expected to announce this week that more than 58 million Social Security recipients will go through another year without an increase in their monthly benefits.
Two years in a row.
Psst. The stock market beat that over the past year.
Government Expected to Nix Cost-of-Living Increase for Social Security Again - FoxNews.com
WASHINGTON -- As if voters don't have enough to be angry about this election year, the government is expected to announce this week that more than 58 million Social Security recipients will go through another year without an increase in their monthly benefits.
Thank you St Ronnie for taxing SS!!!Two years in a row.
Psst. The stock market beat that over the past year.
Government Expected to Nix Cost-of-Living Increase for Social Security Again - FoxNews.com
WASHINGTON -- As if voters don't have enough to be angry about this election year, the government is expected to announce this week that more than 58 million Social Security recipients will go through another year without an increase in their monthly benefits.
What are the Statists going to do? Everytime they Increase SS payouts...they increase the taxation upon those payouts....
Thank you St Ronnie for taxing SS!!!Two years in a row.
Psst. The stock market beat that over the past year.
Government Expected to Nix Cost-of-Living Increase for Social Security Again - FoxNews.com
What are the Statists going to do? Everytime they Increase SS payouts...they increase the taxation upon those payouts....
CON$ will tax anything they can think of taxing.
Thank you St Ronnie for taxing SS!!!Two years in a row.
Psst. The stock market beat that over the past year.
Government Expected to Nix Cost-of-Living Increase for Social Security Again - FoxNews.com
What are the Statists going to do? Everytime they Increase SS payouts...they increase the taxation upon those payouts....
CON$ will tax anything they can think of taxing.
And well they should be taxed, unlike taxing SS, tanning beds increase skin cancer taxing the health care system.Thank you St Ronnie for taxing SS!!!What are the Statists going to do? Everytime they Increase SS payouts...they increase the taxation upon those payouts....
CON$ will tax anything they can think of taxing.
Yeah. Right.
Health care bill imposes 10% tax on tanning salon customers - Mar. 24, 2010
And well they should be taxed, unlike taxing SS, tanning beds increase skin cancer taxing the health care system.Thank you St Ronnie for taxing SS!!!
CON$ will tax anything they can think of taxing.
Yeah. Right.
Health care bill imposes 10% tax on tanning salon customers - Mar. 24, 2010
The Dangers of Tanning Beds: Five Fast Facts - Skin Care
3. It's a Proven Danger
Many studies show that exposure to ultraviolet (UV) light is a definite risk factor for melanoma [8]. Using a tanning bed more than 10 times a year made people seven times more likely to develop malignant melanoma than those who did not use tanning beds as often [6]. The risk of melanoma was increased by 300% for those using tanning beds occasionally and by 800% for those using tanning beds more than 10 times a year.
Nice try shit for brains!Thank you St Ronnie for taxing SS!!!What are the Statists going to do? Everytime they Increase SS payouts...they increase the taxation upon those payouts....
CON$ will tax anything they can think of taxing.
Uh UH...and proposed BY WHOM Exactly?
The 1983 Amendments
Nice try shitstain.
Whom was in charge of the Congress?
All you ros clots have shown is what pathological liars you are. Greenspan, who proposed taxing SS, is a lifelong Republican.There ya go, cumstain.
You've been totally pwn'd here. First, we've shown that it's the Dems that love taxing shit. Then we showed that it was Dems who proposed taxing SS.
And now you're giving reasons why it's really OK to tax something innocuous like a tanning bed. Hey, tofu is bad for the brain
About.com: http://starbulletin.com/1999/11/19/news/story4.html
Let's tax that too!
Shitbird.
All you ros clots have shown is what pathological liars you are. Greenspan, who proposed taxing SS, is a lifelong Republican.There ya go, cumstain.
You've been totally pwn'd here. First, we've shown that it's the Dems that love taxing shit. Then we showed that it was Dems who proposed taxing SS.
And now you're giving reasons why it's really OK to tax something innocuous like a tanning bed. Hey, tofu is bad for the brain
About.com: http://starbulletin.com/1999/11/19/news/story4.html
Let's tax that too!
Shitbird.
It was partisan hack RABBID who gives a tinker's DAYUM what his afilliation is, that is if YOU can read.All you ros clots have shown is what pathological liars you are. Greenspan, who proposed taxing SS, is a lifelong Republican.There ya go, cumstain.
You've been totally pwn'd here. First, we've shown that it's the Dems that love taxing shit. Then we showed that it was Dems who proposed taxing SS.
And now you're giving reasons why it's really OK to tax something innocuous like a tanning bed. Hey, tofu is bad for the brain
About.com: http://starbulletin.com/1999/11/19/news/story4.html
Let's tax that too!
Shitbird.
Who gives a tinker's DAYUM what his afilliation is? He is still wrong...but not readily apparent to a PARTISAN hack as yourself.
It was partisan hack RABBID who gives a tinker's DAYUM what his afilliation is, that is if YOU can read.All you ros clots have shown is what pathological liars you are. Greenspan, who proposed taxing SS, is a lifelong Republican.
Who gives a tinker's DAYUM what his afilliation is? He is still wrong...but not readily apparent to a PARTISAN hack as yourself.
Theoretically the deferred COLA shouldn't matter because there has been no increase in the inflation index which the COLA is based on.
Two years in a row.
Psst. The stock market beat that over the past year.
Government Expected to Nix Cost-of-Living Increase for Social Security Again - FoxNews.com
WASHINGTON -- As if voters don't have enough to be angry about this election year, the government is expected to announce this week that more than 58 million Social Security recipients will go through another year without an increase in their monthly benefits.
Two years in a row.
Psst. The stock market beat that over the past year.
Government Expected to Nix Cost-of-Living Increase for Social Security Again - FoxNews.com
WASHINGTON -- As if voters don't have enough to be angry about this election year, the government is expected to announce this week that more than 58 million Social Security recipients will go through another year without an increase in their monthly benefits.
It isn't just the 58 million Social Security recipients that won't see a raise, it's also the millions of service connected disabled veterans also. All totaled, one hell of a major voting block.
