Next Stage In Scandal: White House Claims They Didn’t Edit Benghazi Talking Points

Just how many of you ODS wingnuts actually believe this is a) playing beyond your own fevered fantasies of seeing the Obama admin. brought down and b) actually gonna lead to impeachment?
 
Oh what utter partisan bullcrud.... do you right wingers ever stop lying? ever?

Is this your pass to Heaven, lying ALL the time? You are calling the whitehouse liars yet it is YOU and ALL the right wing propaganda machine LYING once again....

Are you ever going to stop being fooled by your beloved right wing trash media? Ever?

How many times will it take being fooled by them or lead by them in to the wrong direction?

The white house DID NOT change the intelligence reports, THAT'S A FACT JACK. And Petrayus said he did not change them but that the intelligence agencies DID...he did not know which intelligence agency changed them, but that they were NOT changed for ANY POLITICAL REASON.

Yet you still blather on with your silly, lying talking points.

The paper trail SHOWS THE WHITE HOUSE did not make the changes to the unclassified report that susan Rice had to use. PERIOD.

So once again, you are lying.

But that is what you've been taught, isn't it? Lying while you accuse others of lying..... Rush and Fox et al....taught you well....

You really think Obama would have told your ilk to "Bring it on" if he had changed them....? Really?

You've been played a fool....

If he didn't know WHO changed them, then how can he say it wasn't for political reasons? If it wasn't for Political reason...what WAS the reason for it? I'd still like an answer to that!
 
There is no scandel. Just the rounding up the Benghazi-gate haze and putting it in the pen along with the Birthers and all other pseudo-gates the rabid righties have thrown at President Obama.

"An Albatross!"

There is simply a difference between classified and unclassified information. Ms. Rice was given the unclassified version to keep from tipping off the enemy as to what we know.
 
There is no scandel. Just the rounding up the Benghazi-gate haze and putting it in the pen along with the Birthers and all other pseudo-gates the rabid righties have thrown at President Obama.

"An Albatross!"

There is simply a difference between classified and unclassified information. Ms. Rice was given the unclassified version to keep from tipping off the enemy as to what we know.

You mean the enemy that was "there"? So we're now lying to the American people about how badly we fucked up security before the attack took place and how badly we responded when the attack took place...and we're doing that so the enemy won't know what we know?

The absurdity of that argument is breathtaking.
 
Oh what utter partisan bullcrud.... do you right wingers ever stop lying? ever?

Is this your pass to Heaven, lying ALL the time? You are calling the whitehouse liars yet it is YOU and ALL the right wing propaganda machine LYING once again....

Are you ever going to stop being fooled by your beloved right wing trash media? Ever?

How many times will it take being fooled by them or lead by them in to the wrong direction?

The white house DID NOT change the intelligence reports, THAT'S A FACT JACK. And Petrayus said he did not change them but that the intelligence agencies DID...he did not know which intelligence agency changed them, but that they were NOT changed for ANY POLITICAL REASON.

Yet you still blather on with your silly, lying talking points.

The paper trail SHOWS THE WHITE HOUSE did not make the changes to the unclassified report that susan Rice had to use. PERIOD.

So once again, you are lying.

But that is what you've been taught, isn't it? Lying while you accuse others of lying..... Rush and Fox et al....taught you well....

You really think Obama would have told your ilk to "Bring it on" if he had changed them....? Really?

You've been played a fool....

So your contention is that the head of the CIA does not have daily briefings with the POTUS or at least his administration?

Your contention is that the WH was oblivious to it being a planned attack when the rest of the country already knew? It was so freakin obvious I don't think anyone had any doubt.

So the real question is, why did they push a false story so long and so hard? That they did can not be denied intelligently.

The statement you made is quite obvious. Oblamer refuses to have PDB's on a daily basis. His appointees, Jake Clapper, and Brennan are the most likely candidates for having changed the intelligence to suit the W.H. narrative. Why? It was an October surprise that blew up in the face of Obama's election. Sure Obama won his political goal of president for four more years. But at what price?
 
There is no scandel. Just the rounding up the Benghazi-gate haze and putting it in the pen along with the Birthers and all other pseudo-gates the rabid righties have thrown at President Obama.

"An Albatross!"

There is simply a difference between classified and unclassified information. Ms. Rice was given the unclassified version to keep from tipping off the enemy as to what we know.

You mean the enemy that was "there"? So we're now lying to the American people about how badly we fucked up security before the attack took place and how badly we responded when the attack took place...and we're doing that so the enemy won't know what we know?

The absurdity of that argument is breathtaking.

No, I'm saying the American people were not getting the Classified information about what happened nor is there any reasonable expectations that under simular circumstances that kind of classifed infomation would be let out at such an early date either.
 

Forum List

Back
Top