Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Newt Gingrich - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Ethics sanctions
Eighty-four ethics charges were filed against Speaker Gingrich during his term, including claiming tax-exempt status for a college course run for political purposes. Following an investigation by the House Ethics Committee Gingrich was sanctioned US$300,000.[69] Gingrich acknowledged in January 1997 that "In my name and over my signature, inaccurate, incomplete and unreliable statements were given to the committee". [70] The House Ethics Committee concluded that inaccurate information supplied to investigators represented "intentional or ... reckless" disregard of House rules.[71] Special Counsel James M. Cole concluded that Gingrich violated federal tax law and had lied to the ethics panel in an effort to force the committee to dismiss the complaint against him. The full committee panel did not agree whether tax law had been violated[72] and left that issue up to the IRS.[73] In 1999, the IRS cleared the organizations connected with the "Renewing American Civilization" courses under investigation for possible tax violations.[74
Don't think the democrats won't use this, think again, they can't wait.
And there is this:
Newt Gingrich Freddie Mac | Newt Gingrich's Freddie Mac work draws new scrutiny - Los Angeles Times
And more, but of course he has flipped and flopped on this one as well:
Newt Gingrich Slams 'Radical' Paul Ryan Budget, Gets 'Thank You' From Democrats
[
As I noted before
?
I mean, I know you are in full panick mode, now.
Romney is faltering, and you are just scrambling to attack. And soundinglike a democrat.
And more, but of course he has flipped and flopped on this one as well:
Newt Gingrich Slams 'Radical' Paul Ryan Budget, Gets 'Thank You' From Democrats
As I noted before
- Freddie Mac lobbyist
- Supporter of ethanol
- Called Paul Ryan's budget "right-wing social engineering."
- Supports amnesty for illegal immigration
- Supported individual healthcare mandates AKA "Obamacare"
- Pimped global warming with Nancy Pelosi
Heck, forget RINOs and moderates, liberals, how can you not love this guy?
[
As I noted before
?
ohmygodohmygodohmygod, my Mormon Robot is failing miserably....
Man, just listen to the panic of Romney Supporters... They are all crapping their magic underpants.
I mean, I know you are in full panick mode, now.
Romney is faltering, and you are just scrambling to attack. And soundinglike a democrat.
We know you Mormon-haters really, really, really want this, but truth is, Romney has been first or second in the polls since this began. The only difference is who Romney has spared with at the top. Bachmann, Trump, Perry, Cain and now Gingrich. Who, oh who, will it be next month?
[
As I noted before
?
ohmygodohmygodohmygod, my Mormon Robot is failing miserably....
Man, just listen to the panic of Romney Supporters... They are all crapping their magic underpants.
Romney doesn't appeal to you guys in the OWS wing of the Republican party, I guess.
I mean, I know you are in full panick mode, now.
Romney is faltering, and you are just scrambling to attack. And soundinglike a democrat.
We know you Mormon-haters really, really, really want this, but truth is, Romney has been first or second in the polls since this began. The only difference is who Romney has spared with at the top. Bachmann, Trump, Perry, Cain and now Gingrich. Who, oh who, will it be next month?
Actually, that just tells me that Republican voters don't want Romney, no matter how much the Beltway and Wall Street Push him.
He's never broken 25% on the RCP average. He never got higher than that in 2008, either.
Meanwhile, the combined "Not Romneys" have always ranged from 50-60% in any combination.
Eventually, they were going to settle on one. And when they did, Romney was over.
Next month, it will be over. Newt will beat Romney in Iowa, he'll place close in NH, and he'll win SC and FL. And at that point, it's over for Mittens...
If New Hampshire nominates Newt, that means they want Obama to win.
We know you Mormon-haters really, really, really want this, but truth is, Romney has been first or second in the polls since this began. The only difference is who Romney has spared with at the top. Bachmann, Trump, Perry, Cain and now Gingrich. Who, oh who, will it be next month?
Actually, that just tells me that Republican voters don't want Romney, no matter how much the Beltway and Wall Street Push him.
He's never broken 25% on the RCP average. He never got higher than that in 2008, either.
Meanwhile, the combined "Not Romneys" have always ranged from 50-60% in any combination.
Eventually, they were going to settle on one. And when they did, Romney was over.
Next month, it will be over. Newt will beat Romney in Iowa, he'll place close in NH, and he'll win SC and FL. And at that point, it's over for Mittens...
You said the same thing about Perry.
I mean, I know you are in full panick mode, now.
Romney is faltering, and you are just scrambling to attack. And soundinglike a democrat.
We know you Mormon-haters really, really, really want this, but truth is, Romney has been first or second in the polls since this began. The only difference is who Romney has spared with at the top. Bachmann, Trump, Perry, Cain and now Gingrich. Who, oh who, will it be next month?
Actually, that just tells me that Republican voters don't want Romney, no matter how much the Beltway and Wall Street Push him.
He's never broken 25% on the RCP average. He never got higher than that in 2008, either.
Meanwhile, the combined "Not Romneys" have always ranged from 50-60% in any combination.
Eventually, they were going to settle on one. And when they did, Romney was over.
Next month, it will be over. Newt will beat Romney in Iowa, he'll place close in NH, and he'll win SC and FL. And at that point, it's over for Mittens...
